IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rej/journl/v18y2015i57p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Freedom and Cultural Flourishing: A Praxeological Account on Value, Capital, Sustainability, and Identity

Author

Listed:
  • Octavian-Dragomir Jora

Abstract

A theory of cultural “value, capital, and sustainability†(as core economic concepts) is just a subset of the general economic theory. The “cultural†epithet cannot generate independent epistemic effects, even though the mainstream economics of culture assumes the “cultural value†, “cultural capital†, “cultural sustainability†as special realities, requiring special treatment. But if the cultural aspect can underline something “special†, then, starting from some common definitions of culture, pointing to “a set of shared values, preferences, beliefs†, we are dealing with subjective preferences demonstrable in action, with voluntary inter-personal relations, and with clearly defined property rights, since cultural mark is imprinted on various material supports as scarce resources. This paper takes an Austrian School praxeological route in cultural economics. The peculiarity of the proposed research line lies in demonstrating how such praxeological analysis may explain the fecundity of the cultural realm, as an expression of exercising the human freedom in society, by voluntarily sharing its seeds and fruits. Thus, the praxeological test of culture-making-of is meant to reveal institutional situations that do not meet the genuine cultural value exigency, nor the idea of cultural reproducibility, nor the idea of cultural survival, since they rely not on free and fair human (inter)action, but on violent and wasteful redistributions and privileges (aka support and protection).

Suggested Citation

  • Octavian-Dragomir Jora, 2015. "Economic Freedom and Cultural Flourishing: A Praxeological Account on Value, Capital, Sustainability, and Identity," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(57), pages 51-66, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:57:p:51-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2015-09-23/3292/3jora.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Soto Jesus Huerta, 1998. "The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 75-114, March.
    2. repec:bpj:jeehcn:v:8:y:1998:i:1:p:75-114:n:4 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Murray N. Rothbard, 1997. "The Logic of Action One," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 968.
    4. David Throsby, 2011. "Cultural Capital," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Mihaela IACOB & Felicia ALEXANDRU & Meral KAGITCI & Georgiana Camelia CREŢAN & Filip IORGULESCU, 2012. "Cultural heritage evaluation: a reappraisal of some critical concepts involved," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(12(577)), pages 61-72, December.
    6. Jora Octavian-Dragomir, 2009. "Trei teorii liberale ale proprietăţii şi fundamentele analizei economice în termeni de proprietate (I – Mises şi utilitarismul liberal)," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 01, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Mihaela Iacob, 2011. "A Praxeological And Ethical Check-In For The Alleged Virtues In Statesmanship," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 132-149, June.
    2. D. Štastný, 2001. "Je Methodenstreit minulostí?," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2001(1).
    3. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    4. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    5. Vlad I. Rosca & Cristina Veronica Partenie, 2018. "A theoretical overview on understanding customer-based brand equity," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 19-28.
    6. Walter Block, 2010. "Rejoinder To Boettke On Coasean Economics And Communism," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 5(3), pages 9-30, September.
    7. Patrizia Lattarulo & Marco Mariani & Laura Razzolini, 2017. "Nudging museums attendance: a field experiment with high school teens," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(3), pages 259-277, August.
    8. Ferlito, Carmelo, 2015. "Ludwig M. Lachmann contro la Scuola di Cambridge [Ludwig M. Lachmann against the Cambridge School]," MPRA Paper 67759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Annie Tubadji & Brian Osoba & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Culture-based development in the USA: culture as a factor for economic welfare and social well-being at a county level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 277-303, August.
    10. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:26:y:2007:i:1:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Rüdiger Pethig & Sao-Wen Cheng, 2000. "Cultural Goods Consumption and Cultural Capital," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 86-00, Universität Siegen, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht.
    12. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    13. David Howden & Joakim Kampe, 2016. "Time preference and the process of civilization," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 382-399, April.
    14. Jankovic Ivan & Block Walter, 2019. "Private Property Rights, Government Interventionism and Welfare Economics," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(4), pages 365-397, December.
    15. Vahid Mojtahed & Carlo Giupponi & Claudio Biscaro & Animesh K. Gain & Stefano Balbi, 2013. "Integrated Assessment of Natural Hazards and Climate-Change Adaptation: II. The SERRA Methodology," Working Papers 2013:07, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    16. Tramonte, Lucia & Willms, J. Douglas, 2010. "Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 200-213, April.
    17. David Throsby, 2015. "Development Strategies for Pacific Island Economies: Is There a Role for the Cultural Industries?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 370-382, May.
    18. Walter E. Block & William Barnett, 2017. "Maturity Mismatching and “Market Failure”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 313-323, May.
    19. Schopper, Herwig, 2016. "Some remarks concerning the cost/benefit analysis applied to LHC at CERN," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 54-64.
    20. Carlos Ulibarri, 2000. "Rational Philanthropy and Cultural Capital," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(2), pages 135-146, May.
    21. Музычук, 2012. "Должно Ли Государство Финансировать Культуру? (Научный Доклад) [Should the state finance culture?]," Working papers a:pmu374:1, Institute of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    culture; freedom; praxeology; value; capital;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:57:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lupu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.