IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v43y2011i5p1135-1153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatization, Marketization, and Deprivation: Interpreting the Homeownership Paradox in Postreform Urban China

Author

Listed:
  • Guo Chen

    (Department of Geography and Global Urban Studies Program, Michigan State University, 211 Geography Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

Abstract

The paper examines the nature of the housing predicaments faced by China's urban poor since the advent of pro-ownership housing marketization in the 1990s. It is argued that housing deprivation in today's urban China is a complex problem which is difficult to disentangle based solely on the material outcomes of housing distribution and housing inequalities. Therefore, an integrative framework is proposed to examine the issue from the perspective of structure–agency interaction. Statistical methods are employed to identify the concrete market and nonmarket factors which constrain the housing decisions of Nanjing's poor families, based on census and household-survey data. Qualitative interviews are then utilized to help reconstruct and interpret different storylines of homeownership transition under the identified constraints. Findings suggest that the ownership-based housing model has been promoted among the poor in exploitative ways, which has resulted in profound deprivation—for both poor owners and nonowners. Alternative, nonownership housing options are urgently needed to address the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo Chen, 2011. "Privatization, Marketization, and Deprivation: Interpreting the Homeownership Paradox in Postreform Urban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1135-1153, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:5:p:1135-1153
    DOI: 10.1068/a43444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a43444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a43444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fulong Wu & Shenjing He, 2005. "Changes In Traditional Urban Areas And Impacts Of Urban Redevelopment: A Case Study Of Three Neighbourhoods In Nanjing, China," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(1), pages 75-95, February.
    2. Donggen Wang & Si-Ming Li, 2004. "Housing Preferences in a Transitional Housing System: The Case of Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 69-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donggen Wang & Jiukun Li & Harry Timmermans, 2004. "Measuring Bifurcation Points in Choice Behavior: Principles and Illustration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(6), pages 1125-1138, June.
    2. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    3. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Ali Cheshmehzangi, 2018. "The Changing Urban Landscape of Chinese Cities: Positive and Negative Impacts of Urban Design Controls on Contemporary Urban Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Cecilia Wong & Wei Zheng & Miao Qiao, 2020. "Urban expansion and neighbourhood commuting patterns in the Beijing metropolitan region: A multilevel analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2773-2793, October.
    6. Xiangming Chen & Jiaming Sun, 2007. "Untangling a Global–Local Nexus: Sorting Out Residential Sorting in Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(10), pages 2324-2345, October.
    7. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    8. Suhong Zhou & Zhidong Wu & Luping Cheng, 2013. "The Impact of Spatial Mismatch on Residents in Low-income Housing Neighbourhoods: A Study of the Guangzhou Metropolis, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1817-1835, July.
    9. Hyunjung Lee, 2019. "A Study on the Characteristics of New Towns and the Redevelopment of Project-Canceled Areas: A Case Study of Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Rohayu Ab Majid & Rosli Said, 2015. "Public Preferences towards Residential Placement in a Township Area: Case Study of Malaysia," LARES lares_2015_1196-1386-1-rv, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    11. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    12. Aline Chiabai & Stephen Platt & Wadim Strielkowski, 2014. "Eliciting Users' Preferences for Cultural Heritage and Tourism-Related E-Services: A Tale of Three European Cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 263-277, April.
    13. Zhiming Cheng, 2010. "Poverty in China’s Urban Communities," China Report, , vol. 46(2), pages 143-173, May.
    14. repec:cep:sticas:/130 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zheng Wang & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2016. "Intergroup neighbouring in urban China: Implications for the social integration of migrants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(4), pages 651-668, March.
    16. Hong Hu & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer, 2015. "Planning Support in Estimating Green Housing Opportunities for Different Socioeconomic Groups in Nanjing, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(2), pages 316-337, April.
    17. Shin, Hyun Bang, 2008. "Driven to swim with the tide?: urban redevelopment and community participation in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6194, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Marois, Guillaume & Lord, Sébastien & Morency, Catherine, 2019. "A mixed logit model analysis of residential choices of the young-elderly in the Montreal metropolitan area," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-149.
    19. Meimei Wang & Yongchun Yang & Mengqin Liu & Huailiang Yu, 2021. "Intergenerational Factors Influencing Household Cohabitation in Urban China: Chengdu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Li, Xin & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2017. "Ambivalence in Place Attachment: The Lived Experiences of Residents in Declining Neighbourhoods Facing Demolition in Shenyang, China," IZA Discussion Papers 10515, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Yang Hu & Rory Coulter, 2017. "Living space and psychological well-being in urban China: Differentiated relationships across socio-economic gradients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 911-929, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:5:p:1135-1153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.