IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Nad)reprezentacja interesów w procesie kształtowania polityki publicznej na przykładzie obszaru prawno-autorskiego w Polsce

Author

Listed:
  • Vetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka

    (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa)

Abstract

Artykuł poświęcony jest problematyce reprezentacji interesów w procesie kształtowania polityki publicznej. W szczególności podejmuje kwestie związane z zarządzaniem regulacyjnym dotyczącym relacji z grupami interesu oraz strategii stosowanych przez interesariuszy w procesach konsultacyjnych. Ponadto omówiono rolę, jaką grupy interesu odgrywają w polityce publicznej. Analiza dotyczy działań polskich grup interesu w obszarze prawa autorskiego, który zasługuje na uwagę zarówno ze względu na różnorodność aktorów, jak i na asymetrię interesów. Przeprowadzona analiza pozwala stwierdzić, że działania podejmowane przez interesariuszy w zakresie wzmacniania reprezentacji swoich interesów prowadzą do "nadreprezentacji" tych interesów, co - przy braku odpowiednich mechanizmów zarządzania regulacyjnego w zakresie udziału stron w konsultacjach - zwiększa ryzyko wystąpienia zjawiska "zawłaszczania regulacji" przez podmioty. Dane zostały zebrane w ramach monitoringu legislacyjnego projektów ustaw prawno-autorskich procedowanych w latach 2013-2019, a także w toku wywiadów półustrukturyzowanych przeprowadzonych w latach 2015-2018. W celu zilustrowania strategii lobbingowych za-stosowano metodę analizy sieci społecznych.

Suggested Citation

  • Vetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka, 2020. "(Nad)reprezentacja interesów w procesie kształtowania polityki publicznej na przykładzie obszaru prawno-autorskiego w Polsce," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2471
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasiecki, Krzysztof, 2015. "Problemy partycypacji społecznej w Polsce i ich wpływ na politykę publiczną," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Amandine Crespy, 2014. "Deliberative Democracy and the Legitimacy of the European Union: A Reappraisal of Conflict," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 62, pages 81-98, April.
    3. Christine Quittkat, 2011. "The European Commission's Online Consultations: A Success Story?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 653-674, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Idunn Nørbech, 2024. "Does policy context matter for citizen engagement in policymaking? Evidence from the European Commission's public consultation regime," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 130-150, March.
    2. Sarah Arras & Jan Beyers, 2020. "Access to European Union Agencies: Usual Suspects or Balanced Interest Representation in Open and Closed Consultations?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 836-855, July.
    3. Adriana Bunea, 2015. "Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 281-299, June.
    4. repec:ers:ijebaa:v:v:y:2017:i:1:p:14-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jan Beyers & Sarah Arras, 2021. "Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 877-893, July.
    6. Plehwe, Dieter, 2017. "Social networks of influence in Europe - and beyond," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 147-157.
    7. A. Garcia-Lorenzo & J. Lopez-Rodriguez & J.M. Barreiro-Vinan, 2018. "Interest Groups Incentives to Cooperate in the Production of Information in the Context of the EU Policy-Making," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 794-804.
    8. Oliver Huwyler, 2020. "Interest groups in the European Union and their hiring of political consultancies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(2), pages 333-354, June.
    9. Adam William Chalmers, 2014. "In over their heads: Public consultation, administrative capacity and legislative duration in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 595-613, December.
    10. Matti Van Hecke & Peter Bursens & Jan Beyers, 2016. "You'll Never Lobby Alone. Explaining the Participation of Sub-national Authorities in the European Commission's Open Consultations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1433-1448, November.
    11. repec:ers:journl:v:v:y:2017:i:2:p:14-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Fink, Simon & Ruffing, Eva, 2020. "Learning in iterated consultation procedures – The example of the German electricity grid demand planning," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Hogan John, 2024. "Regulating more? Comparing Ireland’s original and amended lobbying legislation," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 72(2), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Beatrice Carella & Paolo Graziano, 2022. "Back to the Future in EU Social Policy? Endogenous Critical Junctures and the Case of the European Pillar of Social Rights," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 374-390, March.
    15. Bart Van Ballaert, 2017. "The European Commission’s use of consultation during policy formulation: The effects of policy characteristics," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(3), pages 406-423, September.
    16. Dieter Plehwe & Matthias Schlögl & Robert Müller & Katja Walher, 2012. "Europäisches Kräftemessen - europäische Kräfte messen," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 113, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    17. Bert Fraussen & Adrià Albareda & Caelesta Braun, 2020. "Conceptualizing consultation approaches: identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 473-493, September.
    18. Legutko-Kobus, Paulina, 2018. "Partycypacja jako element programowania rozwoju lokalnego," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Lyubov M. Dzyuba & Nataliia V. Fedorenko & Julia V. Fedorenko, 2017. "Mediation as an Alternative Method of Dispute Resolution in Business," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 21-30.
    20. Anne Rasmussen & Dimiter Toshkov, 2013. "The effect of stakeholder involvement on legislative duration: Consultation of external actors and legislative duration in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 366-387, September.
    21. Adriana Bunea, 2014. "Explaining Interest Groups' Articulation of Policy Preferences in the European Commission's Open Consultations: An Analysis of the Environmental Policy Area," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1224-1241, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reprezentacja interesów; grupy interesu; lobbing; prawo autorskie; kształtowanie polityki; konsultacje z interesariuszami;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K29 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Other
    • N44 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: 1913-
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • P14 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.