IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v15y2023i2p17-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Performance In The Public And Private Sectors In Romania: The Balanced Scorecard Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Alexandra OLARIU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ștefan Cătălin POPA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andreea BREAZU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cătălina Florentina POPA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In today's fast-paced world, performance measurement is not just an option, it is a necessity. It is the only way to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and drive meaningful change. Our research objective is to conduct an analysis of organizational performance in the public and private sectors, using all four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework. This examination will encompass financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth perspectives. Therefore, we used a quantitative research method and administered a questionnaire to assess organizational performance in both the public and private sectors in all development regions of Romania. The data collected from the 233 respondents were tested to assess the distribution of the variables of interest, and a first element of research interest was to identify the differences between the public and private sectors in terms of organizational performance using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. The results of the research suggest that, overall, employees in private sector organizations value to a greater extent the recording of organizational performance viewed from all four perspectives of the BSC at the level of the organization from which they come, compared to those in public sector organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Alexandra OLARIU & Ștefan Cătălin POPA & Andreea BREAZU & Cătălina Florentina POPA, 2023. "Organizational Performance In The Public And Private Sectors In Romania: The Balanced Scorecard Perspective," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 17-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:17-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no152/f2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inese Mavlutova & Santa Babauska, 2013. "The Competitiveness and Balanced Scorecard of Health Care Companies," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 131-148.
    2. Alina CHIŢU & Mădălina Elena OPRIŞ, 2014. "Importance of financial perspective indicators in Balanced Scorecard in a leasing company," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(8(597)), pages 57-66, August.
    3. Richard Pryke, 1982. "The comparative performance of public and private enterprise," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 68-81, July.
    4. Simona Cãtãlina ?TEFAN, 2018. "Do The Management Tools Care For Health Organizations?," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 89-101, December.
    5. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Robert S. Kaplan, 2012. "The balanced scorecard: comments on balanced scorecard commentaries," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 539-545, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bozec, Richard, 2004. "L’analyse comparative de la performance entre les entreprises publiques et les entreprises privées : le problème de mesure et son impact sur les résultats," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(4), pages 619-654, Décembre.
    2. Muh. Ardiansyah Syam & Syahril Djaddang & Adam Adam & Endang Etty Merawati & Mohammad Roziq, 2024. "Carbon Accounting: Its Implications on Accounting Practices and Corporate Sustainability Reports," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 178-187, July.
    3. Alina Nicoleta DOBRE & Andreea BREAZU & Simona Catalina STEFAN, 2021. "The Influence Of Romanian Students’ Choices In Higher Education On Employment Rate And Job Satisfaction," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 735-746, November.
    4. Cook, Paul & Fabella, Raul V., 1997. "The Welfare and Political Economy Dimensions of Private vs State Enterprise," General Discussion Papers 30561, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    5. Plūmiņš Māris & Ščeulovs Deniss, 2016. "Development of State-Owned Enterprises of Transport Industry in Latvia," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 65-75, August.
    6. Jean-Jacques Santini, 1986. "Les dénationalisations britanniques : objectifs et réalisations," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(5), pages 47-69.
    7. Simona Catalina Stefan & Ion Popa & Cosmin Octavian Dobrin, 2016. "Towards a Model of Sustainable Competitiveness of Health Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. David Naranjo-Gil & María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito & Laura Gómez-Ruiz, 2016. "Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Muhammad Yusuf Amin & Noor Hassan & Syed Imran Khan, 2019. "Does the Impact of State Ownership on Financial Performance of Firms Vary across different Sectors in China?," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(3), pages 24-32, September.
    10. Bjuggren, Per-Olof & af Donner, Henrik, 2002. "Ownership of a cultural landmark: The case of Gotha Canal," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 499-519, May.
    11. Kamath Shyam J., 1994. "Privatization: A Market Prospect Perspective," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 53-104, March.
    12. Chen, Gongmeng & Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver, 2006. "Have China's enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 82-109, March.
    13. Mohammad Alboliteeh & Maha Sanat Alrashidi & Nojoud Alrashedi & Analita Gonzales & Romeo Jr Mostoles & Eddieson Pasay-an & Wireen Leila Dator, 2022. "Knowledge Management and Sustainability Performance of Hospital Organisations: The Healthcare Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Cooper, William W. & Gallegos, Armando & Granof, Michael H., 1995. "A Delphi study of goals and evaluation criteria of state and privately owned Latin American airlines," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 273-285, December.
    15. Yan Hong & Gangwei Cai & Zhoujin Mo & Weijun Gao & Lei Xu & Yuanxing Jiang & Jinming Jiang, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Tourist Satisfaction with B&B in Zhejiang, China: An Importance–Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Juan Carlos Morales Piñero & Joaquim Vergés i Jaime, 2007. "Public Enterprise Reforms and Efficiency in Regulated Enviroments," Working Papers 0702, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Jan 2007.
    17. Vergés, Joaquim, 2014. "Eficiencia comparativa Empresa Pública vs. Empresa Privada: La evidencia empírica [Comparative efficiency of Public-owned vs. Private-owned companies: The empirical evidence]," MPRA Paper 58816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Suárez-Gargallo, Carlos & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2023. "A comprehensive bibliometric study of the balanced scorecard," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Villalonga, Belen, 2000. "Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 43-74, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:17-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.