IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v12y2024i1p113-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Efficacy of Statutory Disclaimers of Mutual Funds on Novice and Seasoned Investors

Author

Listed:
  • Medha Kulkarni
  • Leena B. Dam
  • Feeroj Nasirkhan Pathan
  • Vaibhav V. Vasundekar

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to empirically examine the efficacy of statutory disclosures in the Indian mutual fund industry. Whether the disclaimers aid investors in their decision-making process was investigated. The study made a distinction between type of investors (novice and seasoned investors) as disclaimers affect differently on investor’s belief, attitude and ability to take informed decision. Survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire to evaluate the responses of 388 investors, consisting of 243 novice and 145 seasoned investors. Data was analyzed using mean comparison, independent t-test, and logistic regression model. Results revealed that statutory disclaimers were less effective on seasoned investors compared to novice investors. This suggests seasoned investors process the disclaimer information differently. Novice investors systematically process the disclaimers of mutual fund advertising, and their investment decision was meaningfully affected by the disclaimers. The study offers specific suggestions for stakeholders working in the area of behavioral finance, highlighting the importance of considering the dual process theory of information processing. To the best of authors knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to evaluate the efficacy of mandatory disclaimers in the Indian mutual fund industry, providing unique insights for future research in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Medha Kulkarni & Leena B. Dam & Feeroj Nasirkhan Pathan & Vaibhav V. Vasundekar, 2024. "Evaluating Efficacy of Statutory Disclaimers of Mutual Funds on Novice and Seasoned Investors," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(1), pages 113-132, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:113-132
    DOI: 10.1177/22785337221148558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22785337221148558
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22785337221148558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johar, Gita Venkataramani & Simmons, Carolyn J, 2000. "The Use of Concurrent Disclosures to Correct Invalid Inferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 307-322, March.
    2. Graham, Dan J. & Orquin, Jacob L. & Visschers, Vivianne H.M., 2012. "Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 378-382.
    3. Alexander Quaicoe & Paul Quaisie Eleke-Aboagye, 2021. "Behavioral factors affecting investment decision-making in bank stocks on the Ghana stock exchange," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 425-439, June.
    4. Molly Mercer & Alan R. Palmiter & Ahmed E. Taha, 2010. "Worthless Warnings? Testing the Effectiveness of Disclaimers in Mutual Fund Advertisements," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 429-459, September.
    5. Lin Peng & Wei Xiong & Tim Bollerslev, 2007. "Investor Attention and Time‐varying Comovements," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(3), pages 394-422, June.
    6. Li, Jun & Yu, Jianfeng, 2012. "Investor attention, psychological anchors, and stock return predictability," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 401-419.
    7. Alba, Joseph W & Hutchinson, J Wesley, 1987. "Dimensions of Consumer Expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 411-454, March.
    8. David Hirshleifer & Sonya S. Lim & Siew Hong Teoh, 2011. "Limited Investor Attention and Stock Market Misreactions to Accounting Information," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 35-73.
    9. KARRH, JAMES A. & McKEE, KATHY BRITTAIN & PARDUN, CAROL J., 2003. "Practitioners' Evolving Views on Product Placement Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 138-149, June.
    10. Ratneshwar, S & Chaiken, Shelly, 1991. "Comprehension's Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 52-62, June.
    11. Jonathan J. Koehler & Molly Mercer, 2009. "Selection Neglect in Mutual Fund Advertisements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1107-1121, July.
    12. Taejun (David) Lee & Tai Woong Yun & Eric Haley, 2012. "The Interplay between Advertising Disclosures and Financial Knowledge in Mutual Fund Investment Decisions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 260-287, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Hüsser & Werner Wirth, 2013. "Gravitation Toward Prior Performance in Mutual Fund Advertisings: Do Consumer Investors' Processing Abilities Account for Biased Information Processing?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 219-242, July.
    2. Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Li, Xiao & Pattnaik, Debidutta & Sharma, Anuj, 2022. "Foundations and research clusters in investor attention: Evidence from bibliometric and topic modelling analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 511-529.
    3. Beth Pontari & Andrea Stanaland & Tom Smythe, 2009. "Regulating Information Disclosure in Mutual Fund Advertising in the United States: Will Consumers Utilize Cost Information?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 333-351, December.
    4. Khaled Obaid & Kuntara Pukthuanthong, 2021. "Informativeness of mutual fund advertisements: Does advertising communicate fund quality to investors?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(1), pages 203-236, March.
    5. Cedric Mbanga & Ali F. Darrat & Jung Chul Park, 2019. "Investor sentiment and aggregate stock returns: the role of investor attention," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 397-428, August.
    6. Xie Haibin & Zhou Mo & Hu Yi & Yu Mei, 2014. "Forecasting the Crude Oil Price with Extreme Values," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(3), pages 193-205, June.
    7. Adrian Hillenbrand & André Schmelzer, 2015. "Beyond Information: Disclosure, Distracted Attention, and Investor Behavior," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2015_20, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    8. Owain Ap Gwilym & Iftekhar Hasan & Qingwei Wang & Ru Xie, 2016. "In Search of Concepts: The Effects of Speculative Demand on Stock Returns," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(3), pages 427-449, June.
    9. David Hirshleifer & Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li, 2018. "Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(7), pages 2553-2605.
    10. Bashar S. Gammoh & Kevin E. Voss & Ryan Skiver, 2011. "Consumer evaluation of continuous and discontinuous innovation," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 65-79, April.
    11. Lifang Peng & Qinyu Liao & Xiaorong Wang & Xuanfang He, 2016. "Factors affecting female user information adoption: an empirical investigation on fashion shopping guide websites," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 145-169, June.
    12. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Steinberg, Nadav & Wiener, Zvi, 2022. "The exclamation mark of Cain: Risk salience and mutual fund flows," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Dong, Ming & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2021. "Misvaluation and Corporate Inventiveness," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(8), pages 2605-2633, December.
    14. Goh, Jihoon & Jeon, Byoung-Hyun, 2017. "Post-earnings-announcement-drift and 52-week high: Evidence from Korea," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 150-159.
    15. Shin, Heejeong & Park, Sorah, 2018. "Do foreign investors mitigate anchoring bias in stock market? Evidence based on post-earnings announcement drift," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 224-240.
    16. Gang Chu & John W. Goodell & Dehua Shen & Yongjie Zhang, 2022. "Machine learning to establish proxies for investor attention: evidence of improved stock-return prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 103-128, November.
    17. Algharabat, Raed & Abdallah Alalwan, Ali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2017. "Three dimensional product presentation quality antecedents and their consequences for online retailers: The moderating role of virtual product experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-217.
    18. Ruan, Xinfeng & Zhang, Jin E., 2016. "Investor attention and market microstructure," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 125-130.
    19. Ramos, Sofia B. & Latoeiro, Pedro & Veiga, Helena, 2020. "Limited attention, salience of information and stock market activity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 92-108.
    20. Sabri Boubaker & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Hatem Rjiba, 2019. "Annual report readability and stock liquidity," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 159-186, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:113-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.