IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Ulrich
  • Eva Grill
  • Virginia L Flanagin

Abstract

When we think of our family and friends, we probably know someone who is good at finding their way and someone else that easily gets lost. We still know little about the biological and environmental factors that influence our navigational ability. Here, we investigated the frequency and sociodemographic determinants of wayfinding and their association with vestibular function in a representative cross-sectional sample (N = 783) of the adult German-speaking population. Wayfinding was assessed using the Wayfinding Strategy Scale, a self-report scale that produces two scores for each participant representing to what degree they rely on route-based or orientation (map-based) strategies. We were interested in the following research questions: (1) the frequency and determinants of wayfinding strategies in a population-based representative sample, (2) the relationship between vestibular function and strategy choice and (3) how sociodemographic factors influence general wayfinding ability as measured using a combined score from both strategy scores. Our linear regression models showed that being male, having a higher education, higher age and lower regional urbanization increased orientation strategy scores. Vertigo/dizziness reduced the scores of both the orientation and the route strategies. Using a novel approach, we grouped participants by their combined strategy scores in a multinomial regression model, to see whether individuals prefer one strategy over the other. The majority of individuals reported using either both or no strategy, instead of preferring one strategy over the other. Young age and reduced vestibular function were indicative of using no strategy. In summary, wayfinding ability depends on both biological and environmental factors; all sociodemographic factors except income. Over a third of the population, predominantly under the age of 35, does not successfully use either strategy. This represents a change in our wayfinding skills, which may result from the technological advances in navigational aids over the last few decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Ulrich & Eva Grill & Virginia L Flanagin, 2019. "Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204781
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204781
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204781&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amir-Homayoun Javadi & Beatrix Emo & Lorelei R. Howard & Fiona E. Zisch & Yichao Yu & Rebecca Knight & Joao Pinelo Silva & Hugo J. Spiers, 2017. "Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Anna Charisse Farr & Tristan Kleinschmidt & Prasad Yarlagadda & Kerrie Mengersen, 2012. "Wayfinding: A simple concept, a complex process," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 715-743, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Ženka & Jan Macháček & Pavel Michna & Pavel Kořízek, 2021. "Navigational Needs and Preferences of Hospital Patients and Visitors: What Prospects for Smart Technologies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Ženka & Jan Macháček & Pavel Michna & Pavel Kořízek, 2021. "Navigational Needs and Preferences of Hospital Patients and Visitors: What Prospects for Smart Technologies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Lixiao Wang & Zhenya Zhang & Shijun Lu & Jianhu Wang, 2024. "Behavior Selection Models of Fire Evacuations with the Consideration of Adaptive Evacuation Psychologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. C. Natalie van der Wal & Daniel Formolo & Mark A. Robinson & Steven Gwynne, 2021. "Examining Evacuee Response to Emergency Communications with Agent-Based Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Benhamou, Salima, 2022. "Les transformations du travail et de l’emploi à l’ère de l’Intelligence artificielle: Évaluation, illustrations et interrogations," Documentos de Proyectos 48529, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Lingzhu Zhang & Alain JF Chiaradia, 2022. "Walking in the cities without ground, how 3d complex network volumetrics improve analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1857-1874, September.
    6. Hai Xiao & Congli Xue & Jiahao Yu & Chuwei Yu & Guoqiang Peng, 2023. "Spatial Morphological Characteristics of Ethnic Villages in the Dadu River Basin, a Sino-Tibetan Area of Sichuan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Mackett, Roger L., 2021. "Policy interventions to facilitate travel by people with mental health conditions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 306-313.
    8. van Lierop, D. & Soemers, J. & Hoeke, L. & Liu, G. & Chen, Z. & Ettema, D. & Kruijf, J., 2020. "Wayfinding for cycle highways: Assessing e-bike users' experiences with wayfinding along a cycle highway in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Wei & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Importance rankings of nodes in the China Railway Express network under the Belt and Road Initiative," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-147.
    10. A. Charisse Farr & Kerrie Mengersen & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Daniel Simpson & Paul Wu & Prasad Yarlagadda, 2020. "Combining Opinions for Use in Bayesian Networks: A Measurement Error Approach," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 335-353, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.