IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2020y2020i34p118-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Serhiy SHKARLET

    (Chernihiv National University of Technology, Ukraine)

  • Igor OLIYCHENKO

    (Chernihiv National University of Technology, Ukraine)

  • Maksym DUBYNA

    (Chernihiv National University of Technology, Ukraine)

  • Maryna DITKOVSKA

    (Chernihiv National University of Technology, Ukraine)

  • Vladimir ZHOVTOK

    (Chernihiv National University of Technology, Ukraine)

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the practice of implementing e-government in different countries gives an opportunity to identify the advantages and disadvantages of existing information systems, find ways to optimize and improve the efficiency of public administration. The purpose of this study was to identify the leading countries in e-Government development for comparison with Ukraine, and to apply their positive experience in implementing e-portals, creating the necessary regulatory framework, disseminating the Internet, and attracting citizens to participate in the processes of forming the information society. The article explores the dynamics of E-Government Development Index (EGDI) and E-Participation Index (EPI), analyzes the achievements of developed countries in e-government, and identifies leading countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Spain whose experience is useful for its application in Ukraine. The qualitative analysis of the achievements of different countries was based on the UN e-Government knowledgebase and the United Nations E-Government Survey from 2003 to 2018, information from e-Governance research articles, government website data, newsletters, and research findings. The study of e-government practice in leading countries and in Ukraine shows that the development of public information space has many similarities and the process of e-government formation in developing countries in many spheres follows the path of developed countries, preserving their own national features. The authors of the article have identified the main common components of this process, outlined aspects of improving the practice of e-government in the direction of building an effective system of public administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhiy SHKARLET & Igor OLIYCHENKO & Maksym DUBYNA & Maryna DITKOVSKA & Vladimir ZHOVTOK, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 118-136, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2020:y:2020:i:34:p:118-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2020/34-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daiva Tamulevičienė & Armenia Androniceanu & Armenia Androniceanu, 2020. "Selection of the indicators to measure an enterprise’s value and its changes in the controlling system for medium-sized enterprises," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1440-1458, March.
    2. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Sebastian Kot & Armenia Androniceanu & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Sangki, Jin, 2018. "Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: Based on Korea's e-government practices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 860-871.
    4. Choi, Hyeri & Park, Min Jae & Rho, Jae Jeung & Zo, Hangjung, 2016. "Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 644-660.
    5. David BECERRA ALONSO & Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Irina GEORGESCU, 2016. "Sensitivity and vulnerability of European countries in time of crisis based on a new approach to data clustering and curvilinear analysis," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2016(27), pages 46-61, Decembre.
    6. Oana Vasile & Armenia Androniceanu, 2018. "An Overview of the Romanian Asylum Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ovidiu Andrei Cristian BUZOIANU & Mihaela Diana NEGESCU OANCEA & Petrut Cristian VASILACHE & Florentina COMANESCU, 2021. "Implementation Of E-Government In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 974-979, November.
    2. Androniceanu Armenia & Georgescu Irina, 2021. "E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 65-86, December.
    3. Leogrande, Angelo & Magaletti, Nicola & Cosoli, Gabriele & Massaro, Alessandro, 2022. "e-Government in Europe. A Machine Learning Approach," MPRA Paper 112242, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dalal Bamufleh & Amani Saud Alshamari & Asrar Saud Alsobhi & Hanan Hisham Ezzi & Waad Sultan Alruhaili, 2021. "Exploring Public Attitudes toward E-Government Health Applications Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1, August.
    5. Ane-Mari Androniceanu & Irina Georgescu & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Armenia Androniceanu, 2020. "Canonical Correlation Analysis and a New Composite Index on Digitalization and Labor Force in the Context of the Industrial Revolution 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agus SUBIANTO & H. MASHOED & Hari SUBAGIO & M. Yunus HARYADI, 2020. "Regional Intergovernmental Cooperation In Marine Natural Resources Policy In Indonesia," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 97-117, June.
    2. Anna VORONTSOVA & Tetiana VASYLIEVA. & Yuriy BILAN & Grzegorz OSTASZ & Tetyana MAYBORODA, 2020. "The Influence Of State Regulation Of Education For Achieving The Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study Of Central And Eastern European Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 6-26, June.
    3. Iryna TKACHUK & Olena VINNYCHUK, 2020. "Impact Of Specific Macroeconomic Indicators On The Formation Of Revenues Of Non-Governmental Organizations From Personal Contributions Of The Ukrainian Population," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 64-77, June.
    4. Agota Giedre RAIŠIENE & , Svitlana BILAN & Vainius SMALSKYS & Jolita GECIENE, 2019. "Emerging Changes In Attitudes To Inter-Institutional Collaboration: The Case Of Organizations Providing Social Services In Communities," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 34-56, December.
    5. Beata SLUSARCZYK & Adnan UL HAQUE, 2019. "Public Services For Business Environment: Challenges For Implementing Industry 4.0 In Polish And Canadian Logistic Enterprises," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 57-76, December.
    6. Ilir TOMORRI & Remzi KECO & Gentjan MEHMETI & Shpresim DOMI, 2020. "The Performance Assessment Of Public Sector In Albania," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 170-180, June.
    7. Rasha Fady Ismail & Fadi Safieddine & Rawad Hammad & Mazhar Hallak Kantakji, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Production Processes Reengineering: Case Study at INCOM Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Regmi, Rupesh & Zhang, Zhuo & Zhang, Hongpeng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship strategy, natural resources management and sustainable performance: A study of an emerging market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    9. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Andri Ottesen & Dieter Thom & Rupali Bhagat & Rola Mourdaa, 2023. "Learning from the Future of Kuwait: Scenarios as a Learning Tool to Build Consensus for Actions Needed to Realize Vision 2035," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Sniezyk & Dominika Mankowska, 2021. "Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 175-195.
    14. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    15. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Elvira Nica & Florin Cristian Ciurlău & Mihaela Comănescu & Teodora Bițoiu, 2017. "Stabilizing Valences of an Optimum Monetary Zone in a Resilient Economy—Approaches and Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Yamina Chouaibi & Matteo Rossi & Ghazi Zouari, 2021. "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive Compensation on Implicit Cost of Equity: Evidence from French ESG Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Anca Mehedintu & Georgeta Soava & Mihaela Sterpu, 2019. "Remittances, Migration and Gross Domestic Product from Romania’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Valentin PAUNA & Amelia DIACONU & Svetlana PLATAGEA GOMBOS & Raluca Iuliana GEORGESCU, 2022. "Banking management in the prism liquidity – profitability interrelation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(630), S), pages 93-100, Spring.
    19. Zuzana Virglerova & Eva Ivanova & Jan Dvorsky & Jaroslav Belas & Tomáš Krulický, 2021. "Selected factors of internationalisation and their impact on the SME perception of the market risk," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1011-1032, December.
    20. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Sutee Wangtueai, 2024. "Impact of Industry 5.0 Readiness on Sustainable Business Growth of Marine Food Processing SMEs in Thailand," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    information and communication technologies; implementation and development of e-government; E-Government Development Index; E-Participation Index; public services; web portal.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2020:y:2020:i:34:p:118-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.