IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/compca/v16y2020i1p79-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics in Organizations – a Key-Value Making A Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Matilda SABIE

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Iulia ÅžANTA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Cătălina Oana DUMITRESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Anca Georgeta LUÈšAN (PETRE)

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Business ethics are a field with a dynamic evolution in organizations, with key-values shaping the corporate culture of companies and as well the profile of employees. Business ethics become more and more important as an element of the corporate culture to be shared and promoted by each employee. This is the consequence of the fact that nowadays companies rather hire an attitude than technical skills which can be anyway trained on the job. Ethical behavior in compliance with ethical codes, moral in business and reliability become key-values of the corporate culture and of the assessment of employees. The present paper gives new perspectives regarding the role of ethics in organizations as a key-factor making the difference as a competitive advantage for standing out of the line and for delimitation from other competitors on the market. The present paper proposes an interdisciplinary research approach, based on the assessment of business, economics, psychology and legal aspects related to business ethics in organizations and their importance for the human resources management. In accordance with modern trends in academia, qualitative methods, such as the questionnaire and the SWOT-analysis are used in order to investigate the research hypothesis and to formulate research results. The research findings can be developed and used in human resources departments dealing with this interesting issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Matilda SABIE & Ana-Maria Iulia ÅžANTA & Cătălina Oana DUMITRESCU & Anca Georgeta LUÈšAN (PETRE), 2020. "Ethics in Organizations – a Key-Value Making A Difference," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 79-82, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:79-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://confcamp.ase.ro/2020/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/09-Sabie_Santa_Dumitrescu_LutanPetre.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Lindebaum & Deanna Geddes & Yiannis Gabriel, 2017. "Moral Emotions and Ethics in Organisations: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(4), pages 645-656, April.
    2. John Bruhn, 2009. "The Functionality of Gray Area Ethics in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 205-214, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arzi Adbi, 2023. "Financial Sustainability of For-Profit Versus Non-Profit Microfinance Organizations Following a Scandal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 57-74, November.
    2. Nilupulee Liyanagamage & Mario Fernando & Belinda Gibbons, 2023. "The Emotional Machiavellian: Interactions Between Leaders and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 657-673, September.
    3. Yueqiao Qiao & Zhe Zhang & Ming Jia, 2021. "Their Pain, Our Pleasure: How and When Peer Abusive Supervision Leads to Third Parties’ Schadenfreude and Work Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 695-711, April.
    4. Caroline Moraes & Finola Kerrigan & Roisin McCann, 2020. "Positive Shock: A Consumer Ethical Judgement Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 735-751, September.
    5. Ignasi Martí, 2018. "Transformational Business Models, Grand Challenges, and Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 965-976, November.
    6. Kyle D. Turner, 2022. "Actions in the spotlight: Differential effects of corporate social responsibility actions on organizational celebrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 860-870, July.
    7. Hamby, Anne & Orazi, Davide & Moreau, Patrick, 2024. "Whose story is this? Source reveal as a communication tactic to increase consumers’ advocacy for social causes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Zhe Zhang & Xintong Ji, 2023. "A Virtual Net Locks Me In: How and When Information and Communication Technology Use Intensity Leads to Knowledge Hiding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(3), pages 611-626, October.
    9. Lisa Ritzenhöfer & Prisca Brosi & Matthias Spörrle & Isabell M. Welpe, 2019. "Satisfied with the Job, But Not with the Boss: Leaders’ Expressions of Gratitude and Pride Differentially Signal Leader Selfishness, Resulting in Differing Levels of Followers’ Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1185-1202, September.
    10. Diele Lobo & Ana Carolina Rodriguez & Silvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova & Alexandre A. Ardichvili, 2022. "Five Practices for Building Local Capacity in Sustainability-Driven Entrepreneurship for Place-Based Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-37, March.
    11. Rosa Fioravante, 2024. "Beyond the Business Case for Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Strategic CSR in Light of Digital Washing and the Moral Human Argument," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Dewan, Yasir, 2019. "Corporate crime and punishment : The role of status and ideology," Other publications TiSEM 08d87b94-7449-4a1f-a3ae-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Anum Naz & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2021. "Ethical Leadership and Deviant Workplace Behaviour: The Role Ethical Reasoning, LMX, Distributive Justice, and Psychological Safety and Attachment in a Moderated Mediation Framework," Global Journal of Educational Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, December.
    14. William Bishop, 2013. "The Role of Ethics in 21st Century Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 635-637, December.
    15. Victor M. Mercader Pomaron, 2017. "Relationship Of Productivity, Ethics, Decision Making And Happiness (Relacion De La Productividad, La Etica, La Toma De Decisiones Y La Felicidad)," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 10(6), pages 87-104.
    16. Shuwen Li & Ruiqian Jia & Juergen H. Seufert & Jinlian Luo & Rui Sun, 2023. "You may not reap what you sow: How and when ethical leadership promotes subordinates’ online helping behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1683-1702, December.
    17. Julia Zwank & Marjo-Riitta Diehl & Mario Gollwitzer, 2024. "The Corporate Samaritan: Advancing Understanding of the Role of Deontic Motive in Justice Enactment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 607-623, March.
    18. Rezwan Ullah & Muhammad Zada & Imran Saeed & Jawad Khan & Muhammad Shahbaz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2021. "Have You Heard That—“GOSSIP”? Gossip Spreads Rapidly and Influences Broadly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Farrar, Jonathan & Hausserman, Cass & Rennie, Morina, 2019. "The influence of revenge and financial rewards on tax fraud reporting intentions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 102-116.
    20. Misbah Hayat Bhatti & Umair Akram & Muhammad Hasnat Bhatti & Hassan Rasool & Xin Su, 2020. "Unraveling the Effects of Ethical Leadership on Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Roles of Subjective Well-Being and Social Media in the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:79-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Popescu Irina Ruxandra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.