IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v14y1987i1p67-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Perception, Preference, and Schema Discrepancy

Author

Listed:
  • A T Purcell

    (Department of Architecture, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

An experiment is reported in which the relationship between judgments of goodness of example, interest, attractiveness, and preference is examined for a set of landscapes. Goodness-of-example judgments measure the discrepancy between an instance and a prototypical representation stored in a schema in memory. Both the type and the strength of affective responses to the environment are related to amount of discrepancy. The greater the discrepancy the stronger the affective response. The type of affective response changes with increases in discrepancy: for example, from attractive and pleasant, to stimulating and interesting, to exciting and complex, to threatening and ugly. Differences between groups in a culture are related to affective responses to discrepancy and not to differences between the schemata involved. Analyses of the sets of judgments on each of the scales for two groups with different backgrounds by means of the INDSCAL multidimensional scaling model confirms the predicted relationships between the scales and the groups. In addition, the unique orientation of the INDSCAL axes and the weights on the dimensions for each of the scales allowed inferences to be made about the meaning of each of the dimensions in relation to the landscapes, and the relations between the attributes of the dimensions and the goodness-of-example and affective scales.

Suggested Citation

  • A T Purcell, 1987. "Landscape Perception, Preference, and Schema Discrepancy," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 14(1), pages 67-92, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:14:y:1987:i:1:p:67-92
    DOI: 10.1068/b140067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b140067
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b140067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Husson, François & Josse, Julie & Saporta, Gilbert, 2016. "Jan de Leeuw and the French School of Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i06).
    2. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    3. Rolf Langeheine, 1982. "Statistical evaluation of measures of fit in the Lingoes-Borg procrustean individual differences scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 427-442, December.
    4. Wayne DeSarbo & J. Douglas Carroll, 1985. "Three-way metric unfolding via alternating weighted least squares," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 275-300, September.
    5. M B Greeny, 1981. "Regional Preferences for Interlocking Directorates among the Largest American Corporations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(7), pages 829-839, July.
    6. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    7. Pietro Lovaglio & Mario Mezzanzanica, 2013. "Classification of longitudinal career paths," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 989-1008, February.
    8. Michael C Hout & Stephen D Goldinger & Kyle J Brady, 2014. "MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    9. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
    10. Richard Sands & Forrest Young, 1980. "Component models for three-way data: An alternating least squares algorithm with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 39-67, March.
    11. Michele Griessmair & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2009. "Exploring the Cognitive-Emotional Fugue in Electronic Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 213-234, May.
    12. J. Ramsey, 1986. "A PROC MATRIX program for preference-dissimilarity multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 163-170, March.
    13. A. Coxon & Charles Jones, 1980. "Multidimensional scaling: exploration to confirmation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 31-73, January.
    14. Liu, Xiaoming & Lin, Aijing & Li, Shuqi, 2021. "Classification of international stock markets through MDS based on Hurst-surface distance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).
    15. He, Jiayi & Shang, Pengjian & Xiong, Hui, 2018. "Multidimensional scaling analysis of financial time series based on modified cross-sample entropy methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 210-221.
    16. J. Carroll & Geert Soete & Sandra Pruzansky, 1989. "An evaluation of five algorithms for generating an initial configuration for SINDSCAL," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119, December.
    17. Antonio Calcagnì & Luigi Lombardi & Lorenzo Avanzi & Eduardo Pascali, 2020. "Multiple mediation analysis for interval-valued data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 347-369, February.
    18. Takane, Yoshio, 2016. "My Early Interactions with Jan and Some of His Lost Papers," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i07).
    19. Duncan Fong & Wayne DeSarbo & Zhe Chen & Zhuying Xu, 2015. "A Bayesian Vector Multidimensional Scaling Procedure Incorporating Dimension Reparameterization with Variable Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1043-1065, December.
    20. U.R. Orth & J. Turečková, 2002. "Segmenting the tourism market using perceptual and attitudinal mapping," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(1), pages 36-48.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:14:y:1987:i:1:p:67-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.