IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i7p266-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to food security among households of community-based organizations implementing agroforestry in Rongai Sub-County and mitigation factors

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Cheburet

    (Department of Development Studies, St. Paul’s University, Kenya)

  • Wanjugu Wachira

    (Department of Development Studies, St. Paul’s University, Kenya)

  • Janerose Mayabi

    (Department of Development Studies, St. Paul’s University, Kenya)

Abstract

The study sought to determine challenges to food security among households of CBOs implementing agroforestry in Rongai Sub County in Nakuru and mitigation factors. The study was anchored on the systems theory and employed a mixed research methods design with simple random sampling used to get the CBOs from which the respondents were drawn. The target population was 630 members of all forty-seven (47) CBOs implementing agroforestry in the study area. The sample size was 245 respondents selected using the proportionate random sampling method. Questionnaires comprising of both open-ended and closed-ended questions were used to collect the data. From the study, the food produced by the households is insufficient and has to be supplemented by those outside the households. The food produced is of quality controlled by factors including farm management practices and capital availability for production. There is food inaccessibility as those produced are a source of income for the households yet insufficient. However, there is an improvement compared to previous years. The households’ food production is unstable as shown by variations in production and insufficiency of the food. Food security is challenged by the failure of all members of CBOs to take part in decision-making processes, reporting, roles, and responsibilities not being assigned appropriately. Mitigation factors are hardly employed by the CBOs to curb the challenges faced in implementing agroforestry. The study recommends building the capacity of CBOs implementing agroforestry in areas of resource mobilization, empowering them to harmonize governance processes, developing and implementing an M&E framework. It also recommends the development and implementation of sound policies that promote agroforestry expansion Key Words:Food, security, agroforestry, challenges, mitigation, Rongai, Nakuru, CBOs

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Cheburet & Wanjugu Wachira & Janerose Mayabi, 2021. "Challenges to food security among households of community-based organizations implementing agroforestry in Rongai Sub-County and mitigation factors," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(7), pages 266-280, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:266-280
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1370/1056
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gershon Feder & Jock R. Anderson & Regina Birner & Klaus Deininger, 2010. "Promises and Realities of Community-Based Agricultural Extension," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Keijiro Otsuka & Kaliappa Kalirajan (ed.), Community, Market and State in Development, chapter 12, pages 187-208, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2013. "Food Security in Asia and the Pacific," ADB Reports RPT135848-2, Asian Development Bank (ADB), revised 10 Sep 2013.
    3. Shilong Piao & Philippe Ciais & Yao Huang & Zehao Shen & Shushi Peng & Junsheng Li & Liping Zhou & Hongyan Liu & Yuecun Ma & Yihui Ding & Pierre Friedlingstein & Chunzhen Liu & Kun Tan & Yongqiang Yu , 2010. "The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7311), pages 43-51, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Bingfan Wang & Zhaoyang Li & Zihan Liu & Jinwen Pang & Peng Zhang & Zhikuan Jia, 2023. "Effects of Future Climate Change on Spring Maize Yield and Water Use Efficiency under Film Mulching with Different Materials in the LOESS Plateau Region of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Chen, Shuai & Chen, Xiaoguang & Xu, Jintao, 2013. "Impacts of Climate Change on Corn and Soybean Yields in China," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149739, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Asfaw, Solomon & Mortari, Andrea Piano & Arslan, Aslihan & Karfakis, Panagiotis & Lipper, Leslie, 2015. "Welfare Impacts of Climate Shocks: Evidence from Uganda," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 230217, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Ding, Yimin & Wang, Weiguang & Song, Ruiming & Shao, Quanxi & Jiao, Xiyun & Xing, Wanqiu, 2017. "Modeling spatial and temporal variability of the impact of climate change on rice irrigation water requirements in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 89-101.
    6. Chen, Xiaoping & Qi, Zhiming & Gui, Dongwei & Gu, Zhe & Ma, Liwang & Zeng, Fanjiang & Li, Lanhai, 2019. "Simulating impacts of climate change on cotton yield and water requirement using RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 231-241.
    7. Bu, Lingduo & Chen, Xinping & Li, Shiqing & Liu, Jianliang & Zhu, Lin & Luo, Shasha & Lee Hill, Robert & Zhao, Ying, 2015. "The effect of adapting cultivars on the water use efficiency of dryland maize (Zea mays L.) in northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Lazzaroni, Sara & Wagner, Natascha, 2016. "Misfortunes never come singly: Structural change, multiple shocks and child malnutrition in rural Senegal," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 246-262.
    9. Xiaoxiao Li & Jing Ma & Yongjun Yang & Huping Hou & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2019. "Short-Term Response of Soil Microbial Community to Field Conversion from Dryland to Paddy under the Land Consolidation Process in North China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Wenfeng Chi & Yuanyuan Zhao & Wenhui Kuang & Tao Pan & Tu Ba & Jinshen Zhao & Liang Jin & Sisi Wang, 2021. "Impact of Cropland Evolution on Soil Wind Erosion in Inner Mongolia of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Tun, Than & Kennedy, Adam & Nischan, Ulrike, 2015. "Promoting Agricultural Growth In Myanmar: A Review Of Policies And An Assessment Of Knowledge Gaps," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259018, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    12. Tu, Yan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Gang, Jun & Liechty, Merrill & Xu, Jiuping & Lev, Benjamin, 2015. "Administrative and market-based allocation mechanism for regional water resources planning," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 156-173.
    13. Hui Zhang & Binhui Liu & Daowei Zhou & Zhengfang Wu & Ting Wang, 2019. "Asymmetric Soil Warming under Global Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Meng Wang & Zhengfeng An, 2022. "Regional and Phased Vegetation Responses to Climate Change Are Different in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Qingzhi Huan, 2011. "Regional Supervision Centres for Environmental Protection in China: Functions and Limitations," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(3), pages 139-162.
    16. Wang, Jianqing & Liu, Xiaoyu & Cheng, Kun & Zhang, Xuhui & Li, Lianqing & Pan, Genxing, 2018. "Winter wheat water requirement and utilization efficiency under simulated climate change conditions: A Penman-Monteith model evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 100-109.
    17. Dan Yan & Mingtian Yao & Fulco Ludwig & Pavel Kabat & He Qing Huang & Ronald W. A. Hutjes & Saskia E. Werners, 2018. "Exploring Future Water Shortage for Large River Basins under Different Water Allocation Strategies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(9), pages 3071-3086, July.
    18. Pan, Ying & Zhu, Yonghua & Lü, Haishen & Yagci, Ali Levent & Fu, Xiaolei & Liu, En & Xu, Haiting & Ding, Zhenzhou & Liu, Ruoyu, 2023. "Accuracy of agricultural drought indices and analysis of agricultural drought characteristics in China between 2000 and 2019," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Ali Arefinia & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Khaled Ahmadaali & Babak Zolghadr-Asli & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2022. "Cropping patterns based on virtual water content considering water and food security under climate change conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1709-1721, November.
    20. Xu, Ying & Findlay, Christopher, 2019. "Farmers’ constraints, governmental support and climate change adaptation: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:266-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.