IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i9p1885-1901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids?

Author

Listed:
  • John Lauermann

Abstract

However it may be defined, urban ‘development’ typically implies the production of durable legacies. Yet these legacies are often planned through contingent, temporary projects. The role of temporary projects in implementing urban development is often interpreted in linear fashion: projects are viewed as isolated events which incrementally work toward already-existing development agendas. I argue instead that temporary projects play a recursive role in development planning: interpreted as a series of interlinked projects, they not only support but also redefine agendas for durable development. I focus on one type of temporary project: (failed) bids to host the Olympics, which I assess through a comparative 20-year sample of bids and through case studies of failed bids in Doha (Qatar) and New York (USA). I show that event-led development planning leverages project contingency and policy failure to construct long-term development agendas, as cities bid multiple times and recycle plans across projects. The paper contributes to debates over the long-term impacts of speculation and experimentation in urban governance, by assessing the role of contingency in urban politics. Temporariness is an asset in urban politics which can be used to mitigate risk in speculative development planning: since Olympic bids often fail to secure hosting rights, references to the possibility of failure can insulate project planners from critique.

Suggested Citation

  • John Lauermann, 2016. "Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1885-1901, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:9:p:1885-1901
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015585460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015585460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015585460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Vanwynsberghe & Björn Surborg & Elvin Wyly, 2013. "When the Games Come to Town: Neoliberalism, Mega-Events and Social Inclusion in the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2074-2093, November.
    2. Harald Bathelt & Nina Schuldt, 2008. "Between Luminaires and Meat Grinders: International Trade Fairs as Temporary Clusters," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 853-868.
    3. Mike Raco, 2014. "Delivering Flagship Projects in an Era of Regulatory Capitalism: State-led Privatization and the London Olympics 2012," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 176-197, January.
    4. Menno Van Der Veen & Willem K. Korthals Altes, 2012. "Contracts and Learning in Complex Urban Projects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1053-1075, September.
    5. Heike C. Alberts, 2009. "Berlin's Failed Bid to Host the 2000 Summer Olympic Games: Urban Development and the Improvement of Sports Facilities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 502-516, June.
    6. Holger Preuss, 2004. "The Economics of Staging the Olympics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3473.
    7. David P. Dolowitz & David Marsh, 2012. "The Future of Policy Transfer Research," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 10(3), pages 339-345, September.
    8. David Harvey, 2007. "Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 610(1), pages 21-44, March.
    9. Hugo Priemus & Bent Flyvbjerg & Bert van Wee (ed.), 2008. "Decision-Making on Mega-Projects," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4112.
    10. Björn Surborg & Rob VanWynsberghe & Elvin Wyly, 2008. "Mapping the Olympic growth machine," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 341-355, December.
    11. Andrew Karvonen & Bas Heur, 2014. "Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 379-392, March.
    12. Dominic Power & Johan Jansson, 2008. "Cyclical Clusters in Global Circuits: Overlapping Spaces in Furniture Trade Fairs," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(4), pages 423-448, October.
    13. Roger Keil, 2009. "The urban politics of roll‐with‐it neoliberalization," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 230-245, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma Colven, 2020. "Thinking beyond success and failure: Dutch water expertise and friction in postcolonial Jakarta," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 961-979, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tina Haisch & Max-Peter Menzel, 2019. "Temporary Markets in a Global Economy: An Example of Three Basel Art Fairs," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_14, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2015. "Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 103-128, June.
    3. Tina Haisch & Max-Peter Menzel, 2023. "Temporary markets: Market devices and processes of valuation at three Basel art fairs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 237-254, March.
    4. Huasheng Zhu & Kebi Chen & Yunlong Lian, 2018. "Do Temporary Creative Clusters Promote Innovation in an Emerging Economy?—A Case Study of the Beijing Design Week," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Eva Kassens-Noor & John Lauermann, 2018. "Mechanisms of policy failure: Boston’s 2024 Olympic bid," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3369-3384, November.
    6. Martijn van den Hurk & Tuna Tasan-Kok, 2020. "Contractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance: Flexibility and leeway in urban regeneration projects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3217-3235, December.
    7. Erwin Van Tuijl & Leo Van den Berg, 2016. "Annual City Festivals as Tools for Sustainable Competitiveness: The World Port Days Rotterdam," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    9. Matthias Fleischer & Maximilian Fuhrmann & Christoph Haferburg & Fred Krüger, 2013. "“Festivalisation” of Urban Governance in South African Cities: Framing the Urban Social Sustainability of Mega-Event Driven Development from Below," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Jansson Johan, 2014. "Temporary events and spaces in the Swedish primary art market," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 202-215, October.
    11. Guillaume Favre & Julien Brailly, 2020. "Detachment as a privilege: industry participation at TV programming and distribution marketplaces," Post-Print hal-03256150, HAL.
    12. Harald Bathelt & Gang Zeng, 2014. "The Development of Trade Fair Ecologies in China: Case Studies from Chengdu and Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 511-530, March.
    13. Oliver Ibert, 2010. "Relational Distance: Sociocultural and Time–Spatial Tensions in Innovation Practices," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(1), pages 187-204, January.
    14. Cheng-Yi Lin, 2017. "The reputation-building process and spatial strategies of creative industries: A case study of product design firms in Taipei," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 186-204, January.
    15. James Faulconbridge & Sarah Hall, 2011. "Business Knowledges Within and Between the World City," Chapters, in: Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Geneviève Zembri-Mary & Virginie Engrand-Linder, 2023. "Urban planning law in the face of the Olympic challenge: Between innovation and criticism of exceptional urban regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 369-388, June.
    17. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo & Maria Rita Pierleoni, 2018. "Assessing The Olympic Games: The Economic Impact And Beyond," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 649-682, July.
    18. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Merlijn van Hulst, 2024. "Reimagining Urban Living Labs: Enter the Urban Drama Lab," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 991-1012, May.
    19. Kao-Lee Liaw & Lei Xu, 2013. "Changes in Wage Distributions of Wage Earners in Canada: 2000-2005," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 451, McMaster University.
    20. Bent Flyvbjerg & Allison Stewart & Alexander Budzier, 2016. "The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games," Papers 1607.04484, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:9:p:1885-1901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.