IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v12y2023i4p597-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance: Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Muhammad Ahsan Mukhtar

    (University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Farah Nasreen

    (University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Waleed Khalid

    (NUML University, Islamabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

This paper therefore conducts much detail with regard to the moderating role of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and firm performance with special reference to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of Pakistan. The conceptual framework leans on the proposition by Teece Pisano and Shuen (1997) that dynamic capabilities allow reconfiguration of resources for the changing market demand and hence the source of competitive advantage to the firm. It is theoretically possible that empirical studies on the moderating effect of environmental dynamism are possible and still scarce within this domain—an even more rare context in the case of Pakistani SMEs. Thereby this research intends to fill that gap by empirically examining how the influence of environmental dynamism plays out at the dynamic capabilities-performance nexus in Pakistani SMEs—a sector pivotal for the economic growth of the nation but also challenged by a unique blend of local business conditions. Understanding how firms can benefit from their dynamic capabilities in relation to their performance in volatile markets has become important within this fast-changing business environment. This paper therefore through an intensive review of the literature traces the development of the dynamic capability theory in highlighting its relevance for firm performance and the critical roles environmental dynamism has played as one of the most emphasized contextual factors in firm performance. Quantitative research design will be used for data collection from a broad base of industries under the SME sector of Pakistan and it will be collected through cross-sectional surveys to explore the proposed relationships. Findings have revealed an environmental dynamism-relevant moderating effect on the relationship between dynamic capabilities and performance. That is to say, in the most volatile environments SME performance will be more dependent on dynamic capabilities, and that dependence will imply that the strategic value of the capabilities would become contingent on the level of environmental dynamism. This is congruent with the resource-based view (RBV) theory of strategy: the strategic value of resources and capabilities depends on the fit that such resources will have with the external environment. Implications for managers and policymakers therefore could be said to be very pragmatic since SMEs operating within such dynamic markets would have a crying need to develop and deploy dynamic capabilities in a strategic way to effectively steer through the environment. First these findings contribute to theoretical development in that they draw and support from the dynamic capability view (DCV) and RBV literature in verifying the contingent value of the dynamic capability with respect to environmental dynamism. It not only adds some fertile insights into the dynamic capabilities framework within an emerging market context like Pakistan but also substantiates some interesting facets for SMEs to gain an edge on their competitive advantage within the fast-changing global business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Muhammad Ahsan Mukhtar & Dr. Farah Nasreen & Dr. Waleed Khalid, 2023. "Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance: Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 597-601.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:597-601
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/676/598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/676
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shehla Naz & Naveed Ul Haq & Sobia Nasir, 2022. "Capabilities Pathway To Firm Performance: Moderating Role Of Environmental Dynamism In The Food Manufacturing Firms Of Pakistan," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(04), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar, 2020. "The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Byung Il Park & Shufeng (Simon) Xiao, 2020. "Is exploring dynamic capabilities important for the performance of emerging market firms? The moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 57-73, January.
    4. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "Unveiling the Role of Business Freedom to Determine Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 157-164, September.
    5. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Li, Da-yuan & Liu, Juan, 2014. "Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2793-2799.
    8. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2020. "Reconsidering ordinary and dynamic capabilities in strategic change," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 377-387.
    9. Zhou, Steven S & Zhou, Abby J & Feng, Junzheng & Jiang, Shisong, 2019. "Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(5), pages 731-747, September.
    10. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borui Yan & Bo Yao & Qian Li & Qianli Dong, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities on Long-Term Performance of Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2023. "Role of opportunity creation between reconfiguration and innovation: Insights from emerging market international new ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    3. Forliano, Canio & Ferraris, Alberto & Bivona, Enzo & Couturier, Jerome, 2022. "Pouring new wine into old bottles: A dynamic perspective of the interplay among environmental dynamism, capabilities development, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 448-463.
    4. Insu Cho & Young Hoon Kwak & Jaehyeon Jun, 2019. "Sustainable Idea Development Mechanism in University Technology Commercialization (UTC): Perspectives from Dynamic Capabilities Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Haarhaus, Tim & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Tan, Fuqiang & Zhang, Qingyu & Mehrotra, Ankit & Attri, Rekha & Tiwari, Himanshi, 2024. "Unlocking venture growth: Synergizing big data analytics, artificial intelligence, new product development practices, and inter-organizational digital capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Bitencourt, Claudia Cristina & de Oliveira Santini, Fernando & Ladeira, Wagner Junior & Santos, Ana Clarissa & Teixeira, Eduardo Kunzel, 2020. "The extended dynamic capabilities model: A meta-analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 108-120.
    8. Tortora, Debora & Chierici, Roberto & Farina Briamonte, Massimiliano & Tiscini, Riccardo, 2021. "‘I digitize so I exist’. Searching for critical capabilities affecting firms’ digital innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 193-204.
    9. Jorge Ferreira & Sofia Cardim & Arnaldo Coelho, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 620-644, June.
    10. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2020. "International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    11. Owais Khan & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 3018-3033, November.
    12. Björn Michaelis & Shalini Rogbeer & Lars Schweizer & Zafer Özleblebici, 2021. "Clarifying the boundary conditions of value creation within dynamic capabilities framework: a grafting approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1797-1820, August.
    13. Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2022. "Leveraging IT-enabled dynamic capabilities to shape business process agility and firm innovative capability: moderating role of turbulent environment," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2341-2379, November.
    14. Vaneet Kaur & Versha Mehta, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage," Paradigm, , vol. 21(1), pages 31-51, June.
    15. Zhang, Yucheng & Hou, Zhongwei & Yang, Feifei & Yang, Miles M. & Wang, Zhiling, 2021. "Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 500-516.
    16. Glyptis, Loukas & Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Kvasova, Olga & Vrontis, Demetris, 2021. "Dynamic familiness capabilities and family business growth: A longitudinal perspective framed within management accounting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 346-363.
    17. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    19. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. van Uden, Annelies & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, P.A.M., 2015. "Making Sense of Industry Characteristics as Drivers of Dynamic Capabilites," Other publications TiSEM fbb2a35d-c957-489b-b170-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:597-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.