IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/abd/jkaubr/673.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Book Review: Samuel Bowles The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens, Reviewed by: Javed Ahmad Khan مراجعة علمية لكتاب: الاقتصاد الأخلاقي: لماذا الحوافز الجيدة ليست بديلاً للمواطنين الجيدين - المؤلف: سامويل باولز - مراجعة : جاويد أحمد خان

Author

Listed:
  • Javed Ahmad Khan

    (Professor, Centre for West Asian Studies Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India)

Abstract

The words ‘moral’ and ‘economy’ originated in the classical intellectual world and in Aristotle’s social theory; besides the politics and ethics, economy was the third domain of practical philosophy where excessive profit making and charging of interest were not the moral practices. However, in the middle of the eighteenth century, the ‘moral economy’ got separated from the morality, and turned out to be simply a religious concept. Defining the moral economy in the 21st century on the basis of goodness, fairness, and justice is something perplexing for the proponents of market economies. But can we ignore the moral basis in our ‘ordinary business’ of life? The book under review, The Moral Economy by Samuel Bowles raises several questions in this regard and tries to show that our basic human goodness is more effective in decision making than the financial incentives. The strength of this book lies in its using different case studies and behavioral experiments with evidence-based arguments on the workable economic and financial world of the 21st century. Islamic economics is based on morality and ethics. Thus, the purpose behind the review of this path breaking work is to understand its relevance to Islamic economics that has emerged as a new paradigm in recent decades. نشأت الكلمات "الأخلاق" و "الاقتصاد" في عالم الفكر الكلاسيكي وفي النظرية الاجتماعية لأرسطو؛ إلى جانب السياسة والأخلاقيات (ethics)، كان الاقتصاد هو المجال الثالث للفلسفة العملية أو التطبيقية، حيث كان يُنظر إلى الإفراط في تحقيق الربح والتعامل بالربا كممارسات غير أخلاقية. ومع ذلك، ففي منتصف القرن الثامن عشر، انفصل "الاقتصاد الأخلاقي" عن الأخلاق، وأصبحت الأخلاق مجرد مفهوم ديني. إن محاولة تعريف الاقتصاد الأخلاقي في القرن الحادي والعشرين على أساس الخير، والعدالة، والوسطية أمر "مثير للحيرة" بالنسبة لأنصار اقتصاديات السوق (الاقتصاد الليبرالي). لكن هل يمكننا تجاهل الأسس الأخلاقية في "أعمالنا العادية" في الحياة؟ إن الكتاب قيد المراجعة، "الاقتصاد الأخلاقي" لساموئيل باولز يثير العديد من الأسئلة في هذا الصدد، ويحاول أن يوضح أن الخيرية الأساسية المرتكزة في الفطر الإنسانية أكثر فاعلية في صنع القرار من الحوافز المالية. تكمن قوة الكتاب في استخدامه لدراسة حالات مختلفة ولتجارب سلوكية متنوعة مع حجج مستندة إلى أدلة مستمدة من عالم الاقتصاد والمال القابل للتطبيق في القرن الواحد والعشرين. يعتمد الاقتصاد الإسلامي على الأخلاق والقيم. ولذا، فإن الهدف من وراء مراجعة هذا الكتاب هو فهم علاقته بالاقتصاد الإسلامي التي برزت كنموذج جديد في العقود الأخيرة.

Suggested Citation

  • Javed Ahmad Khan, 2018. "Book Review: Samuel Bowles The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens, Reviewed by: Javed Ahmad Khan مراجعة علمية لكتاب: الاقتصاد الأخلاقي: لماذا الحوافز الجيدة ليست بد," Book reviews and book reports published in the Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics. 673, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute..
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:jkaubr:673
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.31-2.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153869_31-02-11-0BReview.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.31-2.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bowles,Samuel, 2012. "The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107601604.
    2. Bowles,Samuel, 2012. "The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107014039.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. European Commission, 2013. "Tax reforms in EU Member States - Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability – 2013 Report," Taxation Papers 38, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    2. McGranahan, Gordon, 2015. "Realizing the Right to Sanitation in Deprived Urban Communities: Meeting the Challenges of Collective Action, Coproduction, Affordability, and Housing Tenure," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 242-253.
    3. Justin T. Callais & Vincent Geloso, 2023. "Intergenerational income mobility and economic freedom," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 732-753, January.
    4. Anna Iwacewicz-Or³owska, 2016. "Diversity of poverty in the chosen European Union countries within the period 2006-2014," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 34(2), pages 481-503.
    5. Taro ABE, 2015. "Egalitarianism Policy and Effective Demand under Globalization," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 374-382, September.
    6. Gabriel Porcile & Diego Sanchez-Ancochea, 2021. "Institutional change and political conflict in a structuralist model [Paths to inclusive institutions]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(6), pages 1269-1296.
    7. Tamara Merkulova & Kateryna Kononova & Margarita Deyneka, 2018. "Income inequality influence on economic growth and sustainable development," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 27-43.
    8. Elisa Heinrich Mora & Jacob J. Jackson & Cate Heine & Geoffrey B. West & Vicky Chuqiao Yang & Christopher P. Kempes, 2021. "Scaling of Urban Income Inequality in the United States," Papers 2102.13150, arXiv.org.
    9. Taro Abe, 2017. "Egalitarian Policies and Effective Demand: Considering Balance of Payments," Discussion papers e-17-002, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    10. -, 2018. "The Inefficiency of Inequality. Summary / 不平等就是低效率 . 摘要," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 43567, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Riccardo Pansini & Marco Campennì & Lei Shi, 2020. "Segregating socioeconomic classes leads to an unequal redistribution of wealth," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. OHNO, Takashi, 2015. "Capital-Labor Conflict in the Harrodian model," CCES Discussion Paper Series 61, Center for Research on Contemporary Economic Systems, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Bárcena Ibarra, Alicia, 2022. "Equality at the heart of ECLAC thinking: Ideas, policies and actions from 2008 to 2022," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47996 edited by Eclac.
    14. Hiroyasu Uemura, 2019. "Social preference and civil society in the institutional analysis of capitalisms: an attempt to integrate Samuel Bowles’ The Moral Economy and Robert Boyer’s Régulation Theory," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 433-453, December.
    15. Taro Abe, 2016. "Egalitarian Policies, Effective Demand, and Globalization: Considering Budget Constraint," Discussion papers e-15-014, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    16. Kufenko, Vadim & Geloso, Vincent, 2021. "Who are the champions? Inequality, economic freedom and the Olympics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 411-427, June.
    17. Mirakhor, Abbas & Ng, Adam & Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Hamid, Baharom Abdul, 2017. "Is the regime of risk transfer sustainable? Impossible contract and inequality," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 16-19.
    18. Flechtner, Svenja & Panther, Stephan, 2017. "Global and domestic inequalities and the political economy of the midde-income trap," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-29, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    19. Sharon Baute & Francesco Nicoli & Frank Vandenbroucke, 2022. "Conditional Generosity and Deservingness in Public Support for European Unemployment Risk Sharing," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 721-740, May.
    20. Ilan Wiesel & Fanqi Liu, 2021. "Conceptualising modes of redistribution in public urban infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1561-1580, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:jkaubr:673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.