IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/ppat00/1004214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Larger Mammalian Body Size Leads to Lower Retroviral Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Aris Katzourakis
  • Gkikas Magiorkinis
  • Aaron G Lim
  • Sunetra Gupta
  • Robert Belshaw
  • Robert Gifford

Abstract

Retroviruses have been infecting mammals for at least 100 million years, leaving descendants in host genomes known as endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). The abundance of ERVs is partly determined by their mode of replication, but it has also been suggested that host life history traits could enhance or suppress their activity. We show that larger bodied species have lower levels of ERV activity by reconstructing the rate of ERV integration across 38 mammalian species. Body size explains 37% of the variance in ERV integration rate over the last 10 million years, controlling for the effect of confounding due to other life history traits. Furthermore, 68% of the variance in the mean age of ERVs per genome can also be explained by body size. These results indicate that body size limits the number of recently replicating ERVs due to their detrimental effects on their host. To comprehend the possible mechanistic links between body size and ERV integration we built a mathematical model, which shows that ERV abundance is favored by lower body size and higher horizontal transmission rates. We argue that because retroviral integration is tumorigenic, the negative correlation between body size and ERV numbers results from the necessity to reduce the risk of cancer, under the assumption that this risk scales positively with body size. Our model also fits the empirical observation that the lifetime risk of cancer is relatively invariant among mammals regardless of their body size, known as Peto's paradox, and indicates that larger bodied mammals may have evolved mechanisms to limit ERV activity.Author Summary: Retroviruses have been invading mammalian genomes for over 100 million years, leaving traces known as endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). Early genome sequencing studies revealed a marked difference in the activity of retroviruses among species, with humans largely containing inactive lineages of ERVs, while the mouse contains numerous lineages of active ERVs. We explore the hypothesis that life history traits determine the activity of ERVs in mammalian genomes, and show that larger mammals have fewer ERV copies over recent evolutionary time (the last 10 million years) compared to smaller mammals. This association is determined by body size independently of any confounding variables. We build a mathematical model that shows that ERV abundance in genomes decreases with larger body size and increases with horizontal transmission. Retroviral integration can cause cancer, and our analysis suggests that larger bodied animals control ERV replication in order to postpone cancer until a post-reproductive age. This is in line with a long-standing observation that cancer rates do not fluctuate among mammals of different body size, a phenomenon known as Peto's paradox, and opens up the possibility that larger animals have evolved mechanisms to limit ERV activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Aris Katzourakis & Gkikas Magiorkinis & Aaron G Lim & Sunetra Gupta & Robert Belshaw & Robert Gifford, 2014. "Larger Mammalian Body Size Leads to Lower Retroviral Activity," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1004214
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1004214
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1004214&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Pagel, 1999. "Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 877-884, October.
    2. Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds & Marcel Cardillo & Kate E. Jones & Ross D. E. MacPhee & Robin M. D. Beck & Richard Grenyer & Samantha A. Price & Rutger A. Vos & John L. Gittleman & Andy Purvis, 2007. "The delayed rise of present-day mammals," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7135), pages 507-512, March.
    3. Rachael E. Tarlinton & Joanne Meers & Paul R. Young, 2006. "Retroviral invasion of the koala genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 442(7098), pages 79-81, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan P Tennant & Norman MacLeod, 2014. "Snout Shape in Extant Ruminants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Rodrigo S Rios & Cristian Salgado-Luarte & Ernesto Gianoli, 2014. "Species Divergence and Phylogenetic Variation of Ecophysiological Traits in Lianas and Trees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Jianhua Wang & Guan-Zhu Han, 2023. "Genome mining shows that retroviruses are pervasively invading vertebrate genomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Jonas Eberle & Renier Myburgh & Dirk Ahrens, 2014. "The Evolution of Morphospace in Phytophagous Scarab Chafers: No Competition - No Divergence?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Tong Qiu & Robert Andrus & Marie-Claire Aravena & Davide Ascoli & Yves Bergeron & Roberta Berretti & Daniel Berveiller & Michal Bogdziewicz & Thomas Boivin & Raul Bonal & Don C. Bragg & Thomas Caignar, 2022. "Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Wilkinson, Richard D. & Tavaré, Simon, 2009. "Estimating primate divergence times by using conditioned birth-and-death processes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 278-285.
    7. Mark C Mainwaring & Jenő Nagy & Mark E Hauber, 2021. "Sex-specific contributions to nest building in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1075-1085.
    8. Nathan G Swenson, 2011. "Phylogenetic Beta Diversity Metrics, Trait Evolution and Inferring the Functional Beta Diversity of Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-9, June.
    9. Fabien Lafuma & Ian J. Corfe & Julien Clavel & Nicolas Di-Poï, 2021. "Multiple evolutionary origins and losses of tooth complexity in squamates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Annie Bissonnette & Mathias Franz & Oliver Schülke & Julia Ostner, 2014. "Socioecology, but not cognition, predicts male coalitions across primates," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 794-801.
    11. Mark Pagel & Ciara O’Donovan & Andrew Meade, 2022. "General statistical model shows that macroevolutionary patterns and processes are consistent with Darwinian gradualism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Robert P Freckleton & Paul H Harvey, 2006. "Detecting Non-Brownian Trait Evolution in Adaptive Radiations," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-8, November.
    13. Elspeth Kenny & Tim R. Birkhead & Jonathan P. Green, 2017. "Allopreening in birds is associated with parental cooperation over offspring care and stable pair bonds across years," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1142-1148.
    14. Fernandes, Heitor B.F. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Figueredo, Aurelio José, 2020. "Macroevolutionary patterns and selection modes for general intelligence (G) and for commonly used neuroanatomical volume measures in primates," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. L. M. Diele-Viegas & R. T. Figueroa & B. Vilela & C. F. D. Rocha, 2020. "Are reptiles toast? A worldwide evaluation of Lepidosauria vulnerability to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 581-599, April.
    16. Ricarda Laumeier & Martin Brändle & Mark-Oliver Rödel & Stefan Brunzel & Roland Brandl & Stefan Pinkert, 2023. "The global importance and interplay of colour-based protective and thermoregulatory functions in frogs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Anders Pape Møller & László Zsolt Garamszegi, 2012. "Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 843-853.
    18. Giacomo D’Ammando & Daniel W Franks & Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, 2022. "Living in mixed-sex groups limits sexual selection as a driver of pelage dimorphism in bovids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(3), pages 541-548.
    19. Jonathan A. Rader & Tyson L. Hedrick, 2023. "Morphological evolution of bird wings follows a mechanical sensitivity gradient determined by the aerodynamics of flapping flight," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Brandon C. Wheeler & Clara J. Scarry & Andreas Koenig, 2013. "Rates of agonism among female primates: a cross-taxon perspective," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1369-1380.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1004214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plospathogens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.