IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v31y1999i10p1825-1838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Visualisation and the Exploratory Analysis of Area Data

Author

Listed:
  • S Wise
  • R Haining
  • P Signoretta

Abstract

Area data are commonly used in many social science disciplines, but have a number of characteristics which have necessitated the development of specialist tools for analysis and display. In this paper we discuss the application to area data of exploratory analysis methods and visualisation techniques, and in particular the growing number of software packages which provide visualisation methods to support exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA). In the exploratory analysis of nonspatial data, the data are often considered to consist of rough and smooth elements. If this idea is extended to spatial data, it can be argued that a software system for ESDA should have facilities for exploring the rough and smooth elements of both the spatial and nonspatial elements of the data. Visualisation techniques can assist with this by providing a wide range of graphical displays, in a highly interactive environment. Conceptual frameworks are developed for both ESDA and scientific visualisation, and four software packages that link graphical and cartographical views of the data are reviewed against these requirements. The packages fall into two broad groups. In one, the emphasis is on highly interactive graphics, but with few numerical methods or tools for exploring the spatial properties of the data. In the other, specialist spatial tools are provided, but the graphical tools are less flexible. It is argued that a combination of both approaches would provide a package which more fully satisfied the requirements of ESDA. The need to assess the effectiveness of different visualisation techniques in supporting and encouraging the exploratory analysis of spatial data is noted.

Suggested Citation

  • S Wise & R Haining & P Signoretta, 1999. "Scientific Visualisation and the Exploratory Analysis of Area Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(10), pages 1825-1838, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:31:y:1999:i:10:p:1825-1838
    DOI: 10.1068/a311825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a311825
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a311825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luc Anselin & Shuming Bao, 1997. "Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis Linking SpaceStat and ArcView," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, chapter 3, pages 35-59, Springer.
    2. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 1997. "Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03499-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ángeles Sánchez & Jorge Chica-Olmo & Juan de Dios Jiménez-Aguilera, 2018. "A Space–Time Study for Mapping Quality of Life in Andalusia During the Crisis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 699-728, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael F. Goodchild & Luc Anselin & Richard P. Appelbaum & Barbara Herr Harthorn, 2000. "Toward Spatially Integrated Social Science," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 139-159, April.
    2. Ferhan Gezici & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2007. "Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 383-403, April.
    3. Luc Anselin, 2012. "From SpaceStat to CyberGIS," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 131-157, April.
    4. repec:asg:wpaper:1047 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Alex Braithwaite & QUAN LI, 2007. "Transnational Terrorism Hot Spots: Identification and Impact Evaluation," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(4), pages 281-296, September.
    6. repec:asg:wpaper:1012 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. M'HENNI, Hatem & METHAMEM, Raouchen, 2008. "Diffusion des TIC dans l’espace méditerranéen une explication géographique [ICT diffusion in the mediterranean space: a geographical explanation]," MPRA Paper 27550, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    9. Brigitte Waldorf, 2003. "Spatial Patterns and Processes in a Longitudinal Framework," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 269-288, July.
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:13:i06 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Rui Fragoso & Conceição Rego & Vladimir Bushenkov, 2016. "Clustering of Territorial Areas: A Multi-Criteria Districting Problem," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 14(2), pages 179-198, December.
    12. Montero Lorenzo, José María, 2004. "El precio medio del metro cuadrado de la vivienda libre: Una aproximación metodológica desde la perspectiva de la Geoestadística," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 1-18, Diciembre.
    13. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    14. repec:jss:jstsof:47:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    16. Shortt, Niamh K. & Moore, Adrian & Coombes, Mike & Wymer, Colin, 2005. "Defining regions for locality health care planning: a multidimensional approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2715-2727, June.
    17. Alan T. Murray, 2010. "Quantitative Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 143-163, February.
    18. Maria del Carmen Pérez González & Lidia Valiente Palma, 2020. "The “business–territory” relationship of cooperative societies as compared to the conventional business sector in the region of Andalusia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(4), pages 565-583, December.
    19. Rachel Guillain & Julie Le Gallo, 2010. "Agglomeration and Dispersion of Economic Activities in and around Paris: An Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(6), pages 961-981, December.
    20. Antonio Páez & Takashi Uchida & Kazuaki Miyamoto, 2002. "A General Framework for Estimation and Inference of Geographically Weighted Regression Models: 1. Location-Specific Kernel Bandwidths and a Test for Locational Heterogeneity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(4), pages 733-754, April.
    21. Rui António Ramos & Antônio Nélson Silva & Vasco Miranda, 2004. "A comparison of two methods for the definition of Regional Metropolitan Areas through an application in the North of Portugal," ERSA conference papers ersa04p488, European Regional Science Association.
    22. Miryam S. Merk & Philipp Otto, 2022. "Estimation of the spatial weighting matrix for regular lattice data—An adaptive lasso approach with cross‐sectional resampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), February.
    23. Thomas de Graaff & Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Peter Nijkamp & Aura Reggiani, 1998. "Diagnostic Tools for Nonlinearity in Spatial Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-072/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    24. Oğuz Işik & M. Melih Pinarcioğlu, 2006. "Geographies of a silent transition: a geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey [Géographie d’une transition silencieuse: une approche des différences ," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 399-421, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:31:y:1999:i:10:p:1825-1838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.