IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v18y2017i3p406-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Commission’s use of consultation during policy formulation: The effects of policy characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Bart Van Ballaert

Abstract

This article asks to what extent the European Commission’s use of consultation depends on policy characteristics of the proposal being formulated. It examines all consultations organized during a formulation process and looks at the number of open consultations (online consultations) as well as the number of repeat consultations (expert groups, policy fora) by the total number of consultations. Three types of use of consultation are conceptualized. A multinomial logistic regression is performed on a cross-sectional sample of 150 policy proposals adopted between 2010 and 2014. Data are triangulated from official documents. The empirical analysis indicates that the Commission’s use of consultation depends on the complexity, newness, and salience of a proposal. These findings are also discussed in view of the 2015 reform of Better Regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart Van Ballaert, 2017. "The European Commission’s use of consultation during policy formulation: The effects of policy characteristics," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(3), pages 406-423, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:18:y:2017:i:3:p:406-423
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116517702004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116517702004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1465116517702004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglass C. North, 1990. "A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(4), pages 355-367, October.
    2. Bart Van Ballaert, 2015. "The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 139-150.
    3. Christine Quittkat, 2011. "The European Commission's Online Consultations: A Success Story?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 653-674, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglass C. North, 2016. "Institutions and Economic Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 61(1), pages 72-76, March.
    2. Joachim Ahrens & Patrick Jünemann, 2011. "Adaptive Efficiency and Pragmatic Flexibility: Characteristics of Institutional Change in Capitalism, Chinese-style," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2022. "Human resource policies and firm innovation: The moderating effects of economic and institutional context," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Tao, Qizhi & Li, Haoyu & Wu, Qun & Zhang, Ting & Zhu, Yingjun, 2019. "The dark side of board network centrality: Evidence from merger performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-232.
    5. López-Sáez, Pedro & Cruz-González, Jorge & Navas-López, Jose Emilio & Perona-Alfageme, María del Mar, 2021. "Organizational integration mechanisms and knowledge transfer effectiveness in MNCs: The moderating role of cross-national distance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    6. Claude Ménard, 2013. "Is Public-Private Partnership Obsolete? Assessing the Obstacles and Shortcomings of PPP," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00653090, HAL.
    7. Carolyn Kousky, 2014. "Managing shoreline retreat: a US perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 9-20, May.
    8. Thomas Quinn, 2005. "Leasehold or Freehold? Leader‐Eviction Rules in the British Conservative and Labour Parties," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(4), pages 793-815, December.
    9. Eric Ip, 2014. "The judicial review of legislation in the United Kingdom: a public choice analysis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 221-247, April.
    10. Andrew J Clarke & Jeffery A Jenkins & Kenneth S Lowande, 2017. "Tariff politics and congressional elections: exploring the Cannon Thesis," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(3), pages 382-414, July.
    11. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    12. Idunn Nørbech, 2024. "Does policy context matter for citizen engagement in policymaking? Evidence from the European Commission's public consultation regime," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 130-150, March.
    13. Rohe, Sebastian & Oltmer, Marie & Wolter, Hendrik & Gmeiner, Nina & Tschersich , Julia, 2022. "Forever Niche: Why do organic vegetable varieties not diffuse?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    14. Assad Ullah & Muhammad Anees & Zahid Ali & Muhammad Ayub Khan, 2018. "Economic Freedom and Private Capital Inflows in Selected South Asian Economies: A Dynamic Panel Data Evidence," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 7(1), pages 41-52, June.
    15. Randall S. Kroszner & Philip E. Strahan, 2001. "Obstacles to Optimal Policy: The Interplay of Politics and Economics in Shaping Bank Supervision and Regulation Reforms," NBER Chapters, in: Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn't, pages 233-272, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Saptarshi Purkayastha, 2015. "A Comment on the Extension of the OLI Framework to Emerging Economies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(2), pages 336-340, April.
    17. Luc Laeven, 2004. "The Political Economy of Deposit Insurance," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 26(3), pages 201-224, December.
    18. Sarah Arras & Jan Beyers, 2020. "Access to European Union Agencies: Usual Suspects or Balanced Interest Representation in Open and Closed Consultations?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 836-855, July.
    19. Jieun Lee & Hyung-Deok Shin & Saehwa Hong, 2021. "Servitization of Global Manufacturing Business," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 565-584, December.
    20. Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano & Ardanaz, Martín, 2010. "Political Institutions, Policymaking, and Economic Policy in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 1708, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:18:y:2017:i:3:p:406-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.