IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0215369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ZooArchNet: Connecting zooarchaeological specimens to the biodiversity and archaeology data networks

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle J LeFebvre
  • Laura Brenskelle
  • John Wieczorek
  • Sarah Whitcher Kansa
  • Eric C Kansa
  • Neill J Wallis
  • Jessica N King
  • Kitty F Emery
  • Robert Guralnick

Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaborations and data sharing are essential to addressing the long history of human-environmental interactions underlying the modern biodiversity crisis. Such collaborations are increasingly facilitated by, and dependent upon, sharing open access data from a variety of disciplinary communities and data sources, including those within biology, paleontology, and archaeology. Significant advances in biodiversity open data sharing have focused on neontological and paleontological specimen records, making available over a billion records through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. But to date, less effort has been placed on the integration of important archaeological sources of biodiversity, such as zooarchaeological specimens. Zooarchaeological specimens are rich with both biological and cultural heritage data documenting nearly all phases of human interaction with animals and the surrounding environment through time, filling a critical gap between paleontological and neontological sources of data within biodiversity networks. Here we describe technical advances for mobilizing zooarchaeological specimen-specific biological and cultural data. In particular, we demonstrate adaptations in the workflow used by biodiversity publisher VertNet to mobilize Darwin Core formatted zooarchaeological data to the GBIF network. We also show how a linked open data approach can be used to connect existing biodiversity publishing mechanisms with archaeoinformatics publishing mechanisms through collaboration with the Open Context platform. Examples of ZooArchNet published datasets are used to show the efficacy of creating this critically needed bridge between biological and archaeological sources of open access data. These technical advances and efforts to support data publication are placed in the larger context of ZooarchNet, a new project meant to build community around new approaches to interconnect zoorchaeological data and knowledge across disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle J LeFebvre & Laura Brenskelle & John Wieczorek & Sarah Whitcher Kansa & Eric C Kansa & Neill J Wallis & Jessica N King & Kitty F Emery & Robert Guralnick, 2019. "ZooArchNet: Connecting zooarchaeological specimens to the biodiversity and archaeology data networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215369
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215369&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0215369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisli Palsson & Bronislaw Szerszynski & Sverker Sörlin & John Marks & Bernard Avril & Carole Crumley & Heide Hackmann & Poul Holm & John Ingram & Alan Kirman & Mercedes Pardo Buendia & Rifka Weehuizen, 2013. "Reconceptualizing the 'Anthropos' in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research," Post-Print hal-01500892, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spector, Sam, 2020. "Space travel and the limits to growth," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Mike Mouritz & Peter Newman & Renée Newman & Jayne Bryant & Aimee Smith & Elaine Olsen, 2022. "Leadership in Sustainability: Collective Wisdom , Conversations , Creativity , Contemplation and Courage , the Five Pillars of a Master’s Teaching Unit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Michael B. Wironen & Robert V. Bartlett & Jon D. Erickson, 2019. "Deliberation and the Promise of a Deeply Democratic Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Mathias Decuypere & Hanne Hoet & Joke Vandenabeele, 2019. "Learning to Navigate (in) the Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Todd J. Braje & Matthew Lauer, 2020. "A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Yeon-soo Shim & Donald C. Bellomy, 2018. "Thinking and Acting Systematically About the Anthropocene," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 599-615, December.
    7. Anahid Roux-Rosier & Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2018. "Alternative visions : permaculture as imaginaries of the anthropocene," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01958956, HAL.
    8. Martin Bohle, 2019. "One Realm: Thinking Geoethically and Guiding Small-Scale Fisheries?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 253-270, April.
    9. Murray A. Rudd, 2015. "Awareness of Humanities, Arts and Social Science (HASS) Research Is Related to Patterns of Citizens’ Community and Cultural Engagement," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Jennifer Garard & Martin Kowarsch, 2017. "Objectives for Stakeholder Engagement in Global Environmental Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Martin Bohle & Eduardo Marone, 2021. "Geoethics, a Branding for Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Victor Marchezini & Luciana R. Londe, 2020. "Looking to future perceptions about climate change in Brazil: What children’s teachers think, learn and teach about?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2325-2337, December.
    13. Anahid Roux-Rosier & Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2018. "Alternative visions : permaculture as imaginaries of the anthropocene," Post-Print halshs-01958956, HAL.
    14. Melissa Bedinger & Lindsay Beevers & Lila Collet & Annie Visser, 2019. "Are We Doing ‘Systems’ Research? An Assessment of Methods for Climate Change Adaptation to Hydrohazards in a Complex World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, February.
    15. Jordi López Ortega, 2022. "How Anthropocene Might Save the World: Metamorphosis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-37, February.
    16. Ignacio Bergillos, 2021. "Approaches to the Anthropocene from Communication and Media Studies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Grainger, Alan, 2017. "The prospect of global environmental relativities after an Anthropocene tipping point," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 36-49.
    18. Jeff Rose & Adrienne Cachelin, 2018. "Critical sustainability: incorporating critical theories into contested sustainabilities," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 518-525, December.
    19. Remig, Moritz C., 2015. "Unraveling the veil of fuzziness: A thick description of sustainability economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 194-202.
    20. Fred Saunders, 2015. "Planetary boundaries: at the threshold… again: sustainable development ideas and politics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 823-835, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.