IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v68y1992i4p647-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Méthodologies néo-classique et post-classique

Author

Listed:
  • De Vroey, Michel

    (Département de sciences économiques, Université Catholique de Louvain)

Abstract

Our article provides a critical assessment of the Walrasian research program. It is based on an original methodogical viewpoint, in which theories are seen as languages. It examines the rationale for developing alternative research programs and expounds some flaws of the "post-classical synthesis". À partir d’une conception méthodologique originale, dans laquelle les théories sont vues comme des langages, nous présentons une évaluation critique du programme de recherche walrasien. Sans conclure négativement quant à la fécondité de ce dernier, nous défendons l’idée que le développement d’approches alternatives a lieu d’être encouragé mais qu’à cet égard la « synthèse post-classique » ne constitue pas la voie la plus intéressante.

Suggested Citation

  • De Vroey, Michel, 1992. "Méthodologies néo-classique et post-classique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 68(4), pages 647-664, décembre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:68:y:1992:i:4:p:647-664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/602089ar
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bowles, Samuel, 1985. "The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian Models," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 16-36, March.
    2. De Vroey, Michel, 1990. "The Base Camp Paradox: A Reflection on the Place of Tâtonnement in General Equilibrium Theory," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 235-253, October.
    3. Paul Davidson, 1978. "Money and the Real World," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-349-15865-2, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jochen Hartwig, 2006. "Explaining the aggregate price level with Keynes's principle of effective demand," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 469-492.
    2. Paul M. Mason, 1985. "An Assessment of Tobin's Interpretation of Keynes' Liquidity Preference Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 29(2), pages 49-54, October.
    3. Boyer, Robert, 1992. "La crise de la macroéconomie, une conséquence de la méconnaissance des institutions?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 68(1), pages 43-68, mars et j.
    4. Engelbert Stockhammer & Rafael Wildauer, 2016. "Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(6), pages 1609-1634.
    5. Frisvold, George B., 2005. "Transaction Costs and Institutional Innovations in Agricultural Labor Contracts," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19495, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Parker Gladys Foster, 1990. "Keynes and Kalecki on Saving and Profit: Some Implications," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 415-422, June.
    7. Sheila Dow, 2012. "Uncertainty-Denial," Department Discussion Papers 1204, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    8. Janet Walsh, 1993. "Internalization v. Decentralization: An Analysis of Recent Developments in Pay Bargaining," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 409-432, September.
    9. Petrick, Martin, 2018. "A microeconomic model of worker motivation based on monetary and non-monetary incentives," IAMO Discussion Papers 274821, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Dragoș Adăscăliței & Jason Heyes & Pedro Mendonça, 2022. "The intensification of work in Europe: A multilevel analysis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 324-347, June.
    11. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    12. Marcelo de Oliveira Passos & José Luís Oreiro, 2008. "A post Keynesian macrodynamic simulation model for an open economy," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211235250, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    13. Carter, Michael R. & Zimmerman, Frederick J., 2000. "The dynamic cost and persistence of asset inequality in an agrarian economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 265-302, December.
    14. Max Albert & Jürgen Meckl, 2003. "Involuntary Unemployment and the Existence of GDP Functions," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 79-88, February.
    15. Burdin, Gabriel & Dughera, Stefano & Landini, Fabio & Belloc, Filippo, 2023. "Contested Transparency: Digital Monitoring Technologies and Worker Voice," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1340, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Figueroa, Adolfo, 1994. "La naturaleza del mercado laboral," El Trimestre Económico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, vol. 61(242), pages 335-360, abril-jun.
    17. Frederick Guy & Peter Skott, 2008. "Power, Productivity, and Profits," Springer Books, in: Matthew Braham & Frank Steffen (ed.), Power, Freedom, and Voting, chapter 20, pages 385-403, Springer.
    18. Paul Davidson, 1991. "Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 129-143, Winter.
    19. John F. Brothwell, 1986. "after Fifty Years: Why Are We Not All Keynesians Now?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 531-547, July.
    20. Sheila Dow, 1982. "Substantive Mountains and Methodological Molehills: A Rejoinder," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 304-308, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:68:y:1992:i:4:p:647-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Benoit Dostie to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.