IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3368-d523435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religious Affiliation in Relation to Positive Mental Health and Mental Disorders in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population

Author

Listed:
  • Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Niyanta Choudhary

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Siow Ann Chong

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Fiona Devi Siva Kumar

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Edimansyah Abdin

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Saleha Shafie

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Boon Yiang Chua

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore)

  • Rob M. van Dam

    (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
    National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore)

  • Mythily Subramaniam

    (Institute of Mental Health, Research Division, Singapore 539747, Singapore
    Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore)

Abstract

Background: This study investigated association of religious affiliation with positive mental health (PMH) and mental disorders. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 2270 adults was conducted in Singapore. Participants reported their religious affiliation to Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, Taoism, or other religions. A PMH instrument measured total PMH and six subcomponents: general coping (GC), emotional support (ES), spirituality (S), interpersonal skills (IS), personal growth and autonomy (PGA), and global affect (GA). Lifetime history of mental disorders was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results: Total PMH (mean ± SD) was 4.56 ± 0.66 for participants with any religion versus 4.12 ± 0.63 ( p = 0.002) in those without any religion. After adjustment for all potential confounders, the mean difference in total PMH between these groups was 0.348 (95% CI: 0.248–0.448). Having any religion was significantly associated with higher scores for S, GC, ES, IS, but not with PGA, GA or mental disorders. Compared with individuals without any religion, total PMH and S levels were significantly higher across all religions. Additionally, Christianity was significantly associated with higher ES, Taoism with higher GC, Buddhism and Islam with higher GC, ES and IS, Hinduism with higher IS and Sikhism with higher ES and IS. Conclusion: Our results indicate that religious affiliation is significantly associated with higher PMH, but not with mental disorders in an Asian community setting. In addition, different religions showed unique patterns of association with PMH subcomponents.

Suggested Citation

  • Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar & Niyanta Choudhary & Siow Ann Chong & Fiona Devi Siva Kumar & Edimansyah Abdin & Saleha Shafie & Boon Yiang Chua & Rob M. van Dam & Mythily Subramaniam, 2021. "Religious Affiliation in Relation to Positive Mental Health and Mental Disorders in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3368-:d:523435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corwin Smidt, 1999. "Religion and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Analysis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 565(1), pages 176-192, September.
    2. Gordon Pennycook & Robert M Ross & Derek J Koehler & Jonathan A Fugelsang, 2016. "Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piatak Jaclyn, 2023. "Do Sociocultural Factors Drive Civic Engagement? An Examination of Political Interest and Religious Attendance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 185-204, April.
    2. Brandts, Jordi & Busom, Isabel & Lopez-Mayan, Cristina & Panadés, Judith, 2022. "Dispelling misconceptions about economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. repec:sae:envval:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:715-739 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Souza, Tatiene C. & Cribari–Neto, Francisco, 2018. "Intelligence and religious disbelief in the United States," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-57.
    5. Gordon Pennycook & James Allan Cheyne & Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang, 2020. "On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(4), pages 476-498, July.
    6. Clinton Sanchez & Brian Sundermeier & Kenneth Gray & Robert J Calin-Jageman, 2017. "Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8, February.
    7. Jastrzębski, Jan & Chuderski, Adam, 2022. "Analytic thinking outruns fluid reasoning in explaining rejection of pseudoscience, paranormal, and conspiracist beliefs," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:476-498 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Suzanne Hoogeveen & Julia M. Haaf & Joseph A. Bulbulia & Robert M. Ross & Ryan McKay & Sacha Altay & Theiss Bendixen & Renatas Berniūnas & Arik Cheshin & Claudio Gentili & Raluca Georgescu & Will M. G, 2022. "The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 523-535, April.
    10. Ahsan Habib & Mabel D' Costa & Ahmed Khamis Al‐Hadi, 2023. "Consequences of local social norms: A review of the literature in accounting, finance, and corporate governance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 3-45, March.
    11. Ângela Leite & Ana Ramires & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Hélder Fernando Pedrosa e Sousa, 2019. "Who Is Concerned about Terrorist Attacks? A Religious Profile," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Das, Aniruddha, 2022. "Religious attendance and global cognitive function: A fixed-effects cross-lagged panel modeling study of older U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. Dürlinger, Florian & Fries, Jonathan & Yanagida, Takuya & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2023. "Religiosity does not prevent cognitive declines: Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3368-:d:523435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.