IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v12y2018i1p862-878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Creation And Value Added In Blockchain Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kai CHEN
  • Roxana STEGEREAN
  • Razvan Liviu NISTOR

Abstract

Blockchain technology has been evolved in the last years and its area of utilization has been increased, also. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between organizations using the above mentioned technology and value, to identify the general and specific sources of value, respectively. The evaluation of value perceptions is a long-term research while the blockchain-based projects are very recent. Therefore, the value creation and value added concepts are very helpful for start-ups, entrepreneurs as well as stakeholders. Considering the untraditional management of such organization the paper presents the traditional approach of value- created and added and adapts them in the area of information technology through the specific instrument of these businesses- smart contract. Also, how other aspects like decentralized management or virtual coin could develop value for business are discussed. The outcome is that the paper offers some conclusions which could be helpful for investors but, more important for those who want to develop projects using this new technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai CHEN & Roxana STEGEREAN & Razvan Liviu NISTOR, 2018. "Value Creation And Value Added In Blockchain Technology," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 862-878, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:862-878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2018/pdf/5_10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Arvidsson & Alessandro Caliandro & Massimo Airoldi & Stefania Barina, 2016. "Crowds and Value : Italian Directioners on Twitter," Post-Print hal-02312192, HAL.
    2. J. E. King & Michael McLure, 2014. "History of the Concept of Value," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 14-06, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Ricardo,David, 2015. "On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108075435, November.
    4. Fernandes, António S.C., 2012. "Assessing the technology contribution to value added," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 281-297.
    5. Venkatraman, N. & Henderson, John C. & Oldach, Scott, 1993. "Continuous strategic alignment: Exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 139-149, June.
    6. Amy J. Hillman & Gerald D. Keim, 2001. "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 125-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Liu & Zulan Yang & Mingjie Liang & Yi Liu & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework for Blockchain Enhanced Information Modeling for Healing and Therapeutic Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    2. Nigel Martin & John Rice, 2010. "Analysing emission intensive firms as regulatory stakeholders: a role for adaptable business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 64-75, January.
    3. Garcia-Meca, Emma & Martinez, Isabel, 2007. "The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81.
    4. Matthew W. Sherwood & Julia L. Pollard, 2018. "The risk-adjusted return potential of integrating ESG strategies into emerging market equities," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 26-44, January.
    5. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.
    6. Ferrell, Allen & Liang, Hao & Renneboog, Luc, 2016. "Socially responsible firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 585-606.
    7. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.
    8. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    9. Feng, Jingwen & Goodell, John W. & Shen, Dehua, 2022. "ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    10. Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Toktarova, Alla & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Transition towards 100% renewable power and heat supply for energy intensive economies and severe continental climate conditions: Case for Kazakhstan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_013 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pascual Berrone & Jordi Surroca & Josep Tribó, 2007. "Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance: A Test of the Mediating Role of Stakeholder Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 35-53, November.
    13. Khine Kyaw & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement and firms' innovation: Evidence from LGBT‐supportive policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1285-1298, July.
    14. Zelong Wei & Hao Shen & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li, 2017. "How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 209-223, January.
    15. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "An integrated theory of the firm approach to environmental, social and governance performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1567-1598, April.
    16. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    17. Yue Vaughan & Yinyoung Rhou & Yoon Koh & Manisha Singal, 2024. "Slack resources and employee-centered corporate social responsibility in restaurant companies," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(3), pages 592-614, May.
    18. Groening, Christopher & Kanuri, Vamsi Krishna, 2013. "Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1852-1860.
    19. Lucy W. Lu, 2021. "The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 193-206, September.
    20. Wenbin Sun & Shanji Yao & Rahul Govind, 2019. "Reexamining Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: The Inverted-U-Shaped Relationship and the Moderation of Marketing Capability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 1001-1017, December.
    21. Zyglidopoulos, Stelios C. & Georgiadis, Andreas P. & Carroll, Craig E. & Siegel, Donald S., 2012. "Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1622-1627.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:862-878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.