IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v29y1997i7p1257-1274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply-Chain Dynamics, Environmental Issues, and Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • K E Hill

    (Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester Ml 5GD, England)

Abstract

Concern about environmental issues and pressure on manufacturing firms to decrease their environmental impact have both intensified since the early 1980s. At present legislation is the most significant source of environmental pressure on firms, but it is the government's intention that voluntary nonlegislative measures will play a much greater role in the future. Pressure through the supply chain is one possible mechanism for achieving this objective, although relatively little is known about its environmental role or importance for manufacturing firms. The author outlines the supply-chain concept, and examines its current significance as a source of environmental pressure. The nature of any supply-chain pressure experienced by a cross section of manufacturing firms in Yorkshire and Humberside, and their actual responses to it, are considered. This investigation reveals that, because of their economic importance, environmental pressure from customers has the potential to be significant. However, in practice such pressure only tends to affect chemical firms and those firms in the consumer-goods sectors which have experienced green consumer pressure directly. Industrial customers, with the exception of a minority of large firms and multinational corporations, generally show little interest in the environmental implications of their sales and purchasing. Environmental legislation is confirmed as by far the most important pressure forcing firms to mitigate their environmental impact. The policy implications of these findings for any move away from reliance on environmental legislation towards voluntary controls are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • K E Hill, 1997. "Supply-Chain Dynamics, Environmental Issues, and Manufacturing Firms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(7), pages 1257-1274, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:29:y:1997:i:7:p:1257-1274
    DOI: 10.1068/a291257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a291257
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a291257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Bebbington & Rob Gray, 1993. "Corporate accountability and the physical environment: Social responsibility and accounting beyond profit," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Denis Smith, 1992. "Strategic management and the business environment: What lies beyond the rhetoric of greening?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Jacqueline Cramer, 1996. "Experiences With Implementing Integrated Chain Management In Dutch Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 38-47, March.
    4. Richard Welford, 1992. "Linking quality and the environment: A strategy for the implementation of environmental management systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 25-34, March.
    5. Ginley, Douglas M, 1994. "Material flows in the transport industry : An example of industrial metabolism," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 169-181, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cruz, Jose M., 2008. "Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1005-1031, February.
    2. Ravi Shankar Kumar & Alok Choudhary & Soudagar A. K. Irfan Babu & Sri Krishna Kumar & A. Goswami & M. K. Tiwari, 2017. "Designing multi-period supply chain network considering risk and emission: a multi-objective approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 427-461, March.
    3. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong Michelle, 2019. "The sustainable supply chain network competition with environmental tax policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 218-231.
    4. Lee, Hsiao-Hui & Nunez, Manuel & Cruz, Jose, 2018. "Competition for limited critical resources and the adoption of environmentally sustainable strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1130-1143.
    5. Cruz, Jose M. & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2008. "Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 61-74, November.
    6. Dai, Feng & Li, Pengpeng & Liang, Ling, 2016. "Long-term economic growth under environmental pressure: An optimal path," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 15-24.
    7. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keijo Räsänen & Susan Meriläinen & Raimo Lovio, 1994. "Pioneering descriptions of corporate greening: Notes and doubts on the emerging discussion," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 9-16.
    2. Ola Bergström & Peter Dobers, 2000. "Organizing sustainable development: from diffusion to translation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 167-179.
    3. David Wheeler, 1992. "BSE briefing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(4), pages 37-40, December.
    4. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Mark Shenkin & Andrea B. Coulson, 2007. "Accountability through activism: learning from Bourdieu," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 297-317, April.
    6. Franck Aggeri & Morgane Le Breton, 2016. "The regulation of transparency in the field of CSR," Post-Print halshs-01368029, HAL.
    7. Carter, Chris & Clegg, Stewart & Wåhlin, Nils, 2011. "When science meets strategic realpolitik: The case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 682-697.
    8. Walter J. V. Vermeulen & P. J. Ras, 2006. "The challenge of greening global product chains: meeting both ends," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(4), pages 245-256.
    9. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    10. Simon Atkinson & Anja Schaefer & Howard Viney, 2000. "Organizational structure and effective environmental management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 108-120, March.
    11. Sime Curkovic & Robert Landeros, 2000. "An Environmental Baldrige?," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 15(2), pages 63-76.
    12. Francisco Ascui & Theodor F. Cojoianu, 2019. "Implementing natural capital credit risk assessment in agricultural lending," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1234-1249, September.
    13. Vera Ferrón Vílchez & Nicole Darnall, 2016. "Two are Better Than One: The Link Between Management Systems and Business Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 221-240, May.
    14. Eva Heiskanen, 2000. "Managers' interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 239-254, July.
    15. Peter Dobers, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility: management and methods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 185-191, July.
    16. Frank Boons, 1998. "Caught in the web: the dual nature of networks and its consequences," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 204-212, September.
    17. Antonio Corvino & Silvio Bianchi Martini & Federica Doni, 2021. "Extinction accounting and accountability: Empirical evidence from the west European tissue industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2556-2570, July.
    18. Kandelaars, Patricia P.A.A.H. & Dam, Jan D. van, 1998. "An analysis of variables influencing the material composition of automobiles," Serie Research Memoranda 0051, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    19. Mark Stubbs, 2000. "Action, knowledge and business–environment research: a case for grounded constitutive process theories and a sense of audience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 24-35, January.
    20. Frank Birkin & Helle Bank Jørgensen, 1994. "Tales in two countries: An insight into corporate environmental reporting in Denmark and the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 10-15.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:29:y:1997:i:7:p:1257-1274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.