IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v65y2017i9p17-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of The European Union S Science And Technology Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin ANGHELACHE

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies / „Artifex” University of Bucharest)

  • Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL

    („Artifex” University of Bucharest)

  • Andreea–Ioana MARINESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Maria MIREA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

In this article, the authors have explored how the European Union and the Member States are working towards the development of science, technology and innovation, in order to improve the quality of economic activity. In this context, the provisions of the European Union Strategy until 2020, launched in October 2010, are analyzed. The focus is on presenting the data on the spending of the European Union and each Member State in the field of research and development. To be relevant, these data are also compared with the indicators in this area of other high-standard economies such as the U.S., Japan and China. As a result, the largest share of R & D spending in the Gross Domestic Product is recorded by Japan, around 4.0-4.2% in the period 2013-2016. In all EU Member States, spending on research and development increased year-on-year from 2004 to 2014, as shown by graphical representation. Data was provided on the staff involved in this activity in the European Union as well as in each Member State.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin ANGHELACHE & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Andreea–Ioana MARINESCU & Maria MIREA, 2017. "Analysis Of The European Union S Science And Technology Strategy," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(9), pages 17-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:9:p:17-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/A1en_rrss_09_2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akçomak, I. Semih & ter Weel, Bas, 2009. "Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 544-567, July.
    2. Peter Voigt & Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2012. "Can Fast Growing R&D-Intensive Smes Affect the Economic Structure of the Eu Economy?: A Projection to the Year 2020," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(2), pages 96-128, December.
    3. Hugo Pinto, 2009. "The Diversity of Innovation in the European Union: Mapping Latent Dimensions and Regional Profiles," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 303-326, February.
    4. Thomas Farole & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Michael Storper, 2011. "Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 1089-1111, September.
    5. Michele Cincera & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2013. "Young leading innovators and the EU's R&D intensity gap," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 177-198, March.
    6. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, Pietro & Ciupagea, Constantin & Smith, Keith & Tübke, Alexander & Tubbs, Mike, 2010. "Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 523-536, May.
    7. Martin Srholec, 2009. "Does foreign ownership facilitate cooperation on innovation? Firm-level evidence from the enlarged European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 21(1), pages 47-62, February.
    8. Bravo-Ortega, Claudio & García Marín, Álvaro, 2011. "R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1090-1107, July.
    9. Block, Joern H., 2012. "R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 248-265.
    10. Constantin Anghelache & Olivia Georgiana Nita & Alexandru Badiu, 2016. "Migrants remittances – an important and stable source of external funds, in the economic development of a country," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(12), pages 86-92, December.
    11. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Alexandru MANOLE & Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL & Marius POPOVICI, 2016. "Human resources: their role and development in the national economy," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(4), pages 59-65, April.
    12. Buesa, Mikel & Heijs, Joost & Baumert, Thomas, 2010. "The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 722-735, July.
    13. Alberto Onetti & Antonella Zucchella & Marian Jones & Patricia McDougall-Covin, 2012. "Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 337-368, August.
    14. Barbosa, Natália & Faria, Ana Paula, 2011. "Innovation across Europe: How important are institutional differences?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1157-1169.
    15. Bernhard Dachs & Andreas Pyka, 2010. "What drives the internationalisation of innovation? Evidence from European patent data," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 71-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Stefan Virgil IACOB & Dana Luiza GRIGORESCU, 2022. "Economic growth at the expense of technology," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(632), A), pages 207-222, Autumn.
    2. Madalina-Gabriela Anghel & Constantin Anghelache & Daniel Dumitrescu & Doina Burea & Radu Stoica, 2018. "Analysis of the Effect of Accessing the Community Funds for Financing Investments on Romania's Economic Growth," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 102-112, April.
    3. Gabriela Victoria ANGHELACHE & Ștefan Daniel ARMEANU & Constantin ANGHELACHE, 2020. "The European Union in the face of the prospect of achieving major objectives in the conditions of the pandemic and economic-financial crisis," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(625), W), pages 5-20, Winter.
    4. Hauser, Christoph & Siller, Matthias & Schatzer, Thomas & Walde, Janette & Tappeiner, Gottfried, 2018. "Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 43-55.
    5. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Ștefan Virgil IACOB & Ana Maria POPESCU, 2021. "Is the creation of major objectives in the European Union an objective that may constitute a challenge for the Member States of the European Union?," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(626), S), pages 101-116, Spring.
    6. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Nicola Grassano, 2022. "The EU vs US corporate R&D intensity gap: investigating key sectors and firms [A primer on innovation and growth]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 19-38.
    7. Ganau, Roberto & Grandinetti, Roberto, 2021. "Disentangling regional innovation capability: what really matters?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114921, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. d'Agostino, Giorgio & Scarlato, Margherita, 2012. "Inclusive Institutions, Innovation and Economic Growth: Estimates for European Countries," MPRA Paper 43098, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Otilia Manta & Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja, 2021. "Finances and National Economy: Frugal Economy as a Forced Approach of the COVID Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Perugini, Francesco, 2022. "Regional innovation disparities in Italy: The role of governance," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    11. Matthias Siller & Christoph Hauser & Janette Walde & Gottfried Tappeiner, 2015. "Measuring regional innovation in one dimension: More lost than gained?," Working Papers 2015-14, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    12. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Maria MIREA, 2017. "Accumulated National Wealth – An Element Of Economic Development," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(10), pages 14-24, October.
    13. Feng, Ping & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "Self-selection and performance of R&D input of heterogeneous firms: Evidence from China's manufacturing industries," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 181-195.
    14. d'Agostino, Giorgio & Scarlato, Margherita, 2016. "Institutions, Innovation and Economic Growth in European Countries," MPRA Paper 72427, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Cucculelli, Marco & Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle & Miller, Danny, 2016. "Product innovation, firm renewal and family governance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 90-104.
    16. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Andreea - Ioana MARINESCU, 2017. "The Main Structural Indicators Of The National Wealth," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(10), pages 58-66, October.
    17. Bischoff, Thore Sören & Hipp, Ann & Runst, Petrik, 2023. "Firm innovation and generalized trust as a regional resource," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    18. Sá, Elisabete S. & Pinho, José Carlos M.R. de, 2019. "Effect of entrepreneurial framework conditions on R&D transfer to new and growing firms: The case of European Union innovation-driven countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 47-58.
    19. Patricio Duran & Nadine Kammerlander & Marc van Essen & Thomas Zellweger, 2016. "Doing More with Less : Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms," Post-Print hal-02276703, HAL.
    20. Coad, Alex, 2019. "Persistent heterogeneity of R&D intensities within sectors: Evidence and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research; innovation; science; strategy; innovative union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:9:p:17-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.