IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v65y2017i4p168-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis Of The Offer Of University Education System

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin ANGHELACHE

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies/„Artifex" University of Bucharest)

  • Emilia GOGU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL

    („Artifex" University of Bucharest)

Abstract

In this article, the authors have proposed to consider a period of time based on existing data system statistics, quantitative and qualitative development of the activity in the university education system in Romania. The premise was left in such a study is that, every year, producing fewer high school graduates with a baccalaureate diploma. On the other hand, all in a certain decline is recorded growth rates drop by more and more university students. Another important element in the analysis of the university is the fact that the labor market offers fewer opportunities for employment on the profile of each program graduates of bachelor and master. The analysis is based on the fact that in Romania there are a number of institutions of higher education or 55 higher education in the state and 46 private higher education institutions (37 universities and 9 foundations). Analysis was done on several criteria, namely: the number of candidates enrolled in universities accredited or provisionally approved expressing a decline from year to year. Secondly, it has pursued an analysis on key fundamental areas of undergraduate level recorded in 2016/2017 academic year or other years of prior periods. Another element of the analysis, it was the structure of graduates license key areas during the 2014/2015, 2016/2017, which showed some progress. Number of seats in the first year offered by government policies began to be increasingly more fragile occupied by candidates who wish to undertake undergraduate studies, and then the master. The authors focused on the present hierarchy state and private higher education institutions by offering seats for the first year and considered the situation according to Government Decision No 654/2016, which is consistent with the structure for the academic year 2016- 2017. An interesting element option presents candidates t o fill seats specializations year at public institutions and private institutions. Of course, there is a certain hierarchy, leaving the seats Free State (budget) and total paid-seats offered so higher education institutions and the private. We used a hierarchy of main specializations based on the number of seats offered for the first year in public and private institutions for the academic year 2016-2017 to show the specific situation of the offer of seats in higher education and employment demand in these seats with entrance exams to reveal the situation in our country. To highlight more clearly what the situation is in connection to bid for seats in 2016-2017, the authors resorted to presenting EU Member hierarchy after share of population with tertiary education in total employment for the age of 15-64 years. The data we used refers to 2015 for which data were comparable for all European Union countries. An important element of it was the fact that the structure of education in Romania is slightly narrower than in other Eastern European countries. From this point of view in Romania there are only two possibilities, namely that of high school or a school of arts and crafts for secondary school graduates and for high school graduates only university or post-secondary. Germany, as an example, offers a much larger number, in both cases, reaching that offer high school graduates are nine such tracks. Then, we referred to the fact that in Romania there is a high school dropout, and to this end, we conducted a study during 2010-2015 on the degree and level of inclusion in education of the population aged 15-18 years. In Romania, enrollment rate decreased year by year, both in structure and in absolute numbers. It is clear that a significant number of people aged 15-18 left out of education. Embodying the available data were made presentations about the school population aged 17 years, from birth, who were students enrolled in education in 2014-2015 and evolution of the number of students promoted or failed the baccalaureate during 2010-2016. In the study, the authors sought to identify the causes that led to these results, much lower in terms of high school graduates who were able to obtain high school diploma. Based on the results presented, the authors attempted an expression of the number of students from the offer for high school graduates with BAC between 2017-2022. Not least was considered the correlation with the labor market and settled share level and age group of 0-24 years in the total population in 1992, 2010 and 2016. At the end of this study, the authors allow some suggestions on the basis of the causes identified in the social responsibility of universities in rural areas, which can lead to a better access to general education and university in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin ANGHELACHE & Emilia GOGU & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL, 2017. "The Analysis Of The Offer Of University Education System," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(4), pages 168-197, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:168-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/rrss_04_2017_site_A08_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven G. Rivkin & Eric A. Hanushek & John F. Kain, 2005. "Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 417-458, March.
    2. Pedro Carneiro & Costas Meghir & Matthias Parey, 2013. "Maternal Education, Home Environments, And The Development Of Children And Adolescents," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11, pages 123-160, January.
    3. Papay, John P. & Kraft, Matthew A., 2015. "Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 105-119.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1mhdgtufmp9u2blp3nkko6i6f3 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Teaching Practices and Social Capital," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 189-210, July.
    6. Paola Giuliano, 2007. "Living Arrangements in Western Europe: Does Cultural Origin Matter?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 5(5), pages 927-952, September.
    7. Florian Hoffmann & Philip Oreopoulos, 2009. "Professor Qualities and Student Achievement," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(1), pages 83-92, February.
    8. Jesse Rothstein, 2015. "Teacher Quality Policy When Supply Matters," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 100-130, January.
    9. Lorraine Dearden & Emla Fitzsimons & Alissa Goodman & Greg Kaplan, 2008. "Higher Education Funding Reforms in England: The Distributional Effects and the Shifting Balance of Costs," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(526), pages 100-125, February.
    10. Alexander Cappelen & John List & Anya Samek & Bertil Tungodden, 2016. "The Effect of Early Education on Social Preferences," Framed Field Experiments 00584, The Field Experiments Website.
    11. Cunha, Flavio & Heckman, James J. & Lochner, Lance, 2006. "Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation," Handbook of the Economics of Education, in: Erik Hanushek & F. Welch (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 12, pages 697-812, Elsevier.
    12. C. Kirabo Jackson & Jonah E. Rockoff & Douglas O. Staiger, 2014. "Teacher Effects and Teacher-Related Policies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 801-825, August.
    13. Brian A. Jacob & Lars Lefgren, 2008. "Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 101-136.
    14. Clive R Belfield & Milagros Nores & Steve Barnett & Lawrence Schweinhart, 2006. "The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost–Benefit Analysis Using Data from the Age-40 Followup," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 41(1).
    15. Eric P. Bettinger & Bridget Terry Long, 2010. "Does Cheaper Mean Better? The Impact of Using Adjunct Instructors on Student Outcomes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(3), pages 598-613, August.
    16. Greg J. Duncan & Katherine Magnuson, 2013. "Investing in Preschool Programs," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 109-132, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Gabriela Victoria ANGHELACHE & Mădălina Gabriela ANGHEL, 2019. "The education and training. Priorities of the European Union," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(619), S), pages 5-20, Summer.
    2. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina Gabriela ANGHEL, 2018. "Analysis of the educational activity in Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(616), A), pages 77-90, Autumn.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Gabriela Victoria ANGHELACHE & Mădălina Gabriela ANGHEL, 2019. "The education and training. Priorities of the European Union," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(619), S), pages 5-20, Summer.
    2. Matthew A. Kraft & John P. Papay & Olivia L. Chi, 2020. "Teacher Skill Development: Evidence from Performance Ratings by Principals," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 315-347, March.
    3. M. Caridad Araujo & Pedro Carneiro & Yyannú Cruz-Aguayo & Norbert Schady, 2016. "Teacher Quality and Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(3), pages 1415-1453.
    4. Tian, Zhilei & Wei, Yi & Li, Fang, 2019. "Who are better teachers? The effects of tenure-track and part-time faculty on student achievement," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 140-151.
    5. Dhushyanth Raju, 2017. "Public School Teacher Management in Sri Lanka," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 18(1), pages 39-63, March.
    6. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina Gabriela ANGHEL, 2018. "Analysis of the educational activity in Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(616), A), pages 77-90, Autumn.
    7. Michael Bates & Michael Dinerstein & Andrew C. Johnston & Isaac Sorkin, 2022. "Teacher Labor Market Equilibrium and Student Achievement," CESifo Working Paper Series 9551, CESifo.
    8. Murphy, Richard & Weinhardt, Felix & Wyness, Gill, 2021. "Who teaches the teachers? A RCT of peer-to-peer observation and feedback in 181 schools," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Brodaty, Thibault & Gurgand, Marc, 2016. "Good peers or good teachers? Evidence from a French University," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 62-78.
    10. Akabayashi, Hideo & Ruberg, Tim & Shikishima, Chizuru & Yamashita, Jun, 2023. "Education-oriented and care-oriented preschools: Implications on child development," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Johnston, Andrew C., 2021. "Preferences, Selection, and the Structure of Teacher Pay," IZA Discussion Papers 14831, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Liebowitz, David D., 2021. "Teacher evaluation for accountability and growth: Should policy treat them as complements or substitutes?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Nirav Mehta, 2022. "A Partial Identification Approach to Identifying the Determinants of Human Capital Accumulation: An Application to Teachers," CESifo Working Paper Series 9681, CESifo.
    14. Michael Dinerstein & Rigissa Megalokonomou & Constantine Yannelis, 2020. "Human Capital Depreciation," Working Papers 2020-146, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    15. Kirabo Jackson & Alexey Makarin, 2018. "Can Online Off-the-Shelf Lessons Improve Student Outcomes? Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 226-254, August.
    16. Maarten Goos & Anna Salomons, 2017. "Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(4), pages 341-364, June.
    17. Braga, Michela & Paccagnella, Marco & Pellizzari, Michele, 2014. "Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 71-88.
    18. Gershenson, Seth, 2021. "Identifying and Producing Effective Teachers," IZA Discussion Papers 14096, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Koedel, Cory & Mihaly, Kata & Rockoff, Jonah E., 2015. "Value-added modeling: A review," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 180-195.
    20. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky, 2011. "Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 641-653, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    university; offer; student; study program; specialization; license studies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:168-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.