IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v14y2020i1p752-760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes To Workplace Diversity €“ Main Findings In A Global Context

Author

Listed:
  • Radu-Dan IRINI
  • Anca BORZA

Abstract

One of the focal points of research in the diversity management discourse has been analyzing how the managers and other decision-makers perceived diversity while less focus has been placed on the employee's attitudes toward workplace diversity. In order to develop the present analysis, a systematic review was chosen to investigate previous literature on diversity management, workplace diversity, and employee attitudes toward diversity. The first objective of our paper is to identify if there is an alignment between the main findings of the studies that focused on measuring the attitudes to workplace diversity, determining the relation between context and diverse attitudes. The second objective is to analyze the preferred methodologies used by researchers to gather empirical evidence as the subject of measuring attitudes to workforce diversity has been fairly understudied in the diversity management discourse. The findings from 14 national contexts suggest either neutral or positive attitudes to workplace diversity, with a high influence of context and modest generalizability of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu-Dan IRINI & Anca BORZA, 2020. "Attitudes To Workplace Diversity €“ Main Findings In A Global Context," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 752-760, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:752-760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conferinta.management.ase.ro/archives/2020/PDF/4_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina LECA & Carmen A. VRÂNCEANU, 2014. "Multicultural Teams: Moving From Diveristyto Inclusion," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 361-368, November.
    2. Sophie Hennekam & Loubna Tahssain-Gay, 2015. "Changing attitudes towards diversity: The Netherlands and Morocco compared," Post-Print hal-01795340, HAL.
    3. Barbara S. Lawrence, 1997. "Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Harold Andrew Patrick & Vincent Raj Kumar, 2012. "Managing Workplace Diversity," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(2), pages 21582440124, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    2. Jeong, Nara & Kim, Nari & Arthurs, Jonathan D., 2021. "The CEO’s tenure life cycle, corporate social responsibility and the moderating role of the CEO’s political orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 464-474.
    3. Sonja Sperber & Christian Linder, 2018. "The impact of top management teams on firm innovativeness: a configurational analysis of demographic characteristics, leadership style and team power distribution," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 285-316, January.
    4. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
    5. Sabina Tasheva & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 0. "The role of global dynamic managerial capability in the pursuit of international strategy and superior performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    6. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    7. Theresa S. Cho & Donald C. Hambrick, 2006. "Attention as the Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change: The Case of Airline Deregulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 453-469, August.
    8. Jianbin Wei & Yanzhao Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Tom Management Team Heterogeneity on Corporate Performance - An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Listed Companies from 2008-2019," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4.
    9. Daniel Leunbach & Truls Erikson & Max Rapp-Ricciardi, 2020. "Muddling through Akerlofian and Knightian uncertainty: The role of sociobehavioral integration, positive affective tone, and polychronicity," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 145-164, June.
    10. Mukherjee Subhasree & Dhayanithy Deepak, 2017. "Effect of Inter-organizational Network on TMT – Entry Mode Choice relationship," Working papers 246, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    11. Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) & Kim, Tae-Yeol & Lee, Deog-Ro, 2016. "Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3231-3239.
    12. F. Pinar Acar, 2016. "The effects of top management team composition on SME export performance: an upper echelons perspective," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 24(4), pages 833-852, December.
    13. Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Pedro M. Romero-Fernandez & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2012. "Effects of Diversity on Group Decision-Making Processes: The Moderating Role of Human Resource Management," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 677-701, September.
    14. Michaela Wrede & Tobias Dauth, 2020. "A temporal perspective on the relationship between top management team internationalization and firms' innovativeness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 542-561, June.
    15. Valenzuela, Marcus A. & Flinchbaugh, Carol & Rogers, Sean Edmund, 2020. "Can organizations help adjust?: The effect of perceived organizational climate on immigrants' acculturation and consequent effect on perceived fit," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    16. Yana SELIVERSTOVA & Anita PIEROG, 2021. "A Theoretical Study On Global Workforce Diversity Management, Its Benefits And Challenges," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 117-124, July.
    17. Ibrahim Sameer, 2021. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on organization’s financial performance: evidence from Maldives public limited companies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    19. Darwin Joseph R. & Palanisamy Chinnathambi Selvaraj, 2015. "The Effects of Work Force Diversity on Employee Performance in Singapore Organisations," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 17-29, March.
    20. Christine M. Beckman & M. Diane Burton, 2008. "Founding the Future: Path Dependence in the Evolution of Top Management Teams from Founding to IPO," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 3-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:752-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.