IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v11y2016i1p5-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quality Of The Urban Transport In Bucharest And How To Improve It In Accordance With The Expectations Of The Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Armenia ANDRONICEANU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana 6, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

public transportation is an essential public service for the citizens of the urban environment. Most city halls from all over the world were able to manage this urban service effectively. Unfortunately, there are several cities in Europe and not only where the urban public transport needs consistent investments in order to increase the quality and to become more attractive for the citizens. Bucharest, the capital of Romania, is among the cities with several problems in urban transport and this is the main reason for approaching the subject. The aim of this research was to find out the main solutions for increasing the quality of the local public transport in Bucharest based on the positive and negative aspects discovered and the main expectations of the Bucharest`s citizens, as they were formulated during the survey. In order to do that, a representative sample for Bucharest containing 384 respondents was set-up.For data collection was used a questioner and a simplified SWOT analysis related to the local transport in Bucharest was developed. The final part of the work contains some recommendations for improving the quality of the public transport in Bucharest according to the citizens requirements and the Bucharest City Hall`s strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2016. "The Quality Of The Urban Transport In Bucharest And How To Improve It In Accordance With The Expectations Of The Citizens," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 5-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:5-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no111/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. dell'Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Angel & Cecin, Patricia, 2011. "The quality of service desired by public transport users," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 217-227, January.
    2. Nilanchal PATEL & Alok Bhushan MUKHERJEE, 2014. "Categorization Of Urban Traffic Congestion Based On The Fuzzification Of Congestion Index Value And Influencing Parameters," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(4), pages 36-51, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel FAGGIANELLI & Sorin BURLACU & Cécile CARRA, 2018. "Victimization Of Health Professionals In Bucharest Service Relations And Social Work Relationships," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 109-126, June.
    2. Žiga KOTNIK & Maja KLUN & Damjan ŠKULJ, 2017. "Performance Budgeting Model In The Environmental Perspective: Tackling Waste Pollution," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(29), pages 141-150, December.
    3. Miroslaw Smieszek & Magdalena Dobrzanska & Pawel Dobrzanski, 2019. "Rzeszow as a City Taking Steps Towards Developing Sustainable Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Vlad I. RO?CA, 2018. "Too Young To Drive? The Impact Of Age And Generational Cohorts On Motorization In Europe," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 53-64, May.
    5. Armenia ANDRONICEANU, 2017. "Hospital Management Based on the Relationship between Doctors and Patients," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(29), pages 41-53, December.
    6. Edyta Bielińska-Dusza & Monika Hamerska & Agnieszka Żak, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility and the Smart City: A Vision of the City of the Future: The Case Study of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Beata Gavurova & Martin Rigelsky & Martin Mikeska, 2023. "Relationships between road transport indicators and expenditure of visitors in the context of European countries’ tourism competitiveness," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 393-418, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs & Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj, 2014. "Model of users׳ expectations of drivers of sightseeing buses: confirmatory factor analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 253-262.
    2. Alessandro Vitale & Giuseppe Guido & Daniele Rogano, 2016. "A smartphone based DSS platform for assessing transit service attributes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 315-340, September.
    3. Hamid Mahmood Gelaidan & Abdullah Al-Swidi & Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, 2023. "Studying the Joint Effects of Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Benefits, and Environmental Concerns in Sustainable Travel Behavior: Extending the TPB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Chica-Olmo, Jorge & Gachs-Sánchez, Héctor & Lizarraga, Carmen, 2018. "Route effect on the perception of public transport services quality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 40-48.
    5. Jean-Michel Clairand & Paulo Guerra-Terán & Xavier Serrano-Guerrero & Mario González-Rodríguez & Guillermo Escrivá-Escrivá, 2019. "Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Hickman, Robin & Chen, Chia-Lin & Chow, Andy & Saxena, Sharad, 2015. "Improving interchanges in China: the experiential phenomenon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 175-186.
    7. Chandra Mahapatra, Subas & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar, 2023. "Higher expectations of passengers do really sense: Development and validation a multiple scale-FliQual for air transport service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Yue Liu & Jun Chen & Weiguang Wu & Jiao Ye, 2019. "Typical Combined Travel Mode Choice Utility Model in Multimodal Transportation Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Eric N. AIDOO & William AGYEMANG & Jane E. MONKAH & Francis K. AFUKAAR, 2013. "pASSENGER’S SATISFACTION WITH PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT SERVICES IN GHANA: A CASE STUDY OF KUMASI–ACCRA ROUTE," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 33-44, May.
    10. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de & Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos, 2021. "Car users’ attitudes towards an enhanced bus system to mitigate urban congestion in a developing country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 452-464.
    11. Link, Heike, 2019. "The impact of including service quality into efficiency analysis: The case of franchising regional rail passenger serves in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 284-300.
    12. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-57.
    13. Epstein, Bryan & Givoni, Moshe, 2016. "Analyzing the gap between the QOS demanded by PT users and QOS supplied by service operators," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 622-637.
    14. Khan, Shakil & Maoh, Hanna, 2022. "Investigating attitudes towards fleet electrification – An exploratory analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 188-205.
    15. Mulley, Corinne & Ho, Chinh & Ho, Loan & Hensher, David & Rose, John, 2018. "Will bus travellers walk further for a more frequent service? An international study using a stated preference approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 88-97.
    16. Clark, Derek J. & Mathisen, Terje Andreas, 2020. "Salience in a simple transport market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Ram, Yael & Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Rechavi, Amit, 2021. "Identifying attributes of public transport services for urban tourists: A data-mining method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Celik, Erkan & Aydin, Nezir & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2014. "A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 283-293.
    19. Gamal Eldeeb & Moataz Mohamed, 2020. "Understanding the Transit Market: A Persona-Based Approach for Preferences Quantification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Zhang, Kai & Zhou, Kan & Zhang, Fangzhou, 2014. "Evaluating bus transit performance of Chinese cities: Developing an overall bus comfort model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 105-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:5-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.