IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p195-d175384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signalling the ‘Multi-Local’ University? The Place of the City in the Growth of London-Based Satellite Campuses, and the Implications for Social Stratification

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Brooks

    (Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Johanna Waters

    (Department of Geography, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

Around 2009 some UK universities (based outside of the capital) began to open ‘satellite campuses’ in London. There are currently 14 such campuses at present, which have been developed primarily with an international student market in mind. Concerns have been raised, however, about the quality of teaching on these campuses and the fact that student attainment is ostensibly falling significantly below that for the ‘home’ campus. This project is the first of its kind to investigate, systematically, the ways in which universities are representing themselves in relation to these campuses (data include an analysis of prospectuses, YouTube content, websites and material garnered at open days). Using these data, we discuss the role that the City of London plays as a pivotal backdrop to these developments: the way it serves to substitute and compensate for lower levels of resources provided directly to the student from the university (here we consider accommodation, the outsourcing of teaching, the absence of a substantive campus environment and a general lack of focus on ‘pedagogical’ matters in almost all marketing materials). Instead, the universities place London at the front and centre of attempts to ‘sell’ the campus to potential students. The paper makes some innovative conceptual links between work in migration studies on the role and function of global cities in attracting workers and the way in which the city operates in this case to attract international students. These campuses feed into debates around the increasing inequalities evidenced as a consequence of the internationalisation of higher education, even when such developments are ostensibly ‘domestic’.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Brooks & Johanna Waters, 2018. "Signalling the ‘Multi-Local’ University? The Place of the City in the Growth of London-Based Satellite Campuses, and the Implications for Social Stratification," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:195-:d:175384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Fincher & Kate Shaw, 2009. "The Unintended Segregation of Transnational Students in Central Melbourne," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(8), pages 1884-1902, August.
    2. Jonathan V. Beaverstock & Sarah Hall, 2012. "Competing for talent: global mobility, immigration and the City of London's labour market," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 5(2), pages 271-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kleibert, Jana M., 2021. "Geographies of Marketization in Higher Education: Branch Campuses as Territorial and Symbolic Fixes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(4), pages 315-337.
    2. Anke Li & Chi Nguyen & Jinhee Choi, 2019. "“Because of the Christian Fellowship, I Decided to Stay”: How Participating in a Christian Community Shapes the Social Experiences of Chinese International Students," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Golebiowska, 2016. "Are Peripheral Regions Benefiting from National Policies Aimed at Attracting Skilled Migrants? Case Study of the Northern Territory of Australia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 947-971, August.
    2. Ceren Ozgen & Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 2013. "Measuring Cultural Diversity and its Impact on Innovation: Longitudinal Evidence from Dutch firms," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2013003, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
    3. Ceren Ozgen & Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 2017. "The elusive effects of workplace diversity on innovation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 29-49, March.
    4. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Peilei Fan, 2014. "Innovation In China," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 725-745, September.
    5. Dymski Gary & Gavris Maria & Huaccha Gissell, 2023. "Viewing the impact of Brexit on Britain’s financial centre through an historical lens: Can there be a third reinvention of the City of London?," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2-3), pages 76-91, August.
    6. Stefanie Föbker & Daniela Temme & Claus-C. Wiegandt, 2014. "Dossier: Institutions and skilled mobility. Guest Editors: Gery Nijenhuis & Maggi W.H. Leung," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(5), pages 542-557, December.
    7. Marieke Krijnen & David Bassens & Michiel van Meeteren, 2017. "Manning circuits of value: Lebanese professionals and expatriate world-city formation in Beirut," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2878-2896, December.
    8. Koikkalainen Saara, 2017. "Finnish Highly Skilled Migrants and the European Economic Crisis," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 168-181, October.
    9. Ozgur Sayin, 2022. "Istanbul: A Global, but Still Industrial, City," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 65(65), pages 329-349, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:195-:d:175384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.