IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0172636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief

Author

Listed:
  • Clinton Sanchez
  • Brian Sundermeier
  • Kenneth Gray
  • Robert J Calin-Jageman

Abstract

Gervais & Norenzayan (2012) reported in Science a series of 4 experiments in which manipulations intended to foster analytic thinking decreased religious belief. We conducted a precise, large, multi-site pre-registered replication of one of these experiments. We observed little to no effect of the experimental manipulation on religious belief (d = 0.07 in the wrong direction, 95% CI[-0.12, 0.25], N = 941). The original finding does not seem to provide reliable or valid evidence that analytic thinking causes a decrease in religious belief.

Suggested Citation

  • Clinton Sanchez & Brian Sundermeier & Kenneth Gray & Robert J Calin-Jageman, 2017. "Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172636
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172636
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172636&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0172636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Francis & Jay Tanzman & William J Matthews, 2014. "Excess Success for Psychology Articles in the Journal Science," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Daniel M. Oppenheimer & Benoit Monin, 2009. "The retrospective gambler's fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(5), pages 326-334, August.
    3. Gordon Pennycook & Robert M Ross & Derek J Koehler & Jonathan A Fugelsang, 2016. "Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Margaret Cusack & Nadya Vezenkova & Christopher Gottschalk & Robert J Calin-Jageman, 2015. "Direct and Conceptual Replications of Burgmer & Englich (2012): Power May Have Little to No Effect on Motor Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Wallace, Byron C. & Dahabreh, Issa J. & Trikalinos, Thomas A. & Lau, Joseph & Trow, Paul & Schmid, Christopher H., 2012. "Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 49(i05).
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:314-331 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Kristen D. Deppe & Frank J. Gonzalez & Jayme L. Neiman & Carly Jacobs & Jackson Pahlke & Kevin B. Smith & John R. Hibbing, 2015. "Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(4), pages 314-331, July.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:326-334 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:6:p:649-657 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Will M. Gervais & Michiel van Elk & Dimitris Xygalatas & Ryan T. McKay & Mark Aveyard & Emma E. Buchtel & Ilan Dar-Nimrod & Eva Kundtová Klocová & Jonathan E. Ramsay & Tapani Riekki & Annika M. Sved, 2018. "Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(3), pages 268-274, May.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:268-274 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Isler, Ozan & Yilmaz, Onurcan & Dogruyol, Burak, 2020. "Activating reflective thinking with decision justification and debiasing training," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(6), pages 926-938, November.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:193-202 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michael N. Stagnaro & Robert M. Ross & Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2019. "Cross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(2), pages 179-186, March.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:260-267 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:179-186 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Michael N. Stagnaro & Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2018. "Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(3), pages 260-267, May.
    10. Yilmaz, Onurcan & Isler, Ozan, 2019. "Reflection increases belief in God through self-questioning among non-believers," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(6), pages 649-657, November.
    11. S. Adil Saribay & Onurcan Yilmaz & Gülay Gözde Körpe, 2020. "Does intuitive mindset influence belief in God? A registered replication of Shenhav, Rand and Greene (2012)," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(2), pages 193-202, March.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:926-938 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Bago, Bence & Rand, David & Pennycook, Gordon, 2022. "Does deliberation decrease belief in conspiracies?," IAST Working Papers 22-137, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brandts, Jordi & Busom, Isabel & Lopez-Mayan, Cristina & Panadés, Judith, 2022. "Dispelling misconceptions about economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Gabriel Alves Vieira & Jacqueline Leta, 2024. "biblioverlap: an R package for document matching across bibliographic datasets," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4513-4527, July.
    3. Serena Vi & Damon Pham & Yu Yian Marina Du & Himanshu Arora & Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, 2021. "Mini-Implant-Retained Overdentures for the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Fatma Ben Moussa & Mariem Talbi, 2019. "Stock Market Reaction to Terrorist Attacks and Political Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence from the Tunisian Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 48-64.
    5. Shruti Murthy & Myron Anthony Godinho & Vasudeva Guddattu & Leslie Edward Simon Lewis & N Sreekumaran Nair, 2019. "Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Rami M Elshazli & Eman A Toraih & Abdelaziz Elgaml & Mohammed El-Mowafy & Mohamed El-Mesery & Mohamed N Amin & Mohammad H Hussein & Mary T Killackey & Manal S Fawzy & Emad Kandil, 2020. "Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of 6320 patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Kai Wei Lee & Sook Fan Yap & Yun Fong Ngeow & Munn Sann Lye, 2021. "COVID-19 in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Kai Wei Lee & Siew Mooi Ching & Navin Kumar Devaraj & Seng Choi Chong & Sook Yee Lim & Hong Chuan Loh & Habibah Abdul Hamid, 2020. "Diabetes in Pregnancy and Risk of Antepartum Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Karel H van der Pol & Kimberley E Wever & Mariette Verbakel & Frank L J Visseren & Jan H Cornel & Gerard A Rongen, 2021. "Allopurinol to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. repec:sae:envval:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:715-739 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Souza, Tatiene C. & Cribari–Neto, Francisco, 2018. "Intelligence and religious disbelief in the United States," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-57.
    12. Gordon Pennycook & James Allan Cheyne & Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang, 2020. "On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(4), pages 476-498, July.
    13. Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar & Niyanta Choudhary & Siow Ann Chong & Fiona Devi Siva Kumar & Edimansyah Abdin & Saleha Shafie & Boon Yiang Chua & Rob M. van Dam & Mythily Subramaniam, 2021. "Religious Affiliation in Relation to Positive Mental Health and Mental Disorders in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Laura Bowering Mullen, 2024. "Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1_suppl), pages 21582440231, April.
    15. Erika L. Peter & Peter J. Kwantes & Madeleine T. D’Agata & Janani Vallikanthan, 2024. "The role of personality traits and online behavior in belief in fake news," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Jastrzębski, Jan & Chuderski, Adam, 2022. "Analytic thinking outruns fluid reasoning in explaining rejection of pseudoscience, paranormal, and conspiracist beliefs," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Vanja Dimitrijević & Tijana Šćepanović & Vukadin Milankov & Miroslav Milankov & Patrik Drid, 2022. "Effects of Corrective Exercises on Lumbar Lordotic Angle Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:21-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:476-498 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Suzanne Hoogeveen & Julia M. Haaf & Joseph A. Bulbulia & Robert M. Ross & Ryan McKay & Sacha Altay & Theiss Bendixen & Renatas Berniūnas & Arik Cheshin & Claudio Gentili & Raluca Georgescu & Will M. G, 2022. "The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 523-535, April.
    21. William J. Matthews & Ana I. Gheorghiu & Mitchell J. Callan, 2016. "Why do we overestimate others' willingness to pay?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 21-39, January.
    22. Raluca Tomsa & Smaranda Gutu & Daniel Cojocaru & Belén Gutiérrez-Bermejo & Noelia Flores & Cristina Jenaro, 2021. "Prevalence of Sexual Abuse in Adults with Intellectual Disability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    23. Ângela Leite & Ana Ramires & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Hélder Fernando Pedrosa e Sousa, 2019. "Who Is Concerned about Terrorist Attacks? A Religious Profile," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.