IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v28y2007i4p523-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Politics of Technology in the British Civil Service

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Fisher

    (Public and Commercial Services Union)

Abstract

This article examines why and how management of a department of the British civil service (`the Agency') has sought to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) to change the organization of a complex form of administrative casework. In contrast to optimistic Information Age arguments that new workplace technologies will tend to benefit workers as well as employers, it is shown that Agency management have sought to use the new ICTs to increase their control over staff. This has involved the reorganization of some telephone work into a call centre for the first time. It is shown that the aim of increasing control has been not only to intensify work, but also to establish a technical basis for a broader restructuring of terms and conditions of employment that it was hoped would involve a reduction in the costs and place-bound nature of Agency labour. The article identifies a number of political and technical factors that have constrained managers from realizing the control they originally sought, so compelling them to preserve a complex form of call working and related employment conditions that they had originally intended to radically change. The article concludes with a discussion of how the new technical systems within the Agency have altered power relations between managers and staff, how government is hoping to use such technologies to cut costs across all civil service departments, and where resistance to such change may come from.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Fisher, 2007. "The New Politics of Technology in the British Civil Service," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 28(4), pages 523-551, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:28:y:2007:i:4:p:523-551
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X07082125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X07082125
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X07082125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Duncan, 2001. "The Impact of Two Decades of Reform of British Public Sector Industrial Relations," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 27-34, January.
    2. Simon Clarke, 1988. "Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 88, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Fisher, 2004. "The Crisis of Civil Service Trade Unionism: A Case Study of Call Centre Development in a Civil Service Agency," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(1), pages 157-177, March.
    2. Sarımehmet Duman, Özgün, 2022. "A thorough look into the state-market divide: depoliticisation of privatisation in post-crisis Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114448, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Imre Gergely Szabó & Marta Kahancová, 2012. "Acting on the Edge of Public Sector: Hospital Corporatization and Collective Bargaining in Hungary and Slovakia," Discussion Papers 1, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    4. A Leyshon & A Tickell, 1994. "Money Order? The Discursive Construction of Bretton Woods and the Making and Breaking of Regulatory Space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(12), pages 1861-1890, December.
    5. Rachel Friedman & Gillad Rosen, 2020. "The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 959-975, April.
    6. Philip McMichael & David Myhre, 1990. "Global Regulation vs. the Nation-State: Agro-Food Systems and the New Politics of Capital," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 22(1), pages 59-77, March.
    7. Pierre Filion, 2015. "Suburban Inertia: The Entrenchment of Dispersed Suburbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 633-640, May.
    8. Annina Kaltenbrunner & Elif Karaçimen & Joel Rabinovich, 2023. "The changing financial practises of Brazilian and Turkish firms under financial subordination, a mixed-methods analysis," Working Papers PKWP2306, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    9. Plomien, Ania & Schwartz, G, 2020. "Labour mobility in transnational Europe: between depletion, mitigation and citizenship entitlements harm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103955, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Pınar E Dönmez, 2021. "Against austerity and repression: Historical and contemporary manifestations of progressive politicisation in Turkey," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 512-535, May.
    11. Paul Smith & Gary Morton, 1993. "Union Exclusion and the Decollectivization of Industrial Relations in Contemporary Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 97-114, March.
    12. J Gough, 1996. "Not Flexible Accumulation—Contradictions of Value in Contemporary Economic Geography: 2. Regional Regimes, National Regulation, and Political Strategy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(12), pages 2179-2200, December.
    13. A Leyshon & N J Thrift, 1992. "Liberalisation and Consolidation: The Single European Market and the Remaking of European Financial Capital," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(1), pages 49-81, January.
    14. Chris O’Kane, 2020. "Capital, the State, and Economic Policy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 684-692, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:28:y:2007:i:4:p:523-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.