IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v14y2019i2p20-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Service Delivery: Public Perception Of Municipal Service Delivery In South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tyanai MASIYA

    (School of Public Management and Administration, University of Pretoria, South Africa)

  • Yul D. DAVIDS

    (Democracy, Governance and Service Delivery Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa)

  • Mary S. MANGAI

    (School of Public Management and Administration, University of Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

Existing research reveals that there has been increasing community impatience related to basic municipal service delivery in developing countries, for example, South Africa. Many scholars have argued that the rise in service delivery protests in South Africa can be attributed to organisational failure to provide satisfactory basic services because many communities remain un-serviced. This article investigates citizen satisfaction with basic municipal service delivery in South Africa and analyses citizen perceptions thereof based on the South African Social Attitude Survey. The study is quantitative in nature. The findings reveal that citizen dissatisfaction with service delivery is influenced by factors such as perceptions of relative deprivation and inequality, unfulfilled political promises, uneven access to services, provision of substandard services and high levels of poverty including disparities which emanate from the post-apartheid regime. The article is relevant at this point because many African municipalities are facing similar service delivery challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyanai MASIYA & Yul D. DAVIDS & Mary S. MANGAI, 2019. "Assessing Service Delivery: Public Perception Of Municipal Service Delivery In South Africa," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 20-40, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:20-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no142/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarina Roos & Anders Lidström, 2014. "Local policies and local government legitimacy. The Swedish case," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 137-152, July.
    2. Oludele A. Akinboade & Mandisa Putuma Mokwena & Emilie C. Kinfack, 2013. "Understanding citizens' participation in service delivery protests in South Africa's Sedibeng district municipality," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 458-478, April.
    3. Gregg G. Van Ryzin, 2004. "Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 433-448.
    4. Sultan O. Almarshad, 2015. "Municipal Awareness and Citizen Satisfaction: The Case of Northern Borders in Saudi Arabia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 5(2), pages 94-101.
    5. Oludele A. Akinboade & Mandisa Putuma Mokwena & Emilie C. Kinfack, 2013. "Understanding citizens' participation in service delivery protests in South Africa's Sedibeng district municipality," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 40(5), pages 458-478, May.
    6. Anuradha Joshi & Mick Moore, 2004. "Institutionalised Co-production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 31-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Mamokhere, 2023. "Sending a message to the top: the influence of service delivery protests on service delivery planning in South African municipalities," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(2), pages 60-71, June.
    2. Md. Al-Fahad BHUIYAN & Md. Ashraful ISLAM, 2023. "Assessment Of Service Quality Of Urban Local Government In Bangladesh: The Case Of Pabna Municipality," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(1), pages 85-105, February.
    3. Snyman, Lourens & Coetzee, Serena, 2024. "Measuring geographic accessibility in data poor rural areas by augmenting the road network with a triangular irregular network – A case study in the O.R. Tambo District Municipality of the Eastern Cap," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Douglas Barrios & Federico Sturzenegger & Frank Muci & Patricio Goldstein & Ricardo Hausmann, 2022. "Macroeconomic risks after a decade of microeconomic turbulence: South Africa 2007-2020," CID Working Papers 404, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    5. Chipo Mutyambizi & Tholang Mokhele & Catherine Ndinda & Charles Hongoro, 2020. "Access to and Satisfaction with Basic Services in Informal Settlements: Results from a Baseline Assessment Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    2. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    3. Luisa Moretto, 2007. "Urban governance and multilateral aid organizations: The case of informal water supply systems," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 345-370, December.
    4. Xinghua Zhao & Zongfeng Sun, 2020. "The Effect of Satisfaction with Environmental Performance on Subjective Well-Being in China: GDP as a Moderating Factor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Amengual, Matthew, 2010. "Complementary Labor Regulation: The Uncoordinated Combination of State and Private Regulators in the Dominican Republic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 405-414, March.
    7. Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov & Andersen, Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard & Jensen, Ulrich Thy & Waldorff, Frans Boch & Jacobsen, Christian Bøtcher, 2018. "Can external interventions crowd in intrinsic motivation? A cluster randomised field experiment on mandatory accreditation of general practice in Denmark," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 224-233.
    8. Federica Natalia Rosati & Luisa Moretto & Jacques Teller, 2020. "An incremental approach to service co-production: unfolding the co-evolution of the built environment and water and sanitation infrastructures," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/314020, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov & Allen, Thomas & Waldorff, Frans Boch & Andersen, Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard, 2020. "Does accreditation affect the job satisfaction of general practitioners? A combined panel data survey and cluster randomised field experiment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 849-855.
    10. Peters, David H. & Muraleedharan, V.R., 2008. "Regulating India's health services: To what end? What future?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2133-2144, May.
    11. Akaateba, Millicent Awialie & Huang, Huang & Adumpo, Emile Akangoa, 2018. "Between co-production and institutional hybridity in land delivery: Insights from local planning practice in peri-urban Tamale, Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 215-226.
    12. Gorgulu,Nisan & Sharafutdinova,Gulnaz & Steinbuks,Jevgenijs, 2020. "Political Dividends of Digital Participatory Governance : Evidence from Moscow Pothole Management," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9445, The World Bank.
    13. Audrey Sacks, 2012. "Can Donors and Nonstate Actors Undermine Citizens' Legitimating Beliefs?," World Bank Publications - Reports 16955, The World Bank Group.
    14. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    15. Catherine Crawford & Sarah Bell, 2012. "Analysing the Relationship between Urban Livelihoods and Water Infrastructure in Three Settlements in Cusco, Peru," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1045-1064, April.
    16. James Gerard Caillier, 2020. "Bureaucratic Bashing and Praising: What Effect Does it Have on the Performance Citizens Assign Agencies?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 685-701, December.
    17. Zongfeng Sun & Jintao Li, 2019. "Citizens’ Satisfaction with Air Quality and Key Factors in China—Using the Anchoring Vignettes Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Zongfeng Sun & Jintao Li, 2020. "The Effects of Performance of Public Sector Health System on Quality of Life in China: Evidence from the CGSS2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Muhammad Umar Bello & David Martin @ Daud Juanil & Rozilah Kasim, 2017. "Municipal Awareness as an Integral Part for Enhancing Citizen Satisfaction of Malaysian Municipal Councils, Batu Pahat," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 3(7(24)), pages 2.1-2.10, July.
    20. Indranil De & Rooba Hasan & Mubashshir Iqbal, 2022. "Natural Treatment Systems and Importance of Social Cost Benefit Analysis in Developing Countries: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:20-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.