IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v38y2017i6p177-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost, Contractors and Scale: An Empirical Analysis of the California Solar Market

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Mauritzen

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents an empirical analysis of the rapidly growing California rooftop solar photovoltaic market using detailed data of over 100,000 solar installations between 2007 and 2014. The rapid fall in the cost of solar panels stand central in the expansion of this market. I use a semi-parametric regression model to aid identification of cost factors by decomposing time-varying and cross-sectional components. I find that the use of Chinese manufactured panels are associated with costs that are 6% lower. Economies of scale at the local level (number of yearly installations in a zip code) and at the installation level (size of the installation) are also associated with lower costs. Higher subsidies, and higher contractor market-share are associated with higher costs. I use an exploratory analysis of the dominant contractor, SolarCity, to discuss non-cost factors in the expansion of the solar photovoltaic market.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Mauritzen, 2017. "Cost, Contractors and Scale: An Empirical Analysis of the California Solar Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(6), pages 177-197, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:177-197
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.38.6.jmau
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.38.6.jmau
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.38.6.jmau?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan E. Hughes & Molly Podolefsky, 2015. "Getting Green with Solar Subsidies: Evidence from the California Solar Initiative," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 235-275.
    2. Simon N. Wood, 2011. "Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(1), pages 3-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Mauritzen, 2017. "Cost, Contractors and Scale: An Empirical Analysis of the California Solar Market," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 6).
    2. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2018. "Tree-structured modelling of categorical predictors in generalized additive regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 737-758, September.
    3. Tommaso Luzzati & Angela Parenti & Tommaso Rughi, 2017. "Spatial error regressions for testing the Cancer-EKC," Discussion Papers 2017/218, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    4. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2020. "Deep and Proximate Determinants of the World Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(3), pages 677-710, September.
    5. Li, Yumin, 2018. "Incentive pass-through in the California Solar Initiative – An analysis based on third-party contracts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 534-541.
    6. Liu, Shen & Colson, Gregory & Hao, Na & Wetzstein, Michael, 2018. "Toward an optimal household solar subsidy: A social-technical approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 377-387.
    7. Longhi, Christian & Musolesi, Antonio & Baumont, Catherine, 2014. "Modeling structural change in the European metropolitan areas during the process of economic integration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 395-407.
    8. Palm, Alvar & Lantz, Björn, 2020. "Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: The effect of an information campaign in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Dillon T. Fogarty & Caleb P. Roberts & Daniel R. Uden & Victoria M. Donovan & Craig R. Allen & David E. Naugle & Matthew O. Jones & Brady W. Allred & Dirac Twidwell, 2020. "Woody Plant Encroachment and the Sustainability of Priority Conservation Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Daniel Melser & Robert J. Hill, 2019. "Residential Real Estate, Risk, Return and Diversification: Some Empirical Evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 111-146, July.
    11. Tibebu, Tiruwork B. & Hittinger, Eric & Miao, Qing & Williams, Eric, 2022. "Roles of diffusion patterns, technological progress, and environmental benefits in determining optimal renewable subsidies in the US," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. repec:grz:wpaper:2014-05 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ronald E. Gangnon & Natasha K. Stout & Oguzhan Alagoz & John M. Hampton & Brian L. Sprague & Amy Trentham-Dietz, 2018. "Contribution of Breast Cancer to Overall Mortality for US Women," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 24-31, April.
    14. Yuko Araki & Atsushi Kawaguchi & Fumio Yamashita, 2013. "Regularized logistic discrimination with basis expansions for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease based on three-dimensional MRI data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 7(1), pages 109-119, March.
    15. Weishampel, Anthony & Staicu, Ana-Maria & Rand, William, 2023. "Classification of social media users with generalized functional data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Megan K. Jennings & Emily Haeuser & Diane Foote & Rebecca L. Lewison & Erin Conlisk, 2020. "Planning for Dynamic Connectivity: Operationalizing Robust Decision-Making and Prioritization Across Landscapes Experiencing Climate and Land-Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Robert J. Hill & Alicia N. Rambaldi & Michael Scholz, 2021. "Higher frequency hedonic property price indices: a state-space approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 417-441, July.
    18. Adam R. Pines & Bart Larsen & Zaixu Cui & Valerie J. Sydnor & Maxwell A. Bertolero & Azeez Adebimpe & Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch & Christos Davatzikos & Damien A. Fair & Ruben C. Gur & Raquel E. Gur & H, 2022. "Dissociable multi-scale patterns of development in personalized brain networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Marra, Giampiero & Wood, Simon N., 2011. "Practical variable selection for generalized additive models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2372-2387, July.
    20. Wenyi Lin & Jingjing Zou & Chongzhi Di & Dorothy D. Sears & Cheryl L. Rock & Loki Natarajan, 2023. "Longitudinal Associations Between Timing of Physical Activity Accumulation and Health: Application of Functional Data Methods," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 309-329, July.
    21. repec:irf:wpaper:010 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:38:y:2017:i:6:p:177-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.