IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relative Effects of Public and Private Capital on Guyana's Economic Performance, 1980 to 2018: A Cointegration Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • MODESTE, NELSON

    (College of Business, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA)

Abstract

Using data from Guyana for the period 1980-2018, this paper examines two issues. The first issue studied in the paper is the relative effects of public and private capital on Guyana’s economic performance. The second issue investigated is the sources of output growth for the economy. To examine the first issue, a Cobb-Douglas production function, expressed in the form of a conditional autoregressive distributed lag equation, is applied. While for the second issue, a growth accounting expression is used. Two key empirical results emerge from this study. The first is that public capital has exerted, on the country’s economic growth, a greater impact than private capital. Notwithstanding this finding, the second key result is that both public and private capital are found to be statistically significant in growing the economy over the long run. Given these results, a major implication arising from the empirical analysis in this study is the need for expansion in both public and private capital to facilitate the growth of the economy, over the long run. Gli effetti relativi del capitale pubblico e privato sulla performance economica della Guyana nel periodo 1980-2018: un’analisi di cointegrazione Questo articolo prende in esame due problemi utilizzando i dati della Guyana nel periodo 1980-2018. Il primo sono gli effetti relativi del capitale pubblico e privato sulla performance economica del paese. Il secondo esamina le fonti della crescita economica del paese. Per analizzare il primo problema, si applica una funzione di produzione Cobb-Douglas, stimata con il metodo ARDL. Per analizzare il secondo problema, invece, è utilizzata la contabilità della crescita. Dallo studio emergono due risultati empirici chiave. Il primo è che il capitale pubblico ha un impatto maggiore del capitale privato sulla crescita economica del paese. Nonostante ciò, il secondo risultato chiave è che sia il capitale pubblico che quello privato risultano essere statisticamente significativi nella crescita economica di lungo periodo del paese. In considerazione di ciò, l’implicazione che emerge dall’analisi empirica di questo studio è la necessità di aumentare sia il capitale pubblico che quello privato per facilitare la crescita economica di lungo periodo del paese.

Suggested Citation

  • Modeste, Nelson, 2024. "The Relative Effects of Public and Private Capital on Guyana's Economic Performance, 1980 to 2018: A Cointegration Analysis," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 77(3), pages 463-482.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iei1946.it/article/pdf/download/733/the-relative-effects-of-public-and-private-capital-on-guyanas-economic-performance-1980-to-2018-a-cointegration-analysis
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alicia H. Munnell, 1990. "Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Jan, pages 3-22.
    2. Garikai Makuyana & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2017. "Public and private investment and economic growth in Zimbabwe: An empirical test," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(1), pages 60-76, March.
    3. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    4. MAKUYANA, Garikai & ODHIAMBO, Nicholas M., 2018. "Public and Private Investment and Economic Growth in Zambia: A Dynamic Approach," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 71(4), pages 503-526.
    5. Miguel D. Ramirez & Nader Nazmi, 2003. "Public Investment and Economic Growth in Latin America: an Empirical Test," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 115-126, February.
    6. Mr. Dhaneshwar Ghura, 1997. "Private Investment and Endogenous Growth: Evidence From Cameroon," IMF Working Papers 1997/165, International Monetary Fund.
    7. António Afonso & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2009. "Macroeconomic Rates Of Return Of Public And Private Investment: Crowding‐In And Crowding‐Out Effects," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 77(s1), pages 21-39, September.
    8. Paresh Kumar Narayan, 2005. "The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(17), pages 1979-1990.
    9. Marianna Belloc & Pietro Vertova, 2004. "How Does Public Investment Affect Economic Growth in HIPC? An Empirical Assessment," Department of Economics University of Siena 416, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    10. Mr. Christian H. Beddies, 1999. "Investment, Capital Accumulation, and Growth: Some Evidence from The Gambia 1964–98," IMF Working Papers 1999/117, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Nader Nazmi & Miguel D. Ramirez, 1997. "Public And Private Investment And Economic Growth In Mexico," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(1), pages 65-75, January.
    12. Lutfi Erden & Randall G. Holcombe, 2005. "The Effects of Public Investment on Private Investment in Developing Economies," Public Finance Review, , vol. 33(5), pages 575-602, September.
    13. Serven, Luis & Solimano, Andres, 1992. "Private Investment and Macroeconomic Adjustment: A Survey," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 7(1), pages 95-114, January.
    14. M. O. Odedokun, 1997. "Relative effects of public versus private investment spending on economic efficiency and growth in developing countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1325-1336.
    15. Khalifa Ghali, 1998. "Public investment and private capital formation in a vector error-correction model of growth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 837-844.
    16. Yang Zou, 2006. "Empirical studies on the relationship between public and private investment and GDP growth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(11), pages 1259-1270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garikai Makuyana & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2017. "Public and private investment and economic growth in Zimbabwe: An empirical test," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(1), pages 60-76, March.
    2. Nishija Unnikrishnan & Thomas Paul Kattookaran, 2020. "Impact of Public and Private Infrastructure Investment on Economic Growth: Evidence from India," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(2), pages 119-138, December.
    3. Garikai Makuyana & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2019. "Public and private investment and economic growth in Malawi: an ARDL-bounds testing approach," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 673-689, January.
    4. MAKUYANA, Garikai & ODHIAMBO, Nicholas M., 2018. "Public and Private Investment and Economic Growth in Zambia: A Dynamic Approach," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 71(4), pages 503-526.
    5. Makuyana, Garikai & Odhiambo, Nicholas Mbaya, 2017. "Public and private investment and economic growth in South Africa:An empirical investigation," Working Papers 22005, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    6. Makuyana Garikai & Odhiambo Nicholas M., 2018. "Public and Private Investment and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(2), pages 87-106, August.
    7. Sofia São Marcos & Sofia Vale, 2024. "Is there a nonlinear relationship between public investment and private investment? Evidence from 21 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 887-902, January.
    8. Adegboye, Abiodun Adewale & Alimi, R. Santos, 2017. "Public – Private Investment Nexus in Developing Economies: Does Financial Sector Development Matter for Nigeria?," MPRA Paper 80908, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Ibrahim, Ngouhouo & Orfe, Chouafi Nguekam & Gilbert, Noula Armand & Honore, Tekam Oumbe, 2019. "Effects of Socio-Economic Conditions on the Relationship between Public and Private investments in the CEMAC Zone," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Sajad Ahmad Bhat & Javed Ahmad Bhat & Taufeeq Ajaz, 2020. "The Public–Private Investment Nexus In India: Evidence From A Policy Simulation Approach," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(224), pages 101-128, January –.
    11. Akçay Selçuk & Karasoy Alper, 2020. "Determinants of private investments in Turkey: Examining the role of democracy," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 23-49, March.
    12. Mallick, Hrushikesh & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Sahoo, Manoranjan, 2018. "Is crude oil price detrimental to domestic private investment for an emerging economy? The role of public sector investment and financial sector development in an era of globalization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 307-324.
    13. Augustin Ntembe & Aloysius Ajab Amin & Regina Tawah, 2018. "Analysis of public investments and economic growth in Cameroon," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(3), pages 591-614, July.
    14. Lutfi Erden & Randall G. Holcombe, 2006. "The Linkage Between Public and Private Investment: A Co-integration Analysis of a Panel of Developing Countries," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 479-492, Summer.
    15. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles, 2011. "Linking Investment and Fiscal Policies," Working Papers Department of Economics 2011/16, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    16. Chiara DEL BO, 2009. "Recent advances in public investment, fiscal policy and growth," Departmental Working Papers 2009-25, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    17. Ali, Amjad & Ur Rehman, Hafeez, 2015. "Macroeconomic Instability and Its Impact on Gross Domestic Product: An Empirical Analysis of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 71037, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. A. Nurul Hossain & Syed Hasanuzzaman, 2013. "Remittances and investment nexus in Bangladesh: an ARDL bounds testing approach," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(4), pages 387-407, December.
    19. Nelson C. Modeste, 2021. "Efficiency-adjusted Public Capital and Economic Growth in Guyana: A Cointegration Analysis," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(2), pages 187-199, June.
    20. Russell E. Triplett & Nilufer Ozdemir & Paul M. Mason, 2022. "Structural Change in the Investment Function," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(1), pages 220-236, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Guyana; Public Capital; Private Capital; Economic Growth; Sources of Economic Growth; Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model; Bounds Testing Approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.