IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i3p541-548..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living in mixed-sex groups limits sexual selection as a driver of pelage dimorphism in bovids

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo D’Ammando
  • Daniel W Franks
  • Jakob Bro-Jørgensen

Abstract

Among mammals, bovids provide some of the most striking examples of sexual dimorphism in colouration and pelage appendages, such as beards and manes. This dimorphism is usually assumed to have evolved through sexual selection on males in the context of intra- or intersexual communication. However, the sexes coloration and pelage appendages look similar between the two sexes in several bovid species thought to be characterized by large opportunities for sexual selection, hinting at fitness costs of dimorphic traits due to other selection pressures. This study applies the comparative method with phylogenetic control to identify the factors promoting and constraining the evolution of dimorphism in coloration and pelage appendages across bovids. We found that trait dimorphism correlated positively with large breeding group size, an indicator of the intensity of sexual selection, and negatively with male territoriality, which is also likely to affect the operation of sexual selection. The relative rarity of color and pelage dimorphism in species with territorial mating systems may be explained by weaker sexual selection due to difficulty in monopolizing females and/or sexual selection targeting other traits, such as territorial quality as an extended phenotype. We also found that dimorphism in color and pelage was reduced in species spending more time in mixed-sex groups outside the breeding season, possibly due to increased predation costs from non-uniformity. This suggests that benefits from integration into mixed-sex groups select against the extravagant male morphologies otherwise promoted by sexual selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo D’Ammando & Daniel W Franks & Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, 2022. "Living in mixed-sex groups limits sexual selection as a driver of pelage dimorphism in bovids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(3), pages 541-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:541-548.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. J. Stoner & T. M. Caro & C. M. Graham, 2003. "Ecological and behavioral correlates of coloration in artiodactyls: systematic analyses of conventional hypotheses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 823-840, November.
    2. Marcelo H Cassini & Michael Taborsky, 2020. "Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in artiodactyls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(3), pages 792-797.
    3. Christopher R. Cooney & Zoë K. Varley & Lara O. Nouri & Christopher J. A. Moody & Michael D. Jardine & Gavin H. Thomas, 2019. "Sexual selection predicts the rate and direction of colour divergence in a large avian radiation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Cécile Vanpé & Petter Kjellander & Maxime Galan & Jean-François Cosson & Stéphane Aulagnier & Olof Liberg & A. J. Mark Hewison, 2008. "Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 309-316.
    5. Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds & Marcel Cardillo & Kate E. Jones & Ross D. E. MacPhee & Robin M. D. Beck & Richard Grenyer & Samantha A. Price & Rutger A. Vos & John L. Gittleman & Andy Purvis, 2007. "The delayed rise of present-day mammals," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7135), pages 507-512, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aris Katzourakis & Gkikas Magiorkinis & Aaron G Lim & Sunetra Gupta & Robert Belshaw & Robert Gifford, 2014. "Larger Mammalian Body Size Leads to Lower Retroviral Activity," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Joshua J Medina & James M Maley & Siddharth Sannapareddy & Noah N Medina & Cyril M Gilman & John E McCormack, 2020. "A rapid and cost-effective pipeline for digitization of museum specimens with 3D photogrammetry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Wilkinson, Richard D. & Tavaré, Simon, 2009. "Estimating primate divergence times by using conditioned birth-and-death processes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 278-285.
    4. Jonathan P Tennant & Norman MacLeod, 2014. "Snout Shape in Extant Ruminants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Benjamin Padilla-Morales & Alin P. Acuña-Alonzo & Huseyin Kilili & Atahualpa Castillo-Morales & Karina Díaz-Barba & Kathryn H. Maher & Laurie Fabian & Evangelos Mourkas & Tamás Székely & Martin-Alejan, 2024. "Sexual size dimorphism in mammals is associated with changes in the size of gene families related to brain development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Ho, Lam Si Tung & Dinh, Vu & Nguyen, Cuong V., 2019. "Multi-task learning improves ancestral state reconstruction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 33-39.
    7. Tad Dallas & Andrew W Park & John M Drake, 2017. "Predicting cryptic links in host-parasite networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Cristian R Altaba, 2009. "Universal Artifacts Affect the Branching of Phylogenetic Trees, Not Universal Scaling Laws," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Yichen He & Zoë K. Varley & Lara O. Nouri & Christopher J. A. Moody & Michael D. Jardine & Steve Maddock & Gavin H. Thomas & Christopher R. Cooney, 2022. "Deep learning image segmentation reveals patterns of UV reflectance evolution in passerine birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Salvador Herrando-Pérez & Steven Delean & Barry W Brook & Phillip Cassey & Corey J A Bradshaw, 2014. "Spatial Climate Patterns Explain Negligible Variation in Strength of Compensatory Density Feedbacks in Birds and Mammals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:541-548.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.