IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v11y1986i2p173-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divisionalisation and Size: A Reply to Grinyer

Author

Listed:
  • Lex Donaldson

    (The Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales.)

Abstract

Adoption of the divisional for M of organisation structure has been explained with reference to size. The present author (Donaldson 1982a) has argued against this view and asserted that strategy is a more compelling explanation theoretically and empirically. Grinyer (1982) has defended the argument from size. The present paper replies to Grinyer. It points to continuing theoretical weaknesses with size. Aspects of the defence by Grinyer are challenged. And his criticisms of the empirical research of Donaldson (1982a) are answered. Several causal models are explicated from Grinyer (1982). Fresh evidence is adduced against three out of four of them. The conclusion is that strategy is a more important cause of divisionalisation than size.

Suggested Citation

  • Lex Donaldson, 1986. "Divisionalisation and Size: A Reply to Grinyer," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 11(2), pages 173-189, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:11:y:1986:i:2:p:173-189
    DOI: 10.1177/031289628601100204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628601100204
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289628601100204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert H. Chenhall, 1979. "Some Elements of Organisational Control in Australian Divisionalised Firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 4(1_suppl), pages 1-36, June.
    2. Lex Donaldson, 1987. "Strategy And Structural Adjustment To Regain Fit And Performance: In Defence Of Contingency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Y. Suzuki, 1980. "The Strategy and structure of top 100 Japanese industrial enterprises 1950–1970," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 265-291, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    2. Ulf Schiller, 1999. "Information management and transfer pricing," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 655-673.
    3. Verver, Hugo & van Zelst, Marino & Lucas, Gerardus Johannes Maria & Meeus, Marius, 2019. "Understanding Heterogeneity in the Performance Feedback – Organizational Responsiveness Relationship: A Meta-Analysis," OSF Preprints hq4uw, Center for Open Science.
    4. Miljkovic, Dragan, 2008. "The pitfalls of transition: Crowding out the "National Virtues"," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 2107-2113, October.
    5. Rene M. Bakker, 2016. "Stepping in and stepping out: Strategic alliance partner reconfiguration and the unplanned termination of complex projects," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1919-1941, September.
    6. Dmitry Khanin & Atanu Rakshit & Raj V. Mahto & William C. McDowell, 2020. "An Ongoing race: family CEOs vs. non-family CEOs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1043-1063, September.
    7. Wang, Eric T. G., 2001. "Linking organizational context with structure: a preliminary investigation of the information processing view," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 429-443, October.
    8. Lim, Sung-Hoon, 2005. "Foreign investment impact and incentive: a strategic approach to the relationship between the objectives of foreign investment policy and their promotion," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 61-76, February.
    9. Chu Wang & Char-Lee Lok & Lian Kee Phua, 2023. "Ownership Structure and Capital Structure: Moderating Effect of Product Market Maturity," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    10. Miljkovic, Dragan, 2006. "Organizational portfolio theory and international not-for-profit organizations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 142-150, February.
    11. Liliana Pérez-Nordtvedt & G. Tyge Payne & Jeremy C. Short & Ben L. Kedia, 2008. "An Entrainment-Based Model of Temporal Organizational Fit, Misfit, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 785-801, October.
    12. Donatella Depperu & Giacomo Magnani & Lisa Crosato & Caterina Liberati, 2021. "Growth of Firms in a Fragmented Cultural Industry: Italian Commercial Art Galleries’ Competitive Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Iben Duvald, 2019. "Exploring reasons for the weekend effect in a hospital emergency department: an information processing perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Diego Armando Marín-Idárraga & Juan Carlos Cuartas-Marín, 2014. "Teorías del análisis y diseno organizacional: una revisión a los postulados contingentes y de la co-alineación estratégica," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 153-168, June.
    15. Stéphane J. G. Girod & Richard Whittington, 2017. "Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1121-1133, May.
    16. Andreini, Daniela & Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Zarantonello, Lia & Solerio, Chiara, 2019. "Reprint of "A renaissance of brand experience: Advancing the concept through a multi-perspective analysis"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 355-365.
    17. Li, Sali & Tallman, Stephen B. & Ferreira, Manuel P., 2005. "Developing the eclectic paradigm as a model of global strategy: An application to the impact of the Sep. 11 terrorist attacks on MNE performance levels," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 479-496, December.
    18. Nikos Vafeas & Adamos Vlittis, 2012. "An agency-based perspective on the performance consequences of COO adoption," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 361-382, October.
    19. Sophie Fenner & Torbjørn Netland, 2023. "Lean service: a contingency perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1271-1289, September.
    20. Kaushik Roy, 2010. "Integrating Resource-Based and Rational Contingency Views: Understanding Design of Dynamic Capabilities of Organisations," Working Papers id:2699, eSocialSciences.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:11:y:1986:i:2:p:173-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.