IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v19y2005i2p157-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation in Property Tax Abatement Programs Among States

Author

Listed:
  • Esteban G. Dalehite

    (Indiana University, Bloomington)

  • John L. Mikesell

    (Indiana University, Bloomington)

  • C. Kurt Zorn

    (Indiana University, Bloomington)

Abstract

This research provides an exhaustive review of U.S. property tax abatement programs and identifies and compares critical structural differences of abatement programs across states. Program differences are much greater than the existing literature recognizes. As a result, perhaps the most comprehensive database on the diversity of property tax abatements is offered to practitioners who are considering the design of a new abatement program or the revision of an existing one, as well as to researchers interested in furthering research on the effectiveness of this policy tool. For each of the identified abatement program features, advantages and disadvantages are discussed in light of existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Esteban G. Dalehite & John L. Mikesell & C. Kurt Zorn, 2005. "Variation in Property Tax Abatement Programs Among States," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 19(2), pages 157-173, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:19:y:2005:i:2:p:157-173
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242404272352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242404272352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242404272352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, John E. & Wassmer, Robert W., 1995. "The decision to 'bid for business': Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 739-757, December.
    2. Timothy J. Bartik, 1991. "Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number wbsle, November.
    3. John E. Anderson & Robert W. Wassmer, 2000. "Bidding for Business: The Efficacy of Local Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number bb, November.
    4. Peter S. Fisher, 1997. "Tax and spending incentives and enterprise zones," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Mar, pages 109-138.
    5. Beck, John H., 1993. "Tax abatement and tax rates in a system of overlapping revenue-maximizing governments," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 645-665, November.
    6. Robert W. Wassmer, 1992. "Property Tax Abatement and the Simultaneous Determination of Local Fiscal Variables in a Metropolitan Area," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 263-282.
    7. Timothy J. Bartik, 2000. "Jobs, Productivity, and Local Economic Development: What Implications Does Economic Research Have for the Role of Government?," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Robert W. Wassmer (ed.),Readings in Urban Economics: Issues and Public Policy, pages 72-122, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    8. Michael Wasylenko, 1997. "Taxation and economic development: the state of the economic literature," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Mar, pages 37-52.
    9. Robert W. Wassmer & John E. Anderson, 2001. "Bidding for Business: New Evidence on the Effect of Locally Offered Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(2), pages 132-148, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, John E., 2012. "State Tax Rankings: What Do They and Don’t They Tell Us?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(4), pages 985-1010, December.
    2. Scott Loveridge & Janet Bokemeier & Peter Kakela & Elan Satriawan, 2010. "Are All Discount Rates Equal? A Note On Time Preferences Across Public And Private Benefits In Michigan'S Upper Peninsula," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 858-871, October.
    3. Kenyon, Daphne A. & Langley, Adam H. & Paquin, Bethany P., 2012. "Property Tax Incentive Pitfalls," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1021, December.
    4. Elaine B. Sharp & Kevin Mullinix, 2012. "Holding Their Feet to the Fire," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(2), pages 138-150, May.
    5. William Spelman, 2006. "Growth, Stability, and the Urban Portfolio," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(4), pages 299-316, November.
    6. Tammy Leonard & Xi Yang & Lei Zhang & Connor Reed, 2020. "Impact of Property Tax Abatement on Employment Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(2), pages 209-221, May.
    7. Frank Peck & Simon Parry & Gail Mulvey & Keith Jackson & Ignazio Cabras & Jacqui Jackson, 2014. "The Role and Significance of Rates Relief for Supporting Businesses in Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(6), pages 982-999, December.
    8. Daphne Kenyon & Robert Wassmer & Adam Langley & Bethany Paquin, 2020. "The Effects of Property Tax Abatements on School District Property Tax Bases and Rates," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(3), pages 227-241, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix, R. Alison & Hines, James R., 2013. "Who offers tax-based business development incentives?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 80-91.
    2. Jeffrey Thompson, 2010. "Prioritizing Approaches to Economic Development in New England: Skills, Infrastructure, and Tax Incentives," Published Studies priorities_september7_per, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    3. Raphael W. Bostic & Allen C. Prohofsky, 2006. "Enterprise Zones and Individual Welfare: A Case Study of California," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 175-203, May.
    4. Carlianne Patrick, 2014. "Does Increasing Available Non-Tax Economic Development Incentives Result in More Jobs?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(2), pages 351-386, June.
    5. Christine Ryan & John Wilson & William Fulton, 2003. "The Impact of Urban Growth Boundaries on Future Urbanization," Working Paper 8610, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    6. Jasper Beekmans & Huub Ploegmakers & Karel Martens & Erwin van der Krabben, 2016. "Countering decline of industrial sites: Do local economic development policies target the neediest places?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3027-3047, November.
    7. Tammy Leonard & Xi Yang & Lei Zhang & Connor Reed, 2020. "Impact of Property Tax Abatement on Employment Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(2), pages 209-221, May.
    8. Laura A. Reese, 2014. "The Alchemy of Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(3), pages 206-219, August.
    9. Richard Funderburg & Joshua Drucker & David Merriman & Rachel Weber, 2021. "Is Tax Competition Strategic? Spatial Distributions of Business Property Tax Abatements in the Chicago Suburbs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(1), pages 66-83, February.
    10. Thomas M Fullerton Jr, 2004. "Empirical Evidence Regarding El Paso Property Tax Abatements: 1988-2001," Public Economics 0405007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Richard M. Vogel, 2000. "Relocation Subsidies: Regional Growth Policy or Corporate Welfare?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 437-447, September.
    12. Philippe Van Cauwenberge & Peter Beyne & Heidi Vander Bauwhede, 2016. "An empirical investigation of the influence of municipal fiscal policy on firm growth," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1825-1842, December.
    13. Robert W. Wassmer & John E. Anderson, 2001. "Bidding for Business: New Evidence on the Effect of Locally Offered Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(2), pages 132-148, May.
    14. Teresa Garcia-Milà & Therese J. McGuire, 2001. "Tax incentives and the city," Economics Working Papers 631, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2001.
    15. Hernández-Murillo, Rubén, 2019. "Interjurisdictional competition with adverse selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-95.
    16. Robert W. Wassmer, 2002. "Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1307-1327, July.
    17. Timothy J. Bartik, 2009. "The Revitalization of Older Industrial Cities: A Review Essay of Retooling for Growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Hongbo Wang, 2016. "The Texas economic model, miracle or mirage? A spatial hedonic analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(2), pages 393-417, March.
    19. Dan S. Rickman, 2013. "Should Oklahoma Be More Like Texas? A Taxing Decision," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-22, Summer.
    20. John Deskins & Brian Hill, 2010. "State taxes and economic growth revisited: have distortions changed?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(2), pages 331-348, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:19:y:2005:i:2:p:157-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.