IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The preference for potential in competence, not in morality: Asymmetric biases regarding a group's potential for moral improvement and decline

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijie Xie
  • Fangfang Wen
  • Xiao Tan
  • Jin Wei
  • Bin Zuo

Abstract

The current study examined the effect of a group’s potential for improvement and decline in morality and competence on applicants’ willingness to join the group. We conducted four experiments with 399 Chinese participants who rated their willingness to join groups with potential for improvement, potential for decline, or stability in terms of morality or competence. The results showed that, compared with groups with stable competence, participants preferred groups with potential for competence improvement and were more averse to groups with potential for competence decline. However, the biases regarding the potential for moral improvement and decline were asymmetric. Specifically, compared with groups with stable morality, participants had no preference for groups with potential for moral improvement, but were more averse to groups with potential for moral decline. Possible explanations for the asymmetric biases regarding the potential for moral improvement and decline and future research directions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijie Xie & Fangfang Wen & Xiao Tan & Jin Wei & Bin Zuo, 2020. "The preference for potential in competence, not in morality: Asymmetric biases regarding a group's potential for moral improvement and decline," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236748
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236748
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236748&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linyun W Yang & Pankaj Aggarwal & Laura Peracchio & Gita Johar & Margaret C Campbell, 2019. "No Small Matter: How Company Size Affects Consumer Expectations and Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1369-1384.
    2. Jennifer Aaker & Kathleen D. Vohs & Cassie Mogilner, 2010. "Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 224-237, August.
    3. Joana Story & Filipa Castanheira & Silvia Hartig, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and organizational attractiveness: implications for talent management," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 483-504, August.
    4. Aaker, Jennifer & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "Non-profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Research Papers 2047, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    5. Xiaomin Sun & Dan Xu & Fang Luo & Zihan Wei & Cong Wei & Gang Xue, 2015. "A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Preference for Potential Effect: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Robert W. Smith & David Faro & Katherine A. Burson, 2013. "More for the Many: The Influence of Entitativity on Charitable Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 961-976.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:355-364 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anika Schumacher & Robert Mai, 2024. "Organizational Top Dog (vs. Underdog) Narratives Increase the Punishment of Corporate Moral Transgressions: When Dominance is a Liability and Prestige is an Asset," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 19-36, September.
    2. Mansur Khamitov & Marina Puzakova, 2022. "Possessive brand names in brand preferences and choice: the role of inferred control," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1032-1051, September.
    3. Saerom Lee & Lisa E Bolton & Karen Page Winterich & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Lauren BlockAssociate Editor, 2017. "To Profit or Not to Profit? The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 853-876.
    4. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Claudia Townsend & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "The Price of Beauty: Differential Effects of Design Elements with and without Cost Implications in Nonprofit Donor Solicitations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 794-815.
    6. Sohyun Bae, 2021. "Holding an entity mind-set deters consumption of recycled content products: the role of perceived product quality," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 553-571, December.
    7. Rai, Tage S. & Diermeier, Daniel, 2015. "Corporations are Cyborgs: Organizations elicit anger but not sympathy when they can think but cannot feel," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 18-26.
    8. Fischer, Greg & Karlan, Dean & McConnell, Margaret & Raffler, Pia, 2019. "Short-term subsidies and seller type: A health products experiment in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 110-124.
    9. Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe) & Cuevas, Leslie M. & Chong, Sze Man & Lim, Heejin, 2020. "Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    10. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500142 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "What motivates Ugandan NGOs to diversify: Risk reduction or private gain?," Discussion Papers 2017-11, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    12. Jean-Pierre Thomassen & Marijke C. Leliveld & Kees Ahaus & Steven Walle, 2020. "Prosocial Compensation Following a Service Failure: Fulfilling an Organization’s Ethical and Philanthropic Responsibilities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 123-147, February.
    13. Zachary Johnson & Minoo Talebi Ashoori & Yun Jung Lee, 2018. "Self-Reporting CSR Activities: When Your Company Harms, Do You Self-Disclose?," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 153-164, December.
    14. Anne Hamby & Niusha Jones & Guohong Yu, 2021. "Exploring the effects of for‐profit and nonprofit size congruency: An exchange perspective on cause‐related marketing," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 274-292, March.
    15. Jonathan Luffarelli & Sebastiano A. Delre & Polina Landgraf, 2023. "How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 598-616, May.
    16. Delgado-Ballester, Elena & Fernandez-Sabiote, Estela, 2024. "Brand Stereotypes: On the relationships with gendered brand personality and agentic and communal values in fostering Consumer–Brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Fiedler, Jakob & Schorn, André & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2023. "The influence of risk classification and community affiliation on the acceptance of user-innovated medical devices," Working Papers 115, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    18. Halkias, Georgios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2020. "Universal dimensions of individuals' perception: Revisiting the operationalization of warmth and competence with a mixed-method approach," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 714-736.
    19. Johnson, Clark D. & Bauer, Brittney C. & Kelting, Katie & Jankuhn, Nicolas & Sim, Woojong, 2021. "Location, location … mailing location? The impact of address as a signal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 326-337.
    20. Lepthien, Anke & Papies, Dominik & Clement, Michel & Melnyk, Valentyna, 2017. "The ugly side of customer management – Consumer reactions to firm-initiated contract terminations," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 829-850.
    21. Zhou, Zhimin & Ding, Yi & Feng, Wenting & Ke, Nianman, 2021. "Extending B2B brands into the B2C market: Whether, when, and how brands should emphasize B2B industry background," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 364-375.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.