IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile phone use and glioma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Yang
  • WenWen Guo
  • ChunSheng Yang
  • JianQin Tang
  • Qian Huang
  • ShouXin Feng
  • AiJun Jiang
  • XiFeng Xu
  • Guan Jiang

Abstract

Objective: Many studies have previously investigated the potential association between mobile phone use and the risk of glioma. However, results from these individual studies are inconclusive and controversial. The objective of our study was to investigate the potential association between mobile phone use and subsequent glioma risk using meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the Science Citation Index Embase and PubMed databases for studies reporting relevant data on mobile phone use and glioma in 1980–2016. The data were extracted and measured in terms of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random effects model. Subgroup analyses were also carried out. This meta-analysis eventually included 11 studies comprising a total 6028 cases and 11488 controls. Results: There was a significant positive association between long-term mobile phone use (minimum, 10 years) and glioma (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.08–1.91). And there was a significant positive association between long-term ipsilateral mobile phone use and the risk of glioma (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.12–1.92). Long-term mobile phone use was associated with 2.22 times greater odds of low-grade glioma occurrence (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.69–2.92). Mobile phone use of any duration was not associated with the odds of high-grade glioma (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72–0.92). Contralateral mobile phone use was not associated with glioma regardless of the duration of use. Similarly, this association was not observed when the analysis was limited to high-grade glioma. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term mobile phone use may be associated with an increased risk of glioma. There was also an association between mobile phone use and low-grade glioma in the regular use or long-term use subgroups. However, current evidence is of poor quality and limited quantity. It is therefore necessary to conduct large sample, high quality research or better characterization of any potential association between long-term ipsilateral mobile phone use and glioma risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Yang & WenWen Guo & ChunSheng Yang & JianQin Tang & Qian Huang & ShouXin Feng & AiJun Jiang & XiFeng Xu & Guan Jiang, 2017. "Mobile phone use and glioma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175136
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175136&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David A Springate & David Reeves, 2013. "A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoon-Jung Choi & Joel M. Moskowitz & Seung-Kwon Myung & Yi-Ryoung Lee & Yun-Chul Hong, 2020. "Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filipe Manuel Clemente & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & José Afonso & Hugo Sarmento & Thomas Rosemann & Beat Knechtle, 2021. "A Meta-Analytical Comparison of the Effects of Small-Sided Games vs. Running-Based High-Intensity Interval Training on Soccer Players’ Repeated-Sprint Ability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Xiaoli Hua & Lili Yu & Ruxu You & Yu Yang & Jing Liao & Dongsheng Chen & Lixiu Yu, 2016. "Association among Dietary Flavonoids, Flavonoid Subclasses and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Zhihua Ye & Xin Zhang & Yihuan Luo & Shikang Li & Lanshan Huang & Zuyun Li & Ping Li & Gang Chen, 2016. "Prognostic Values of Vimentin Expression and Its Clinicopathological Significance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies with 4118 Cases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yan Wang & Lan Huang & Li Zhang & Yi Qu & Dezhi Mu, 2017. "Iron Status in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Lara Carneiro & José Afonso & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Eugenia Murawska-Ciałowciz & Adilson Marques & Filipe Manuel Clemente, 2020. "The Effects of Exclusively Resistance Training-Based Supervised Programs in People with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Ogundeji, Yewande Kofoworola & Bland, John Martin & Sheldon, Trevor Andrew, 2016. "The effectiveness of payment for performance in health care: A meta-analysis and exploration of variation in outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1141-1150.
    7. Min Wen & Bo Zhou & Yun-Hua Chen & Zhao-Lei Ma & Yun Gou & Chun-Lin Zhang & Wen-Feng Yu & Ling Jiao, 2017. "Serum uric acid levels in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Tseday Jemaneh Mekasha & Finn Tarp, 2019. "A Meta-Analysis of Aid Effectiveness: Revisiting the Evidence," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 5-28.
    9. Rodolfo Castro & Hugo Perazzo & Letícia Artilles Mello Mendonça de Araujo & Isabella Gonçalves Gutierres & Beatriz Grinsztejn & Valdiléa G Veloso, 2020. "Effectiveness of implementing a decentralized delivery of hepatitis C virus treatment with direct-acting antivirals: A systematic review with meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Diandian Li & Yi Liu & Bo Wang, 2020. "Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Martina Lori & Sarah Symnaczik & Paul Mäder & Gerlinde De Deyn & Andreas Gattinger, 2017. "Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity—A meta-analysis and meta-regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Falonn Contreras-Osorio & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Enrique Cerda-Vega & Rodrigo Campos-Jara & Cristian Martínez-Salazar & Rodrigo Araneda & Daniela Ebner-Karestinos & Cristián Arellano-Roco & Christ, 2022. "Effects of Sport-Based Exercise Interventions on Executive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Pablo Valdés-Badilla & Tomás Herrera-Valenzuela & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Esteban Aedo-Muñoz & Eduardo Báez-San Martín & Alex Ojeda-Aravena & Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, 2021. "Effects of Olympic Combat Sports on Older Adults’ Health Status: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Alícia Dorneles Dornelles & Osvaldo Artigalás & André Anjos da Silva & Dora Lucia Vallejo Ardila & Taciane Alegra & Tiago Veiga Pereira & Filippo Pinto e Vairo & Ida Vanessa Doederlein Schwartz, 2017. "Efficacy and safety of intravenous laronidase for mucopolysaccharidosis type I: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Carmen Gasca-Salas & Mario Masellis & Edwin Khoo & Binit B Shah & David Fisman & Anthony E Lang & Galit Kleiner-Fisman, 2016. "Characterization of Movement Disorder Phenomenology in Genetically Proven, Familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Shuangge Liu & Xiaoyan Xin & Teng Hua & Rui Shi & Shuqi Chi & Zhishan Jin & Hongbo Wang, 2016. "Efficacy of Anti-VEGF/VEGFR Agents on Animal Models of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Weber, Frank & Knapp, Guido & Glass, Anne & Kundt, Günther & Ickstadt, Katja, 2020. "Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random-effects meta-analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods," OSF Preprints 5zbh6, Center for Open Science.
    18. Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz & Andrea Ruiz-Alejos & J Jaime Miranda & Rohini Mathur & Pablo Perel & Liam Smeeth, 2017. "EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, October.
    19. Neesha Rockwood & Leila H Abdullahi & Robert J Wilkinson & Graeme Meintjes, 2015. "Risk Factors for Acquired Rifamycin and Isoniazid Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. David Daniel Ebert & Anna-Carlotta Zarski & Helen Christensen & Yvonne Stikkelbroek & Pim Cuijpers & Matthias Berking & Heleen Riper, 2015. "Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.