IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6564-d825700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Production Processes Reengineering: Case Study at INCOM Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Rasha Fady Ismail

    (School of Business, University of Hertfordshire, Global Academic Foundation, R5 New Garden City, New Administrative Capital, Cairo 11765, Egypt)

  • Fadi Safieddine

    (School of Architecture, Computing and Engineering, University of East London, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Rawad Hammad

    (School of Architecture, Computing and Engineering, University of East London, London E16 2RD, UK)

  • Mazhar Hallak Kantakji

    (Business School, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Sultan Ismail, Kuala Lumpur 50250, Malaysia)

Abstract

INCOM Egypt has undergone automation in some processes where critical aspects of its operations are transformed and automated. This paper presents an overview of INCOM Egypt processes using Ould Riva and analyses the process of ‘handling a product’. It aims to demonstrate effective automation of the production of wires and cables process accompanied to Industry 4.0 while considering environmental and economic sustainability goals that were inhibited by COVID-19 restrictions. Ould’s Riva method is used to analyse the production process of wires and cables to propose improvements for automating the process. Business process modelling is utilised to study the processes for clearer understating. The flow of information within the process is also analysed to integrate the production process with other processes and supply chains, which helps to identify which production activities can be automated and mainstreamed into the information flow to achieve environmental and economic sustainability. The context of INCOM Egypt, as a case study, is presented along with the Riva model of its operations. The paper identifies the before, i.e., As-Is process, and after, i.e., To-Be Process, automation of the ‘handle a product’ process using the Role Activity Diagram (RAD). The process involved redesigning and improving different activities to increase resource-use efficiency to participate in achieving the goals of sustainability. The focus of this paper is to investigate the negative impact of COVID-19 on sustainability and to examine the accomplishments of process automation of wire production towards environmental and economic sustainability. The results of the research reveal a relationship between business process modelling and sustainability. Moreover, automation of processes (Industry 4.0) is found to reduce the negative effect of COVID-19 on production. A triangulation between process modelling, process automation (Industry 4.0), and sustainability was determined. Each one is reinforcing and impacting one another. The RAD model demonstrates that automation of the activities in the process reduces waste, time, cost, and redundant processes as factors of sustainability, which may also help to lessen the unfavorable effects of the pandemic. The results proved generalisation on other organisations in the same line of business.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasha Fady Ismail & Fadi Safieddine & Rawad Hammad & Mazhar Hallak Kantakji, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Production Processes Reengineering: Case Study at INCOM Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6564-:d:825700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rasha Fady & Rasha Abd El Aziz, 2012. "Process architecture and process modelling in the Egyptian industry: the case of Incom," International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 33-42.
    2. Fatemeh Jouzi & Katariina Koistinen & Lassi Linnanen, 2021. "Time as a Subject in Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Sebastian Kot & Armenia Androniceanu & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Premysl Pisar & Diana Bilkova, 2019. "Controlling as a tool for SME management with an emphasis on innovations in the context of Industry 4.0," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(4), pages 763-785, December.
    5. Eleonora Bottani & Giuseppe Vignali, 2019. "Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 284-310, March.
    6. Claude Villeneuve & David Tremblay & Olivier Riffon & Georges Y. Lanmafankpotin & Sylvie Bouchard, 2017. "A Systemic Tool and Process for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    7. Kluczek, Aldona, 2019. "An energy-led sustainability assessment of production systems – An approach for improving energy efficiency performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 190-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihai Andronie & George Lăzăroiu & Roxana Ștefănescu & Cristian Uță & Irina Dijmărescu, 2021. "Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Dagmar Cagáňová & Martin Fero & Miloš Čambál, 2019. "Perceived Serviceability of Outplacement Programs as a Part of Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Luo Fan & Mohammad Tazul Islam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Regmi, Rupesh & Zhang, Zhuo & Zhang, Hongpeng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship strategy, natural resources management and sustainable performance: A study of an emerging market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    6. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    7. Sarva Mangala Praveena & Sri Themudu, 2022. "Water Conservation Initiative In A Public School From Tropical Country: Performance And Sustainability Assessments," Water Conservation & Management (WCM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 55-60, February.
    8. Matheus B. Frare & Ana P. C. Clauberg & Simone Sehnem & Lucila M. S. Campos & Juliano Spuldaro, 2020. "Toward a sustainable development indicators system for small municipalities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1148-1167, September.
    9. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    10. Serhiy SHKARLET & Igor OLIYCHENKO & Maksym DUBYNA & Maryna DITKOVSKA & Vladimir ZHOVTOK, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 118-136, June.
    11. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    13. Andri Ottesen & Dieter Thom & Rupali Bhagat & Rola Mourdaa, 2023. "Learning from the Future of Kuwait: Scenarios as a Learning Tool to Build Consensus for Actions Needed to Realize Vision 2035," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Vera Gelashvili & Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & Miguel Ángel Gómez-Borja, 2024. "Does the intensity of use of social media influence the economic sustainability of the university?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 19-43, February.
    16. Li, Feng & Zhang, Danlu & Zhang, Jinyu & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Measuring the energy production and utilization efficiency of Chinese thermal power industry with the fixed-sum carbon emission constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    17. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Monika Adamczyk & Alina Betlej, 2021. "Social determinants of digital exclusion in an ageing society. The case of Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 122-135, March.
    19. David Tremblay & Sabine Gowsy & Olivier Riffon & Jean-François Boucher & Samuel Dubé & Claude Villeneuve, 2021. "A Systemic Approach for Sustainability Implementation Planning at the Local Level by SDG Target Prioritization: The Case of Quebec City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Amoah John & Nutakor Felix & Li Jinke & Jibril Abdul Bashiru & Sanful Benjamin & Odei Michael Amponsah, 2021. "Antecedents of social media usage intensity in the financial sector of an emerging economy: a Pls-Sem Algorithm," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 387-406, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6564-:d:825700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.