IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/regeco/v14y1984i1p19-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manhattan versus Euclid : Market areas computed and compared

Author

Listed:
  • Von Hohenbalken, Balder
  • West, Douglas S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Von Hohenbalken, Balder & West, Douglas S., 1984. "Manhattan versus Euclid : Market areas computed and compared," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 19-35, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:regeco:v:14:y:1984:i:1:p:19-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166-0462(84)90040-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    2. Phipps Arabie, 1991. "Was euclid an unnecessarily sophisticated psychologist?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 567-587, December.
    3. Isabel Pilar Albaladejo Pina, 1995. "Cinco líneas metodológicas para la delimitación de las áreas de mercado," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 4, pages 5-27, Diciembre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:regeco:v:14:y:1984:i:1:p:19-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/regec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.