IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v17y2022i3p30-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing The Spatial Distribution Of Private Universities Using The Gravity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Abu GHARBIEH

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, German Jordanian University, Department of Architecture and Interior Architecture, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan)

  • Raed AL TAL

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, German Jordanian University, Department of Architecture and Interior Architecture, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan)

  • Imad HASHIMI

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, German Jordanian University, Department of Architecture and Interior Architecture, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan)

Abstract

This study assesses the spatial distribution of private universities using a Spatial Interaction Model (SIM) called Gravity Model (GM). It attempts to develop and validate a model that explains the prospective students’ attractions and priorities to enroll in private universities in Jordan as a case study. Research methodology is a mixed methods embedded design that includes qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. It involves a survey for 608 students. Data collected from the survey are used in a proposed Production-Constrained Gravity Model. The results revealed that students’ sensitivity to the distance (location) variable is considerably high. Similar method can be used as a tool to find out the best location for a proposed university in other countries worldwide. The importance of this research lies in the absence of the scientific methodological spatial studies related to the selection of universities locations. It also proposes a gravity model formula that can be used in evaluating the suitability of a certain site for the location of a new private university in Amman, Jordan. The same methodology can be used worldwide in the field of urban management.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Abu GHARBIEH & Raed AL TAL & Imad HASHIMI, 2022. "Analyzing The Spatial Distribution Of Private Universities Using The Gravity Model," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(3), pages 30-53, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:30-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://um.ase.ro/no173/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carla Sa & Raymond Florax & Piet Rietveld, 2004. "Determinants of the Regional Demand for Higher Education in The Netherlands: A Gravity Model Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 375-392.
    2. Ahmad MUKSIN & Bhakti Nur AVIANTO, 2021. "Governance Innovation: One-Stop Integrated Service To Enhance Quality Service And Public Satisfaction," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 40-60, February.
    3. John Cullinan & Jim Duggan, 2016. "A School-Level Gravity Model of Student Migration Flows to Higher Education Institutions," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 294-314, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diogo Lourenço & Carla Sá, 2019. "Spatial competition for students: What does (not) matter?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 147-162, August.
    2. Carla Sá & Raymond Florax & Piet Rietveld, 2007. "Living-arrangement and university decisions of Dutch young adults," NIPE Working Papers 14/2007, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    3. Bruckmeier Kerstin & Fischer Georg-Benedikt & Wigger Berthold U., 2015. "Studiengebühren in Deutschland: Lehren aus einem gescheiterten Experiment," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 289-301, October.
    4. Delaney, Judith M. & Devereux, Paul J., 2020. "Choosing differently? College application behavior and the persistence of educational advantage," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Reinhard A. Weisser, 2020. "How Personality Shapes Study Location Choices," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(1), pages 88-116, February.
    6. Peter Berck & Sofia Tano & Olle Westerlund, 2016. "Regional Sorting of Human Capital: The Choice of Location among Young Adults in Sweden," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 757-770, May.
    7. Beine, Michel & Noël, Romain & Ragot, Lionel, 2014. "Determinants of the international mobility of students," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 40-54.
    8. Philipp Gareis & Tom Broekel, 2022. "The Spatial Patterns of Student Mobility Before, During and After the Bologna Process in Germany," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(3), pages 290-309, July.
    9. Mabel Sanchez-Barrioluengo & Sara Flisi, 2017. "Student Mobility in Tertiary Education: institutional factors and regional attractiveness," JRC Research Reports JRC108895, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Andy Dickerson & Steven McIntosh, 2013. "The Impact of Distance to Nearest Education Institution on the Post-compulsory Education Participation Decision," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 742-758, March.
    11. Abugamea, Gaber, 2019. "Determinants of demand for higher education in palestine, the case of gaza strip 1994-2017," MPRA Paper 96257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Diogo Lourenço & Carla Sá & Orlanda Tavares, 2017. "Pushed Away From Home? Spatial Mobility Of Prospective Higher Education Students And The Enrolment Decision," FEP Working Papers 593, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    13. Javier García-Estévez & Néstor Duch-Brown, 2012. "Student graduation: to what extent does university expenditure matter?," Working Papers 2012/4, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    14. Ludo Peeters, 2006. "Job Opportunities, Amenities, and Variable Distance-Deterrence Elasticities: An Empirical Model of Inter-Municipal Migration in Belgium," ERSA conference papers ersa06p585, European Regional Science Association.
    15. S. Bacci & B. Bertaccini, 2021. "Assessment of the University Reputation Through the Analysis of the Student Mobility," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 363-388, August.
    16. Evert Meijers, 2005. "High-level consumer services in polycentric urban regions - hospital care and higher education between duplication and complementarity," ERSA conference papers ersa05p208, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Malik Fahim Bashir & Changsheng Xu & Khalid Zaman & Ghulam Akhmat, 2014. "Key Factors Determining the Rationale for Brain Drain: An Irony Never Recovered," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 2(8), pages 308-320, August.
    18. Nicola Francesco Dotti & Ugo Fratesi & Camilla Lenzi & Marco Percoco, 2014. "Local labour market conditions and the spatial mobility of science and technology university students: evidence from Italy," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 34(2), pages 119-137, October.
    19. Kłosowski Franciszek, 2019. "Service connections of the Katowice conurbation cities," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(4), pages 17-25, December.
    20. Arthur Grimes & Shaan Badenhorst & David C. Maré & Jacques Poot, 2020. "Hometown wh?nau or big city millennials? The economic geography of graduate destination choices in New Zealand," Working Papers 20_04, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:30-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.