IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v12y2024i3p400-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents of Electronic Shopping Cart Abandonment during Online Purchase Process

Author

Listed:
  • Ishani Patharia
  • Tanu Jain

Abstract

The present study synthesized the extant literature on electronic shopping cart abandonment (ESCA) for the last 22 years (2000–2022) using the PRISMA approach. This is one of the first studies that comprehensively synthesized the widely applied theories in the ESCA literature and the reasons for ESCA during the various stages of online shopping process (search stage, consideration stage, evaluation stage, and purchase stage). The findings suggest that Stimulus Organism Response theory, Cognitive Dissonance theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action are the most prominent theories used in the ESCA literature. Further, customers abandon the electronic shopping cart due to several personal factors (e.g., trust, experience), website features (e.g., perceived behavioral tracking), and product attributes (e.g., perceived service quality). This study gives a snapshot of knowledge gaps in the ESCA domain and suggests future research directions from multifarious perspectives i.e., theoretical underpinnings, contexts, and customer characteristics. For marketers, it provides insights on factors affecting ESCA at each stage of the online shopping process to develop stage wise pragmatic strategies like gamification on shopping websites, improving navigational aspects on websites, removing threats to customer privacy, and creating greater transparency to increase customer trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishani Patharia & Tanu Jain, 2024. "Antecedents of Electronic Shopping Cart Abandonment during Online Purchase Process," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 400-418, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:400-418
    DOI: 10.1177/22785337221148810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22785337221148810
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22785337221148810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang Liu & Jack T. Marchewka & Catherina Ku, 2004. "American and Taiwanese Perceptions Concerning Privacy, Trust, and Behavioral Intentions in Electronic Commerce," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 18-40, January.
    2. Wan-Ju Iris Franz, 2014. "Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations behind Shopping and Research Behaviors: Theory and Evidence," International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (IJABE), IGI Global, vol. 3(3), pages 17-30, July.
    3. Oliver, Richard L & DeSarbo, Wayne S, 1988. "Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 495-507, March.
    4. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    5. Huang, Guei-Hua & Korfiatis, Nikolaos & Chang, Chun-Tuan, 2018. "Mobile shopping cart abandonment: The roles of conflicts, ambivalence, and hesitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 165-174.
    6. Close, Angeline G. & Kukar-Kinney, Monika, 2010. "Beyond buying: Motivations behind consumers' online shopping cart use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 986-992, September.
    7. Farrah Zeba & Musarrat Shaheen & Raveesh Krishnankutty, 2020. "Hedonic and Utilitarian Values Behind Engagement of Online Consumers," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Wang, Siqi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Leong, Yee Choy & Choo, Wei Chong, 2022. "Thanks COVID-19, I'll reconsider my purchase: Can fear appeal reduce online shopping cart abandonment?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Bridges, Eileen & Florsheim, Renée, 2008. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 309-314, April.
    10. Carmen-Maria Albrecht & Stefan Hattula & Donald R. Lehmann, 2017. "The relationship between consumer shopping stress and purchase abandonment in task-oriented and recreation-oriented consumers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 720-740, September.
    11. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    12. Kapoor, Anuj Pal & Vij, Madhu, 2021. "Following you wherever you go: Mobile shopping ‘cart-checkout’ abandonment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    14. Zhao, Haichuan & Wang, Xuehua & Jiang, Lan, 2021. "To purchase or to remove? Online shopping cart warning pop-up messages can polarize liking and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 813-836.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Siqi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Leong, Yee Choy & Choo, Wei Chong, 2022. "Thanks COVID-19, I'll reconsider my purchase: Can fear appeal reduce online shopping cart abandonment?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Wang, Siqi & Lim, Xin-Jean & Luo, Xi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa, 2024. "To hesitate or not to hesitate: Can popularity cues minimize the hesitation to checkout in e-commerce?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Li, Chenxi & Chen, Jing (Elaine) & Peng, Siyu & Huang, Jinsong & Sha, Xiqing, 2024. "Examining the effects of weather on online shopping cart abandonment: Evidence from an online retailing platform," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Morone, Andrea & Nemore, Francesco & Schirone, Dario Antonio, 2018. "Sales impact of servicescape's rational stimuli: A natural experiment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 256-262.
    5. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    6. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    8. Elena Francke, Anna & Carrete, Lorena, 2023. "Consumer self-regulation: Looking back to look forward. A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Boukis, Achilleas, 2022. "In-home service consumption: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-64.
    10. Petcharat, Thanatchaphan & Jattamart, Aungkana & Leelasantitham, Adisorn, 2023. "A conceptual model to imply a negative innovation assessment framework on consumer behaviors through the electronic business platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Khan, Asad & Rezaei, Sajad & Valaei, Naser, 2022. "Social commerce advertising avoidance and shopping cart abandonment: A fs/QCA analysis of German consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Akhtar, Naeem & Ittefaq, Huma & Siddiqi, Umar Iqbal & Islam, Tahir & Hameed, Zahid & Kuzior, Aleksandra, 2024. "Zero-COVID and retail: Using multi-wave data to examine the role of perceived risk and psychological factors in shopping abandonment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1899-1933, July.
    14. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi, 2024. "Women in top echelon positions and firm internationalisation strategies: What do we know? How do we know? Where should we be heading?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1257-1302, December.
    15. Zhao, Haichuan & Wang, Xuehua & Jiang, Lan, 2021. "To purchase or to remove? Online shopping cart warning pop-up messages can polarize liking and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 813-836.
    16. Shawana Fazal & Sobia Masood & Farrukh Nazir & Muhammad Iqbal Majoka, 2022. "Individual and Organizational Strategies for Promoting Work–Life Balance for Sustainable Workforce: A Systematic Literature Review from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    17. Xueming Luo & Xianghua Lu & Jing Li, 2019. "When and How to Leverage E-commerce Cart Targeting: The Relative and Moderated Effects of Scarcity and Price Incentives with a Two-Stage Field Experiment and Causal Forest Optimization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1203-1227, December.
    18. Andrea Caputo & Mariya Kargina, 2022. "A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 82-88, March.
    19. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    20. Nuzhat Khan & Mohamad Anuar Kamaruddin & Usman Ullah Sheikh & Yusri Yusup & Muhammad Paend Bakht, 2021. "Oil Palm and Machine Learning: Reviewing One Decade of Ideas, Innovations, Applications, and Gaps," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:400-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.