IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1047-d1433832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Behaviours in Community Gardens in China: An Evaluation of a Natural Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Chen

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Design School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Ying Chang

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Design School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Jack S. Benton

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Bing Chen

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Design School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Hongchen Hu

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Design School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Jing Lu

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Management, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

There is little robust quantitative evidence on how community gardens impact on physical activity and other health-related behaviours. This natural experiment study aimed to examine the effects of a community garden within a Chinese neighbourhood on health-related behaviours during the COVID-19 epidemic. The study design was a repeat cross-sectional pre–post study, assessing differences between the non-epidemic period and epidemic period. Camera-based systematic observations were conducted at two locations within a community garden. A total of 180 h of video recordings were collected and coded by two researchers during a “non-epidemic” period when there were no COVID-19 restrictions (120 h) and the “epidemic” when COVID-19 restrictions were implemented (60 h). Observations of these video recordings assessed the total number of users, physical activities (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous), social interactions (Connect), and people taking notice of the environment (Take Notice), followed by a breakdown of observed gender and age group. Data were analysed using paired t -tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, comparing outcomes during the epidemic period and non-epidemic period. Results showed a significant increase in total number of users during the epidemic, particularly in females, older adults and children. Sedentary and moderate physical activities were significantly higher during the epidemic period. The increase in the total number of users of the community garden during the 2022 epidemic outbreak in Suzhou shows the importance of community gardens as a primary space for outdoor activities. This robust natural experiment study demonstrated that the community garden contributed more to physical activity, such as walking, but less to interactions between people (connecting) or people–place interactions (taking notice of the environment). More natural experiment research on community gardens like this is needed to better understand how the health and well-being benefits of community gardens can be maximized.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Chen & Ying Chang & Jack S. Benton & Bing Chen & Hongchen Hu & Jing Lu, 2024. "Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Behaviours in Community Gardens in China: An Evaluation of a Natural Experiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1047-:d:1433832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash Amin, 2002. "Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 959-980, June.
    2. Jingxuan Hou & Long Chen & Enjia Zhang & Haifeng Jia & Ying Long, 2020. "Quantifying the usage of small public spaces using deep convolutional neural network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Iñigo Lorente-Riverola, 2019. "Rethinking third places. Informal public spaces and community building," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 507-508, October.
    4. Anna Gregis & Chiara Ghisalberti & Savino Sciascia & Francesco Sottile & Cristiana Peano, 2021. "Community Garden Initiatives Addressing Health and Well-Being Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Infodemiology Aspects, Outcomes, and Target Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bécares, Laia & Cormack, Donna & Harris, Ricci, 2013. "Ethnic density and area deprivation: Neighbourhood effects on Māori health and racial discrimination in Aotearoa/New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 76-82.
    2. Katy Bennett & Allan Cochrane & Giles Mohan & Sarah Neal, 2017. "Negotiating the educational spaces of urban multiculture: Skills, competencies and college life," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(10), pages 2305-2321, August.
    3. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    4. Karien Dekker & Gideon Bolt, 2005. "Social Cohesion in Post-war Estates in the Netherlands: Differences between Socioeconomic and Ethnic Groups," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2447-2470, December.
    5. Maria Budnik & Katrin Grossmann & Christoph Hedtke, 2021. "Migration-Related Conflicts as Drivers of Institutional Change?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 103-112.
    6. Yue Liu & Xiangmin Guo, 2024. "A Dynamic Prediction Framework for Urban Public Space Vitality: From Hypothesis to Algorithm and Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Sonia Stefanizzi & Valeria Verdolini, 2019. "Bordered communities: the perception of insecurity in five European cities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1165-1186, May.
    8. Anniken Førde, 2019. "Enhancing Urban Encounters: The Transformative Powers of Creative Integration Initiatives," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 44-52.
    9. Lina Jamoul & Jane Wills, 2008. "Faith in Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2035-2056, September.
    10. Renia Ehrenfeucht & Marla Nelson, 2013. "Young Professionals as Ambivalent Change Agents in New Orleans after the 2005 Hurricanes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 825-841, March.
    11. Huimin Du & Jing Song & Si-ming Li, 2021. "‘Peasants are peasants’: Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1598-1614, June.
    12. Kathy Burrell, 2016. "Lost in the ‘churn’? Locating neighbourliness in a transient neighbourhood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1599-1616, August.
    13. Gina Netto & Humphrey Abazie, 2013. "Racial Harassment in Social Housing in a Multi-ethnic City: The Case for Moving beyond Acting against Individual Perpetrators of Racial Harassment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 674-690, March.
    14. Joanne Sharp & Venda Pollock & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 1001-1023, May.
    15. Rikke Skovgaard Nielsen & Anne Hedegaard Winther, 2020. "The complexity of diversity in reality: Perceptions of urban diversity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2817-2832, November.
    16. Großmann, Katrin & Franke, Robert & Henkel, Laura, 2021. "Erfahrungsbericht Segregationsanalysen, Teil 2: Empirische Befunde," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Steinführer, Annett & Porsche, Lars & Sondermann, Martin (ed.), Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung, volume 16, pages 258-274, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    17. Carol Vincent & Sarah Neal & Humera Iqbal, 2017. "Encounters with diversity: Children’s friendships and parental responses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1974-1989, June.
    18. Andrea Wigfield & Royce Turner, 2013. "The Development of the Good Relations Measurement Framework in Britain: A Template for Experiential Social Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 655-686, November.
    19. Penny-Panagiota Koutrolikou, 2012. "Spatialities of Ethnocultural Relations in Multicultural East London: Discourses of Interaction and Social Mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(10), pages 2049-2066, August.
    20. Liling Huang, 2023. "Developing Place-Based Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Taipei City’s Jiuzhuang Community Garden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1047-:d:1433832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.