IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v35y2003i12p2177-2190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transportation Impact Statement (TIS)—A New Tool for Transportation and Land-Use Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Eran Ben-Elia

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Technion, Technion City, Haifa, 32000, Israel)

  • Daniel Shefer

    (Center for Urban and Regional Studies, The Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel)

  • Yoram Shiftan

    (The Transportation Research Institute, The Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel)

Abstract

The authors advance a new approach to transportation and land-use planning: the transportation impact statement (TIS). Current planning practice suffers from a lack of understanding of and adequate tools to evaluate the complex relationships that exist between land use and transportation. Consequently, land-use development frequently overloads the transportation system. A TIS exposes the complex interdependencies with a multimodal and regional assessment of the impact of land-use development on the transportation system. The authors offer a theoretical background for this new approach and an empirical illustration of its potential use through a case study based on the city of Haifa in Israel. The objective of the study is to investigate the local and regional transport-related impacts of proposed land developments, thus improving the planning decisionmaking process. The impact of the proposed land developments on the transportation system was studied utilizing several transportation scenarios, including travel-demand management (TDM) strategies, using the metropolitan database and travel-demand modeling systems. The results show that the total number of trips generated by the proposed land developments is by far inconsistent with the capacity of the transportation network to accommodate all the forecasted demands under all transport scenarios. These results have a number of implications. First, TIS clearly improves our understanding of the impact of land development on the transportation system, and thus it should be utilized in decisionmaking regarding land-development strategy. Second, TIS stresses the importance of transit and TDM strategies as mitigation measures in the planning process. Third, TIS illustrates the need for a wider (that is, not site-related) planning perspective—including setting overall metropolitan goals and objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Eran Ben-Elia & Daniel Shefer & Yoram Shiftan, 2003. "Transportation Impact Statement (TIS)—A New Tool for Transportation and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(12), pages 2177-2190, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:35:y:2003:i:12:p:2177-2190
    DOI: 10.1068/a35239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a35239
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a35239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1995. "The Transportation-Land Use Connection Still Matters," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9sg3w7q5, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Wachs, Martin, 1993. "Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, Urban Form, and Air Quality," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2wv0h7rq, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. A Anas, 1984. "Discrete Choice Theory and the General Equilibrium of Employment, Housing, and Travel Networks in a Lowry-Type Model of the Urban Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(11), pages 1489-1502, November.
    4. Berechman, J & Small, K. A., 1987. "Modeling Land Use and Transportation: An Interpretive Review for Growth Areas," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5882r95w, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1995. "The Transportation-Land Use Connection Still Matters," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7x87v1zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Hansen, Mark & Gillen, David & Dobbins, Allison & Huang, Yuanlin & Puvathingal, Mohnish, 1993. "The Air Quality Impacts of Urban Highway Capacity Expansion: Traffic Generation and Land Use Change," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6zz3k76c, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Berechman, J. & Small, K. A., 1988. "Modeling Land Use and Transportation: An Interpretive Review for Growh Areas," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4nw2t7n5, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ben-Elia, Eran & Ettema, Dick, 2009. "Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour--a study of willingness to participate," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 68-76, March.
    2. te Brommelstroet, Marco, 2010. "Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 25-41.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W D Macmillan, 1993. "Urban and Regional Modelling: Getting it Done and Doing it Right," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 56-68, January.
    2. W A V Clark, 1993. "Applying our Understanding: Social Science in Government and the Marketplace," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 38-47, January.
    3. Dai, Danielle & Weinzimmer, David, 2014. "Riding First Class: Impacts of Silicon Valley Shuttles on Commute & Residential Location Choice," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2jr7z01q, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Myung-Jin Jun & Simon Choi & Frank Wen & Ki-Hyun Kwon, 2018. "Effects of urban spatial structure on level of excess commutes: A comparison between Seoul and Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 195-211, January.
    5. Giuliano, Genevieve & Small, Kenneth A., 1993. "Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2ss7x5b1, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Zhao, Pengjun & Lü, Bin & Roo, Gert de, 2011. "Impact of the jobs-housing balance on urban commuting in Beijing in the transformation era," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-69.
    7. Y J Gur & D Shefer & D Magid, 1996. "Road Capacity Driven Land Use Model (CADLUM)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(12), pages 2227-2240, December.
    8. Handy, Susan, 2002. "Smart Growth and The Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5kh4f7fp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Zhou, You & Zhang, Lingzhu & Chiaradia, Alain J F, 2021. "An adaptation of reference class forecasting for the assessment of large-scale urban planning vision, a SEM-ANN approach to the case of Hong Kong Lantau tomorrow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Kii, Masanobu & Nakanishi, Hitomi & Nakamura, Kazuki & Doi, Kenji, 2016. "Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 148-158.
    11. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    12. King, David A. & Fischer, Lauren Ames, 2016. "Streetcar projects as spatial planning: A shift in transport planning in the United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 383-390.
    13. Katarzyna Kopczewska & Mateusz Kopyt & Piotr Ćwiakowski, 2021. "Spatial Interactions in Business and Housing Location Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Seya, Hajime & Yoshida, Takahiro & Tsutsumi, Morito, 2016. "Ex-post identification of geographical extent of benefited area by a transportation project: Functional data analysis method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-10.
    15. Zhong-Ren Peng, 1997. "The Jobs-Housing Balance and Urban Commuting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(8), pages 1215-1235, July.
    16. Zhao, Pengjun, 2013. "The implications of and institutional barriers to compact land development for transportation: Evidence from Bejing," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(3), pages 29-42.
    17. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Reilly, Michael & Landis, John, 2003. "The Influence of Built-Form and Land Use on Mode Choice," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt46r3k871, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Pengjun Zhao, 2014. "The Impact of the Built Environment on Bicycle Commuting: Evidence from Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 1019-1037, April.
    20. Genevieve Giuliano & Kenneth A. Small, 1993. "Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(9), pages 1485-1500, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:35:y:2003:i:12:p:2177-2190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.