IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/qba/annpro/v6y1996id176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Socialism on the Entrepreneurial Abilities of Cuban-Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Locay
  • Jorge A. Sanguinetty

Abstract

The Effect of Socialism on the Entrepreneurial Abilities of Cuban-Americans is part of the 1996 Annual Proceedings of The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Locay & Jorge A. Sanguinetty, 1996. "The Effect of Socialism on the Entrepreneurial Abilities of Cuban-Americans," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 6.
    • Handle: RePEc:qba:annpro:v:6:y:1996:id:176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ascecuba.org/asce_proceedings/the-effect-of-socialism-on-the-entrepreneurial-abilities-of-cuban-americans/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ascecuba.org/c/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/v06-40locasang.fm_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiller, Robert J & Boycko, Maxim & Korobov, Vladimir, 1991. "Popular Attitudes toward Free Markets: The Soviet Union and the United States Compared," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 385-400, June.
    2. Jorge A. Sanguinetty, 1995. "Economic Education for a Market Economy: The Cuban Case," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Tejada, 1997. "Prospects for Cuba's Entrepreneurs after Transition: A Comparative Analysis," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 7.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas R. Ziebarth & Gert G. Wagner, 2013. "Top-down v. Bottom-up: The Long-Term Impact of Government Ideology and Personal Experience on Values," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1280, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Chong, Alberto & Gradstein, Mark, 2018. "Imposed institutions and preferences for redistribution §," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 127-156, February.
    3. Bernd Hayo & Florian Neumeier, 2017. "Public Attitudes toward Fiscal Consolidation: Evidence from a Representative German Population Survey," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 42-69, February.
    4. repec:zbw:bofitp:2022_012 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Di Tella, Rafael & Galiani, Sebastian & Schargrodsky, Ernesto, 2012. "Reality versus propaganda in the formation of beliefs about privatization," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 553-567.
    6. Kenneth Koford, 1991. "Why the Ex-Communist Countries Should Take the 'Middle Way' to the Market," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_54, Levy Economics Institute.
    7. Natkhov, Timur & Pyle, William, 2023. "Revealed in transition: The political effect of planning's legacy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Costa-Font, Joan & Nicińska, Anna, 2023. "Comrades in the family? Soviet communism and demand for family insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118472, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Irina Denisova & Markus Eller & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2010. "What do Russians think about transition?1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 18(2), pages 249-280, April.
    10. Konow, James, 1996. "A positive theory of economic fairness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 13-35, October.
    11. Hemesath, Michael & Pomponio, Xun, 1995. "Student attitudes toward markets: Comparative survey data from China, the United States and Russia," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 225-238.
    12. Jennifer J. Halpern, 1997. "Elements of a Script for Friendship in Transactions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(6), pages 835-868, December.
    13. Bruno Frey & Matthias Benz & Alois Stutzer, 2004. "Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, but Also How Matters," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 160(3), pages 377-401, September.
    14. Alexander D. Smirnov & Emil B. Ershov, 1992. "Perestroika," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(3), pages 415-453, September.
    15. Elena Gaber & Leonid Polishchuk & Kharis Sokolov & Denis Stukal, 2019. "Chronicles of a democracy postponed : Cultural legacy of the Russian transition," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 27(1), pages 99-137, January.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:214-226 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Spilimbergo, Antonio & Giuliano, Paola, 2009. "Growing Up in a Recession: Beliefs and the Macroeconomy," CEPR Discussion Papers 7399, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Stephan, Paul III, 1996. "Toward a positive theory of privatization--lessons from soviet-type economies," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 173-193, June.
    19. Maxim Boycko & Robert J. Shiller, 2016. "Popular Attitudes toward Markets and Democracy: Russia and United States Compared 25 Years Later," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 224-229, May.
    20. Bartling Björn & Grieder Manuel & Zehnder Christian, 2014. "Does competition justify inequality?," ECON - Working Papers 158, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Nov 2015.
    21. Erik Eyster & Kristóf Madarász & Pascal Michaillat, 2021. "Pricing Under Fairness Concerns," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1853-1898.
    22. Pertti Haaparanta & Tuuli Juurikkala & Olga Lazareva & Jukka Pirttila & Laura Solanko & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2003. "Firms And Public Service Provision In Russia," Working Papers w0041, New Economic School (NES).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qba:annpro:v:6:y:1996:id:176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ASCE webadmin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asceeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.