IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v96y2005i1p75-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes In Traditional Urban Areas And Impacts Of Urban Redevelopment: A Case Study Of Three Neighbourhoods In Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • FULONG WU
  • SHENJING HE

Abstract

Since market‐oriented economy reform, China has experienced significant changes in urban landscapes and the internal structure of cities. Recent studies have provided some insightful understanding into urban changes at a macro‐scale, e.g. social and spatial segregation, the division between rural migrants and urban households, changes in land uses. To a lesser extent, urban changes are understood at the microscopic level of the neighbourhood. Urban (re)development has created many new urban landscapes. Meanwhile, traditional old urban areas still constitute a significant proportion of Chinese cities, and normally contain large concentrations of marginal population. Possessing the particular characteristics of long developing history, high population density, and low housing quality, traditional urban areas have also experienced different changes in the post‐reform period. This study, based on a field survey of three traditional urban areas in Nanjing, attempts to reveal the built environmental and socio‐economic changes which can be partly attributed to different levels of urban redevelopment. More importantly, the study highlights the significance of neighbourhood‐based social interaction to marginal population. Against the backdrop of massive urban displacement and rapid redevelopment, it is argued that the effect of dismantling neighbourhoods could be detrimental to a sustainable urban society and the positive social objectives should be seriously considered in the process of urban redevelopment.

Suggested Citation

  • Fulong Wu & Shenjing He, 2005. "Changes In Traditional Urban Areas And Impacts Of Urban Redevelopment: A Case Study Of Three Neighbourhoods In Nanjing, China," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(1), pages 75-95, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:96:y:2005:i:1:p:75-95
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00440.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00440.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00440.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fulong Wu & John Logan, 2016. "Do rural migrants ‘float’ in urban China? Neighbouring and neighbourhood sentiment in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 2973-2990, November.
    2. Hyunjung Lee, 2019. "A Study on the Characteristics of New Towns and the Redevelopment of Project-Canceled Areas: A Case Study of Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Qinran Yang & David Ley, 2019. "Residential relocation and the remaking of socialist workers through state-facilitated urban redevelopment in Chengdu, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2480-2498, September.
    4. Ali Cheshmehzangi, 2018. "The Changing Urban Landscape of Chinese Cities: Positive and Negative Impacts of Urban Design Controls on Contemporary Urban Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Zheng Wang & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2016. "Intergroup neighbouring in urban China: Implications for the social integration of migrants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(4), pages 651-668, March.
    6. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Zhiming Cheng, 2010. "Poverty in China’s Urban Communities," China Report, , vol. 46(2), pages 143-173, May.
    8. Li, Xin & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2017. "Ambivalence in Place Attachment: The Lived Experiences of Residents in Declining Neighbourhoods Facing Demolition in Shenyang, China," IZA Discussion Papers 10515, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Musharraf Cyan & Michael Price & Mark Rider, 2017. "Peshawar Uplift: The Effect of Urban Development on Citizens’ Perceptions," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1709, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    10. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    11. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    12. Guo Chen, 2011. "Privatization, Marketization, and Deprivation: Interpreting the Homeownership Paradox in Postreform Urban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1135-1153, May.
    13. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    14. Zheng Wang & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2017. "Neighbourhood cohesion under the influx of migrants in Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 407-425, February.
    15. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:96:y:2005:i:1:p:75-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.