IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v51y2019i8p1684-1702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Failure to adjust†: Boston’s bid for the 2024 Olympics and the difficulties of learning Olympic wisdom

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Kassens-Noor

Abstract

Local resistance often cancels Olympic bids. Boston’s infamous bid failure was one of the first that demonstrated how local resistance can diminish boosters’ aspirations. As an insider to the bidding process, I trace the adjustment strategies of Boston’s bidding committee, B2024, to bid opposition over the course of Boston’s 2024 Olympic bid (2014–2015). I analyze the institutional learning that occurred and find B2024 learned through Olympic networks that won Olympic bids. These Olympic networks failed to learn amidst changing local circumstances and applied old solutions to new problems. While facing four crises, B2024 staff learned the complexities of Olympic bidding in a high-pressure learning environment that did not allow for trial and error. Against anti-Olympic movements, B2024 responded with fire-extinguishing techniques rather than plotting an organized strategy. While bidding, city governments must learn from failed bids to attain Olympic wisdom, which requires mastery of Olympic, counter-Olympic, and local knowledge. Using B2024’s learning process, I draw lessons for policy on learning and organizing complex projects with tight timelines and high uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Kassens-Noor, 2019. "“Failure to adjust†: Boston’s bid for the 2024 Olympics and the difficulties of learning Olympic wisdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1684-1702, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:51:y:2019:i:8:p:1684-1702
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19857104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19857104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X19857104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milena M. Parent & Darlene MacDonald & Gabriel Goulet, 2014. "The theory and practice of knowledge management and transfer: The case of the Olympic Games," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 205-218, April.
    2. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    3. Hugo Priemus & Bent Flyvbjerg & Bert van Wee (ed.), 2008. "Decision-Making on Mega-Projects," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4112.
    4. Parent, Milena M. & MacDonald, Darlene & Goulet, Gabriel, 2014. "The theory and practice of knowledge management and transfer: The case of the Olympic Games," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 205-218.
    5. Sue Halbwirth & Kristine Toohey, 2013. "Information, Knowledge and the Organization of the Olympic Games," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Stephen Frawley & Daryl Adair (ed.), Managing the Olympics, chapter 3, pages 33-49, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    2. Shilbury, David & O’Boyle, Ian & Ferkins, Lesley, 2016. "Towards a research agenda in collaborative sport governance," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 479-491.
    3. Mohd Zarir Yusoff* & Mohd Saiful Izwaan Saadon & Nurul Haqimin Salleh & Tomingan Kamaron & Hanafi Ahmad, 2018. "Literature Review on Determinants Affecting Knowledge Sharing," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 860-866:2.
    4. Martin Schnitzer & Kathrin Kronberger & Filippo Bazzanella & Sebastian Wenger, 2020. "Analyzing Project Management Methods in Organizing Sports Events," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    5. Noor Alia Hanim Mohamad Hassan & Muhd Nazri Muhamad Noor & Norhayati Hussin, 2017. "Knowledge Transfer Practice in Organization," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(8), pages 750-760, August.
    6. Román, Concepción & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Integration of HSR and air transport: Understanding passengers’ preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 129-141.
    7. Hugo Priemus & Marian Bosch-Rekveldt & Mendel Giezen, 2013. "Dealing with the complexity, uncertainties and risk of megaprojects: redundancy, resilience and adaptivity," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 5, pages 83-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Cathy Macharis & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Multi-actor and multi-criteria analysis in evaluating mega-projects," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 11, pages 242-266, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Knut Samset, 2013. "Strategic and tactical performance of mega-projects – between successful failures and inefficient successes," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 2, pages 11-33, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh, 2021. "Lessons Learned, Barriers, and Improvement Factors for Mega Building Construction Projects in Developing Countries: Review Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    12. Rothengatter, Werner, 2019. "Megaprojects in transportation networks," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Martijn Leijten, 2013. "Real-world decision-making on mega-projects: politics, bias and strategic behaviour," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 4, pages 57-82, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Bert van Wee & Piet Rietveld, 2013. "CBA: ex ante evaluation of mega-projects," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 12, pages 269-290, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2013. "Why Mass Media Matter to Planning Research: The Case of Megaprojects," Papers 1304.1665, arXiv.org.
    16. Thomopoulos, N. & Grant-Muller, S. & Tight, M.R., 2009. "Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 351-359, November.
    17. Matthias Fleischer & Maximilian Fuhrmann & Christoph Haferburg & Fred Krüger, 2013. "“Festivalisation” of Urban Governance in South African Cities: Framing the Urban Social Sustainability of Mega-Event Driven Development from Below," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Carl Koopmans & Piet Rietveld, 2013. "Long-term impacts of mega-projects: the discount rate," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 14, pages 313-332, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Ihsan Issa Ahmad Hosani & Fikri T. Dweiri & Udechukwu Ojiako, 0. "A study of cost overruns in complex multi-stakeholder road projects in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-10.
    20. Lundberg, Mattias & Jenpanitsub, Anchalee & Pyddoke, Roger, 2011. "Cost overruns in Swedish transport projects," Working papers in Transport Economics 2011:11, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:51:y:2019:i:8:p:1684-1702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.