IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v40y2023i3p281-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A certain gamble: Institutional change, leader turnover, and their effect on rivalry termination

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J Saunders

Abstract

Previous research shows that leader turnover and change in a leader's winning coalition are associated with rivalry termination. However, this research often conflates change in leadership or winning coalition with more fundamental reform of the institutions governing the state. This article argues that only changes in a rival's governing institutions should lead to rivalry termination. Changes in leader preferences may lead to conciliatory policies, but provide no certainty regarding the sincerity or longevity of these policies. Fundamental changes to the institutions of a state alter the menu of policy options available to the leadership and are difficult to undo. Institutional reform in Rival A makes the leadership of Rival B more willing to undertake potentially risky cooperative action, leading to rivalry termination. I test this argument in a dataset of rivalry terminations spanning 1919–2010, finding that institutional reform in one rival leads to an increase in the likelihood of rivalry termination regardless of the issues of contention. Irregular leader turnover and change in a state's winning coalition have no effect. Further, in a break with previous research, I find that any institutional reform—toward autocracy, toward democracy or laterally—is associated with an increased likelihood of rivalry termination.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J Saunders, 2023. "A certain gamble: Institutional change, leader turnover, and their effect on rivalry termination," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 281-303, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:3:p:281-303
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942221092086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942221092086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942221092086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel S. Morey, 2011. "When War Brings Peace: A Dynamic Model of the Rivalry Process," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 263-275, April.
    2. Gary Goertz & Paul Diehl, 1995. "Taking “enduring” out of enduring rivalry: The rivalry approach to war and peace," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 291-308.
    3. Keele, Luke & Stevenson, Randolph T. & Elwert, Felix, 2020. "The causal interpretation of estimated associations in regression models," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Michael Colaresi, 2004. "When Doves Cry: International Rivalry, Unreciprocated Cooperation, and Leadership Turnover," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 555-570, July.
    5. Derekh Cornwell & Michael Colaresi, 2002. "Holy Trinities, Rivalry Termination, and Conflict," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 325-353, October.
    6. Prins, Brandon C. & Daxecker, Ursula E., 2008. "Committed To Peace: Liberal Institutions and the Termination of Rivalry," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 17-43, January.
    7. Haas, Mark L., 2007. "The United States and the End of the Cold War: Reactions to Shifts in Soviet Power, Policies, or Domestic Politics?," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(1), pages 145-179, January.
    8. Keele, Luke, 2010. "Proportionally Difficult: Testing for Nonproportional Hazards in Cox Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 189-205, April.
    9. Bryan Rooney, 2018. "Sources of Leader Support and Interstate Rivalry," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 969-983, September.
    10. Ward, Michael D. & Davis, David R., 1992. "Sizing up the Peace Dividend: Economic Growth and Military Spending in the United States, 1948–1996," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(3), pages 748-755, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David R. Dreyer, 2012. "Issue Intractability and the Persistence of International Rivalry," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(5), pages 471-489, November.
    2. Kentaro Sakuwa & William R Thompson, 2019. "On the origins, persistence and termination of spatial and positional rivalries in world politics: Elaborating a two-issue theory of conflict escalation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 203-225, September.
    3. Amanda A Licht, 2022. "Introducing Regular Turnover Details, 1960–2015: A dataset on world leaders’ legal removal from office," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(2), pages 277-285, March.
    4. Christoph Dworschak, 2024. "Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 462-476, May.
    5. Uk Heo & Min Ye, 2016. "Defense Spending and Economic Growth around the Globe: The Direct and Indirect Link," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 774-796, October.
    6. Gandrud, Christopher, 2015. "simPH: An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i03).
    7. Schuessler, Julian, 2024. "Causal analysis with observational data," OSF Preprints wam94, Center for Open Science.
    8. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Kang-Fu Chen, 2021. "How do peace dividends bring about human development and productivity?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 435-452, November.
    9. Xiao, Shufeng & Yu, Tianjiao, 2024. "Underperformance duration and R&D internationalization: Institutional contingencies in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    10. Higney, Anthony & Hanley, Nick & Moro, Mirko, 2022. "The lead-crime hypothesis: A meta-analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Philip Arestis & Hüseyin Şen & Ayşe Kaya, 2021. "On the linkage between government expenditure and output: empirics of the Keynesian view versus Wagner’s law," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 265-303, May.
    12. Mónica Domínguez & Juan Aparicio & Antonio Fonfria, 2024. "The defence economy: an assessment of productivity change in NATO countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(18), pages 2158-2175, April.
    13. McDonald Bruce D & Eger Robert J, 2010. "The Defense-Growth Relationship: An Economic Investigation into Post-Soviet States," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Sophia Fauser & Michael Gebel, 2023. "Labour Market Dualism and the Heterogeneous Wage Gap for Temporary Employment. A Multilevel Study across 30 Countries," LIS Working papers 853, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    15. Theresa Schroeder, 2017. "When Security Dominates the Agenda," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(3), pages 564-589, March.
    16. Mo Chen & Xuhua Hu & Jijian Zhang & Zhe Xu & Guang Yang & Zenan Sun, 2023. "Are Firms More Willing to Seek Green Technology Innovation in the Context of Economic Policy Uncertainty? —Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Jülide Yildirim & Nadir Öcal, 2016. "Military expenditures, economic growth and spatial spillovers," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 87-104, February.
    18. Alptekin, Aynur & Levine, Paul, 2012. "Military expenditure and economic growth: A meta-analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 636-650.
    19. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Siew Ling Yew, 2018. "The effect of military expenditure on growth: an empirical synthesis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1357-1387, November.
    20. Esther Hauk & Hannes Mueller, 2015. "Cultural Leaders and the Clash of Civilizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 59(3), pages 367-400, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:3:p:281-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.