IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v41y2009i8p1884-1902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unintended Segregation of Transnational Students in Central Melbourne

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Fincher

    (Department of Resource Management and Geography, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia)

  • Kate Shaw

    (Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia)

Abstract

Links between the rapid growth of tertiary students resident in a city and that city's gentrification have recently been proposed in a UK-based literature about ‘studentification’. These analyses frame student subjectivity, identity, and experience in particular ways—students are agents of urban change, propelling shifts in neighbourhood housing and entertainment submarkets in a manner that local host communities often resent. Consideration of the experiences of the students themselves, through the effects of the host society and the city on them, is less common. Based on research conducted in Melbourne, we focus on transnational students, who are seen as consumers for a major export industry. We use the voices of transnational students recently arrived in the city to make the claim that an unintended sociospatial segregation of these students is occurring, largely driven by institutional practices. Students' agency is fundamentally affected by their institutional context, which determines the conditions of their entry to Australia and to university there, their housing, and, to a remarkable degree, their opportunities for social interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Fincher & Kate Shaw, 2009. "The Unintended Segregation of Transnational Students in Central Melbourne," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(8), pages 1884-1902, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:8:p:1884-1902
    DOI: 10.1068/a41126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a41126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a41126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary E Thomas, 2005. "‘I Think it's Just Natural’: The Spatiality of Racial Segregation at a US High School," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(7), pages 1233-1248, July.
    2. Ash Amin, 2002. "Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 959-980, June.
    3. Elizabeth Olson & Rachel Silvey, 2006. "Transnational Geographies: Rescaling Development, Migration, and Religion," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(5), pages 805-808, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Brooks & Johanna Waters, 2018. "Signalling the ‘Multi-Local’ University? The Place of the City in the Growth of London-Based Satellite Campuses, and the Implications for Social Stratification," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naomi Priest & Yin Paradies & Angeline Ferdinand & Lobna Rouhani & Margaret Kelaher, 2014. "Patterns of Intergroup Contact in Public Spaces: Micro-Ecology of Segregation in Australian Communities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Siyu Chen & Ying Chang & Jack S. Benton & Bing Chen & Hongchen Hu & Jing Lu, 2024. "Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Behaviours in Community Gardens in China: An Evaluation of a Natural Experiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    4. Karien Dekker & Gideon Bolt, 2005. "Social Cohesion in Post-war Estates in the Netherlands: Differences between Socioeconomic and Ethnic Groups," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2447-2470, December.
    5. Lina Jamoul & Jane Wills, 2008. "Faith in Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2035-2056, September.
    6. Renia Ehrenfeucht & Marla Nelson, 2013. "Young Professionals as Ambivalent Change Agents in New Orleans after the 2005 Hurricanes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 825-841, March.
    7. Joanne Sharp & Venda Pollock & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 1001-1023, May.
    8. Großmann, Katrin & Franke, Robert & Henkel, Laura, 2021. "Erfahrungsbericht Segregationsanalysen, Teil 2: Empirische Befunde," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Steinführer, Annett & Porsche, Lars & Sondermann, Martin (ed.), Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung, volume 16, pages 258-274, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    9. Carol Vincent & Sarah Neal & Humera Iqbal, 2017. "Encounters with diversity: Children’s friendships and parental responses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1974-1989, June.
    10. Andrea Wigfield & Royce Turner, 2013. "The Development of the Good Relations Measurement Framework in Britain: A Template for Experiential Social Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 655-686, November.
    11. Eva (Evangelia) Papatzani, 2021. "Encountering Everyday Racist Practices: Sociospatial Negotiations of Immigrant Settlement in Athens, Greece," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 61-79, January.
    12. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    13. Paola Briata, 2017. "G. Marconi, E. Ostanel, I. B. Tauris (eds), reviewed by Paola Briata," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 137-139, January.
    14. Bruno Meeus & Luce Beeckmans & Bas van Heur & Karel Arnaut, 2020. "Broadening the Urban Planning Repertoire with an ‘Arrival Infrastructures’ Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 11-22.
    15. Susanne Wessendorf, 2019. "Migrant belonging, social location and the neighbourhood: Recent migrants in East London and Birmingham," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 131-146, January.
    16. OKEKE, Ijeoma Chinwe (Ph.D) & ALONTA, Gabriel Chidiebere, 2023. "Entrepreneurship Education And Informal Sector: Implications For Sustainable Economic Development," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 297-305, August.
    17. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    18. Gwen van Eijk, 2012. "Good Neighbours in Bad Neighbourhoods: Narratives of Dissociation and Practices of Neighbouring in a ‘Problem’ Place," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3009-3026, November.
    19. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    20. Dror Kochan, 2015. "Placing the Urban Village: A Spatial Perspective on the Development Process of Urban Villages in Contemporary China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 927-947, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:8:p:1884-1902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.