IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfe/zbefri/v34y2016i2p481-503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity of poverty in the chosen European Union countries within the period 2006-2014

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Iwacewicz-Or³owska

    (University of Finance and Management in Bia³ystok, Bia³ystok, Poland)

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to analyse the poverty level changes in the chosen European Union countries in years 2006-2014. The poverty and inequality issue gained a global dimension. Income inequality in most countries is significantly higher than thirty years ago. Analysis was based on the statistical data source The European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) for four countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia and the method of the data analysis has been used. The Gini coefficient and a people at-risk-ofpoverty or social exclusion indexes were used for this analysis. Differences in the level of poverty depends on the following determinants: the age, the territorial location, the size of the town and the most frequent activity status. Results of research shows that main groups exposed to the poverty in the chosen EU countries are above all unemployed persons and their families, young persons, children and inhabitants of towns, suburbs and rural areas. Inhabitants from outlying districts, far from the capital city of the country are threatened with the higher level of poverty in each analysed country. The results of the research prove that the poverty at different levels afflict different social groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Iwacewicz-Or³owska, 2016. "Diversity of poverty in the chosen European Union countries within the period 2006-2014," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 34(2), pages 481-503.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:34:y:2016:i:2:p:481-503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.efri.uniri.hr/sites/efri.uniri.hr/files/cr-collections/2/08-orlowska-2016-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    2. Anthony Atkinson, 2013. "Reducing income inequality in Europe," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2015. "The Origins of Inequality, and Policies to Contain It," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(2), pages 425-448, June.
    4. Bowles,Samuel, 2012. "The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107601604, October.
    5. Bowles,Samuel, 2012. "The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107014039, October.
    6. Federico Cingano, 2014. "Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 163, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kufenko, Vadim & Geloso, Vincent, 2021. "Who are the champions? Inequality, economic freedom and the Olympics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 411-427, June.
    2. European Commission, 2013. "Tax reforms in EU Member States - Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability – 2013 Report," Taxation Papers 38, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    3. McGranahan, Gordon, 2015. "Realizing the Right to Sanitation in Deprived Urban Communities: Meeting the Challenges of Collective Action, Coproduction, Affordability, and Housing Tenure," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 242-253.
    4. Justin T. Callais & Vincent Geloso, 2023. "Intergenerational income mobility and economic freedom," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 732-753, January.
    5. Taro ABE, 2015. "Egalitarianism Policy and Effective Demand under Globalization," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 374-382, September.
    6. Gabriel Porcile & Diego Sanchez-Ancochea, 2021. "Institutional change and political conflict in a structuralist model [Paths to inclusive institutions]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(6), pages 1269-1296.
    7. Tamara Merkulova & Kateryna Kononova & Margarita Deyneka, 2018. "Income inequality influence on economic growth and sustainable development," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 27-43.
    8. Javed Ahmad Khan, 2018. "Book Review: Samuel Bowles The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens, Reviewed by: Javed Ahmad Khan مراجعة علمية لكتاب: الاقتصاد الأخلاقي: لماذا الحوافز الجيدة ليست بد," Book reviews and book reports published in the Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics. 673, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute..
    9. Elisa Heinrich Mora & Jacob J. Jackson & Cate Heine & Geoffrey B. West & Vicky Chuqiao Yang & Christopher P. Kempes, 2021. "Scaling of Urban Income Inequality in the United States," Papers 2102.13150, arXiv.org.
    10. Taro Abe, 2017. "Egalitarian Policies and Effective Demand: Considering Balance of Payments," Discussion papers e-17-002, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    11. -, 2018. "The Inefficiency of Inequality. Summary / 不平等就是低效率 . 摘要," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 43567, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Riccardo Pansini & Marco Campennì & Lei Shi, 2020. "Segregating socioeconomic classes leads to an unequal redistribution of wealth," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. OHNO, Takashi, 2015. "Capital-Labor Conflict in the Harrodian model," CCES Discussion Paper Series 61, Center for Research on Contemporary Economic Systems, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Bárcena Ibarra, Alicia, 2022. "Equality at the heart of ECLAC thinking: Ideas, policies and actions from 2008 to 2022," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47996 edited by Eclac.
    15. Hiroyasu Uemura, 2019. "Social preference and civil society in the institutional analysis of capitalisms: an attempt to integrate Samuel Bowles’ The Moral Economy and Robert Boyer’s Régulation Theory," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 433-453, December.
    16. Taro Abe, 2016. "Egalitarian Policies, Effective Demand, and Globalization: Considering Budget Constraint," Discussion papers e-15-014, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    17. Mirakhor, Abbas & Ng, Adam & Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Hamid, Baharom Abdul, 2017. "Is the regime of risk transfer sustainable? Impossible contract and inequality," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 16-19.
    18. Flechtner, Svenja & Panther, Stephan, 2017. "Global and domestic inequalities and the political economy of the midde-income trap," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-29, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    19. Sharon Baute & Francesco Nicoli & Frank Vandenbroucke, 2022. "Conditional Generosity and Deservingness in Public Support for European Unemployment Risk Sharing," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 721-740, May.
    20. Ilan Wiesel & Fanqi Liu, 2021. "Conceptualising modes of redistribution in public urban infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1561-1580, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    at-risk-of-poverty rate; Gini coefficient; inequality; poverty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:34:y:2016:i:2:p:481-503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danijela Ujcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efrijhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.