IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0222701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model based estimation of population total in presence of non-ignorable non-response

Author

Listed:
  • Shakeel Ahmed
  • Javid Shabbir

Abstract

The problem of handling non-ignorable non-response has been typically addressed under the design-based approach using the well-known sub-sampling technique introduced by Hansen and Hurwitz [1946, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol 41(236), Page 517- 529]. Alternatively, the model-based paradigm emphasizes on utilizing the underlying model relationship between the outcome variable and one or more covariate(s) whose population values are known prior to the survey. This article utilizes the model relationship between the study variable and covariate(s) for handling non-ignorable non-response and obtaining an unbiased estimator for the population total under the sub-sampling technique. The main idea is to combine the estimates obtained from the sample on first call and the sub-sample from second call using separate model relationships. The contribution of this paper helps us in providing unbiased estimates with an improved efficiency under model-based paradigm in presence of non-ignorable non-response. The provided method is more economical than the available estimators under callback methods as we are working sub-sampling and also increase response rate as a stronger mode of interview is employed for data collection. A numerical study using Monte Carlo is presented to illustrate the behavior of the proposed and the efficiency comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Shakeel Ahmed & Javid Shabbir, 2019. "Model based estimation of population total in presence of non-ignorable non-response," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222701
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222701
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222701&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0222701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barton, J. & Bain, C. & Hennekens, C.H. & Rosner, B. & Belanger, C. & Roth, A. & Speizer, F.E., 1980. "Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 70(8), pages 823-825.
    2. Angela M. Wood & Ian R. White & Matthew Hotopf, 2006. "Using number of failed contact attempts to adjust for non‐ignorable non‐response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 525-542, July.
    3. Jiming Jiang & P. Lahiri, 2006. "Mixed model prediction and small area estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(1), pages 1-96, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Shuvo Bakar & Nicholas Biddle & Philip Kokic & Huidong Jin, 2020. "A Bayesian spatial categorical model for prediction to overlapping geographical areas in sample surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 535-563, February.
    2. J. N. K. Rao, 2015. "Inferential issues in model-based small area estimation: some new developments," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 16(4), pages 491-510, December.
    3. Jan Pablo Burgard & Ralf Münnich, 2015. "Sae Teaching Using Simulations," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(4), pages 603-610, December.
    4. Marianne Goodfellow & Nancy-Ellen Kiernan & Frank Ahern & Michael A. Smyer, 1988. "Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection," Evaluation Review, , vol. 12(6), pages 638-654, December.
    5. Sedeño-Noda, A. & González-Dávila, E. & González-Martín, C. & González-Yanes, A., 2009. "Preemptive benchmarking problem: An approach for official statistics in small areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 360-369, July.
    6. Johannes Gräb & Michael Grimm, 2008. "Spatial inequalities explained - Evidence from Burkina Faso," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 173, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    7. N. Salvati & N. Tzavidis & M. Pratesi & R. Chambers, 2012. "Small area estimation via M-quantile geographically weighted regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Molina, Isabel, 2006. "Uncertainty under a multivariate nested-error regression model with logarithmic transformation," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws066117, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Miguel Boubeta & María José Lombardía & Domingo Morales, 2016. "Empirical best prediction under area-level Poisson mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 548-569, September.
    10. Lixia Diao & David D. Smith & Gauri Sankar Datta & Tapabrata Maiti & Jean D. Opsomer, 2014. "Accurate Confidence Interval Estimation of Small Area Parameters Under the Fay–Herriot Model," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(2), pages 497-515, June.
    11. Datta, Gauri S. & Torabi, Mahmoud & Rao, J.N.K. & Liu, Benmei, 2018. "Small area estimation with multiple covariates measured with errors: A nested error linear regression approach of combining multiple surveys," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 49-59.
    12. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    13. Militino, A.F. & Goicoa, T. & Ugarte, M.D., 2012. "Estimating the percentage of food expenditure in small areas using bias-corrected P-spline based estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(10), pages 2934-2948.
    14. Enrico Fabrizi & Caterina Giusti & Nicola Salvati & Nikos Tzavidis, 2014. "Mapping average equivalized income using robust small area methods," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 685-701, August.
    15. Torabi, Mahmoud & Rao, J.N.K., 2013. "Estimation of mean squared error of model-based estimators of small area means under a nested error linear regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 76-87.
    16. Han Ying, 2020. "Discussion of “Small area estimation: its evolution in five decades”, by Malay Ghosh," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 21(4), pages 30-34, August.
    17. Durrant, Gabriele B. & D'Arrigo, Julia & Steele, Fiona, 2011. "Using field process data to predict best times of contact conditioning on household and interviewer influences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52201, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Swamy, P.A.V.B. & Mehta, Jatinder S. & Chang, I-Lok & Zimmerman, T.S., 2009. "An efficient method of estimating the true value of a population characteristic from its discrepant estimates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 2378-2389, April.
    19. Yoshimori, Masayo & Lahiri, Partha, 2014. "A new adjusted maximum likelihood method for the Fay–Herriot small area model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 281-294.
    20. M. D. Ugarte & A. F. Militino & T. Goicoa, 2008. "Adjusting economic estimates in business surveys," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11), pages 1253-1265.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.