IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2001y2001i1id84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Je Methodenstreit minulostí?

Author

Listed:
  • D. Štastný

Abstract

In the first part, and on the general level, the article defends the methodological dualism of rationalism against much more fashionable methodological monism of empiricism-positivism, and shows why the latter must be considered self-contradictory and thus fallacious.In the second part, applying the rationalist position in the field of economics, it shows that economics, its subject of inquiry being action of man, should use a deductive method to arrive at apodictically true propositions. Since, on the contrary, the current mainstream economics uses almost exclusively (but fallaciously) the positivist (inductive) method, the article evaluates the negative consequences of doing so upon the fields of both theoretical economics and economic policy.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Štastný, 2001. "Je Methodenstreit minulostí?," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2001(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2001:y:2001:i:1:id:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/artkey/elg-200101-0022_Je-Methodenstreit-minulosti.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/pdfs/elg/2001/01/22.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Soto Jesus Huerta, 1998. "The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 75-114, March.
    2. Murray N. Rothbard, 1995. "Economic Thought Before Adam Smith," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 377.
    3. Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, 1997. "On Certainty and Uncertainty, or: How Rational Can Our Expectations Be?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 49-78.
    4. Murray N. Rothbard, 1997. "The Logic of Action One," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 968.
    5. Frey, Bruno S, et al, 1984. "Consensus and Dissension among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 986-994, December.
    6. repec:bpj:jeehcn:v:8:y:1998:i:1:p:75-114:n:4 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Murray N. Rothbard, 1997. "The Logic of Action Two," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Vicente Moreno‐Casas & Philipp Bagus, 2022. "Dynamic efficiency and economic complexity," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 115-134, February.
    3. Jordan Reel & Walter E. Block, 2013. "Educational Vouchers: Freedom to Choose?," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(4), December.
    4. Octavian-Dragomir Jora, 2015. "Economic Freedom and Cultural Flourishing: A Praxeological Account on Value, Capital, Sustainability, and Identity," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(57), pages 51-66, September.
    5. Jiří Štekláč, 2015. "Politicko-ekonomické varianty vyhlazování hospodářského cyklu v soudobých úvěrových ekonomikách [Political-Economic Options for Smoothing of Business Cycles within the Current Credit-Economy]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 3-31.
    6. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    7. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    8. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    9. J. Subrick & Andrew Young, 2010. "Nobelity and novelty: Finn Kydland and Edward Prescott’s contributions viewed from Vienna," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 35-53, March.
    10. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    11. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    12. Chambers, Robert, 1997. "Editorial: Responsible well-being -- a personal agenda for development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(11), pages 1743-1754, November.
    13. Colander, David, 2003. "The Aging of an Economist," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 157-176, June.
    14. Robert Ekelund & Robert Tollison, 1997. "On neoinstitutional theory and preclassical economies: mercantilism revisited," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 375-399.
    15. David Howden & Joakim Kampe, 2016. "Time preference and the process of civilization," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 382-399, April.
    16. Woller, Gary M. & Hart, David Kirkwood, 1995. "Latin American debt, the IMF, and Adam Smith: A proposal for ethical reform," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-20.
    17. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    18. van Dun Frank, 1995. "The Lawful And The Legal," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 555-580, December.
    19. Mohsen Javdani & Ha-Joon Chang, 2023. "Who said or what said? Estimating ideological bias in views among economists," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(2), pages 309-339.
    20. Ann Mari May & Mary G. McGarvey & Yana Rodgers & Mark Killingsworth, 2021. "Critiques, Ethics, Prestige and Status: A Survey of Editors in Economics," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 295-318, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2001:y:2001:i:1:id:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.